If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ilford XP-2
I've often used it.
It's really good, very fine-grained and sharp and can be used in a scanner with Digital Ice. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I've often used it.
It's really good, very fine-grained and sharp and can be used in a scanner with Digital Ice. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
[The Wogster wrote in rec.photo.film+labs]
Anybody here tried Ilford XP-2, if so what did you think? Seems to try to be the best of (almost) all worlds, Black and White, 50-800ASA with standard C-41 processing.... I've used it - please drop me an email if you would like some example scans of images I've taken using XP-2. Images are fine grain, and the ISO-400 rating makes the film excellent in imperfect light conditions. You might find the negs a touch contrasty, and the slightly different colour to the negs might not suit your existing working practice, if you develop your own prints in a darkroom (pull out that grade 2!). If you don't have the room/facilities/time to develop black and white negatives at home, it is convenient to be holding developed negatives, in a matter of minutes (with the aid of your local laboratory), but you probably wont think much of any prints you get made through a colour minilab printer at the same time - theyi may have a dirty sandy colour cast (which isn't as nice as a properly toned sepia print). Some 'good' labs with up to date printing kit can print actual black and white images though (when our lab handles negative print work, we can tell it to do that on our current model, but the previous models didn't have a digital scanning stage first, so could not.) -- Regards, Andy Davidson http://www.fotoserve.com/ - Better quality printing for your digital photos. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
[The Wogster wrote in rec.photo.film+labs]
Anybody here tried Ilford XP-2, if so what did you think? Seems to try to be the best of (almost) all worlds, Black and White, 50-800ASA with standard C-41 processing.... I've used it - please drop me an email if you would like some example scans of images I've taken using XP-2. Images are fine grain, and the ISO-400 rating makes the film excellent in imperfect light conditions. You might find the negs a touch contrasty, and the slightly different colour to the negs might not suit your existing working practice, if you develop your own prints in a darkroom (pull out that grade 2!). If you don't have the room/facilities/time to develop black and white negatives at home, it is convenient to be holding developed negatives, in a matter of minutes (with the aid of your local laboratory), but you probably wont think much of any prints you get made through a colour minilab printer at the same time - theyi may have a dirty sandy colour cast (which isn't as nice as a properly toned sepia print). Some 'good' labs with up to date printing kit can print actual black and white images though (when our lab handles negative print work, we can tell it to do that on our current model, but the previous models didn't have a digital scanning stage first, so could not.) -- Regards, Andy Davidson http://www.fotoserve.com/ - Better quality printing for your digital photos. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Andy Davidson wrote:
[The Wogster wrote in rec.photo.film+labs] Anybody here tried Ilford XP-2, if so what did you think? Seems to try to be the best of (almost) all worlds, Black and White, 50-800ASA with standard C-41 processing.... I've used it - please drop me an email if you would like some example scans of images I've taken using XP-2. Images are fine grain, and the ISO-400 rating makes the film excellent in imperfect light conditions. You might find the negs a touch contrasty, and the slightly different colour to the negs might not suit your existing working practice, if you develop your own prints in a darkroom (pull out that grade 2!). If you don't have the room/facilities/time to develop black and white negatives at home, it is convenient to be holding developed negatives, in a matter of minutes (with the aid of your local laboratory), but you probably wont think much of any prints you get made through a colour minilab printer at the same time - theyi may have a dirty sandy colour cast (which isn't as nice as a properly toned sepia print). I actually don't want prints, I want soup and scan, so if the scanner makes them all sea green it doesn't matter, I just switch to monochrome mode then back to RGB and apply any needed toning. Paul |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Andy Davidson wrote:
[The Wogster wrote in rec.photo.film+labs] Anybody here tried Ilford XP-2, if so what did you think? Seems to try to be the best of (almost) all worlds, Black and White, 50-800ASA with standard C-41 processing.... I've used it - please drop me an email if you would like some example scans of images I've taken using XP-2. Images are fine grain, and the ISO-400 rating makes the film excellent in imperfect light conditions. You might find the negs a touch contrasty, and the slightly different colour to the negs might not suit your existing working practice, if you develop your own prints in a darkroom (pull out that grade 2!). If you don't have the room/facilities/time to develop black and white negatives at home, it is convenient to be holding developed negatives, in a matter of minutes (with the aid of your local laboratory), but you probably wont think much of any prints you get made through a colour minilab printer at the same time - theyi may have a dirty sandy colour cast (which isn't as nice as a properly toned sepia print). I actually don't want prints, I want soup and scan, so if the scanner makes them all sea green it doesn't matter, I just switch to monochrome mode then back to RGB and apply any needed toning. Paul |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
[Paul Schmidt wrote in rec.photo.film+labs]
Andy Davidson wrote: [The Wogster wrote in rec.photo.film+labs] Anybody here tried Ilford XP-2, if so what did you think? Seems to try to be the best of (almost) all worlds, Black and White, 50-800ASA with standard C-41 processing.... [...] You might find the negs a touch contrasty, and the slightly different colour to the negs might not suit your existing working practice, if you develop your own prints in a darkroom (pull out that grade 2!). [...] I actually don't want prints, I want soup and scan, so if the scanner makes them all sea green it doesn't matter, I just switch to monochrome mode then back to RGB and apply any needed toning. Presumably your scanner has a 'capture from monochrome film' mode anyway - this will cope perfectly will the job of scanning negs made on XP2. -- Regards, Andy Davidson http://www.fotoserve.com/ - Better quality printing for your digital photos. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
[Paul Schmidt wrote in rec.photo.film+labs]
Andy Davidson wrote: [The Wogster wrote in rec.photo.film+labs] Anybody here tried Ilford XP-2, if so what did you think? Seems to try to be the best of (almost) all worlds, Black and White, 50-800ASA with standard C-41 processing.... [...] You might find the negs a touch contrasty, and the slightly different colour to the negs might not suit your existing working practice, if you develop your own prints in a darkroom (pull out that grade 2!). [...] I actually don't want prints, I want soup and scan, so if the scanner makes them all sea green it doesn't matter, I just switch to monochrome mode then back to RGB and apply any needed toning. Presumably your scanner has a 'capture from monochrome film' mode anyway - this will cope perfectly will the job of scanning negs made on XP2. -- Regards, Andy Davidson http://www.fotoserve.com/ - Better quality printing for your digital photos. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Andy Davidson wrote:
[Paul Schmidt wrote in rec.photo.film+labs] Andy Davidson wrote: [The Wogster wrote in rec.photo.film+labs] Anybody here tried Ilford XP-2, if so what did you think? Seems to try to be the best of (almost) all worlds, Black and White, 50-800ASA with standard C-41 processing.... [...] You might find the negs a touch contrasty, and the slightly different colour to the negs might not suit your existing working practice, if you develop your own prints in a darkroom (pull out that grade 2!). [...] I actually don't want prints, I want soup and scan, so if the scanner makes them all sea green it doesn't matter, I just switch to monochrome mode then back to RGB and apply any needed toning. Presumably your scanner has a 'capture from monochrome film' mode anyway - this will cope perfectly will the job of scanning negs made on XP2. Actually I have a lab that will soup and scan C41 for under $CDN 10.00 and they are on the way to work, so waiting for a couple of rolls, then I'll go in and let them try, I assume their Fuji Fronteer will have an XP-2 setting, if it just does a colour scan, that's fine too, like I said, it doesn't matter the colour, I'll reset it anyway. Getting regular B&W done, costs about $20, and can take a loooooooong time, there are few labs set up for it. If XP-2 doesn't work for me, then I'll use FP4+ or HP5+ and soup them myself. I understand that XP-2 is friendly towards technologies like Digital ICE, which has trouble with conventional B&W films. Paul |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Andy Davidson wrote:
[Paul Schmidt wrote in rec.photo.film+labs] Andy Davidson wrote: [The Wogster wrote in rec.photo.film+labs] Anybody here tried Ilford XP-2, if so what did you think? Seems to try to be the best of (almost) all worlds, Black and White, 50-800ASA with standard C-41 processing.... [...] You might find the negs a touch contrasty, and the slightly different colour to the negs might not suit your existing working practice, if you develop your own prints in a darkroom (pull out that grade 2!). [...] I actually don't want prints, I want soup and scan, so if the scanner makes them all sea green it doesn't matter, I just switch to monochrome mode then back to RGB and apply any needed toning. Presumably your scanner has a 'capture from monochrome film' mode anyway - this will cope perfectly will the job of scanning negs made on XP2. Actually I have a lab that will soup and scan C41 for under $CDN 10.00 and they are on the way to work, so waiting for a couple of rolls, then I'll go in and let them try, I assume their Fuji Fronteer will have an XP-2 setting, if it just does a colour scan, that's fine too, like I said, it doesn't matter the colour, I'll reset it anyway. Getting regular B&W done, costs about $20, and can take a loooooooong time, there are few labs set up for it. If XP-2 doesn't work for me, then I'll use FP4+ or HP5+ and soup them myself. I understand that XP-2 is friendly towards technologies like Digital ICE, which has trouble with conventional B&W films. Paul |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ilford pan 100 = ilford HP5 plus? | sreenath | In The Darkroom | 8 | July 5th 04 11:15 AM |
ilford rapid fixer | Beppe Alborč | In The Darkroom | 25 | June 24th 04 10:21 AM |
Paper question-- FreeStyle Product-Is Arista VC RC same as Ilford MG RC? | Jos. Burke | In The Darkroom | 5 | June 15th 04 05:07 AM |
Ilford 11x14 film specs | CBlood59 | In The Darkroom | 4 | March 3rd 04 06:30 PM |