If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
'Test review of D200' by Ken Rockwell
ian lincoln wrote:
There are certain composition "rules" (remember that rules are made to be broken!). Some that come to my mind a 1) The rule of thirds-- draw lines dividing the picture in thirds, both horizontally and vertically. Put the subject on one of those lines or at the intersection of two of those lines. 2) The eye is drawn from dark areas to light areas-- Make the subject lighter than the surrounding areas. (My photography teacher encouraged routinely burning in the edges of a print) 3) The eye is drawn from cool colors (blues) to warm colors (reds)-- the subject should be a warmer color than the surrounding areas. Probably the first rule is the most important, at least when shooting the photo. The second rule can be done in the darkroom, and the third rule is usually beyond your control except in a posed situation. The second and third rule can also be handled somewhat by framing and/or matting. Your lesson for today is to look at as many "masterpieces", both paintings and photographs, and see how many times the above rules were ignored; and second, to see if the "masterpiece" would be better had the rules been followed! -- Ken Hart My 2nd teacher commented on some 'professional' photographers work. He pointed out a list of errors and said 'if a student had done that he would be marked down, cos the photog is a celeb himself now he is a rule breaking genius. The 2nd photog took up teaching cos freelancing was such a unreliable form of income. My careers officer said' photography is the bane of my existence, wouldn't you like to go into management? The sad truth is that most wanna be photographers only get as far as boots or snappy snaps or working in retail outlets. Then they come back to me in 2 or 3 years saying they still haven't advanced. One of the committee members of my club works as an accountant for a sports photo outlet. Another frustrated amateur. The best example of 'its who you know not what you know' is julia margaret cameron. Terrible technique, fingerprints on plates etc but all her sitters were famous people. Of course it couldn't have had anything to do with her being one of Talbot's contemporaries AND a woman in WAY pre-women's lib times. Hell, she predates the women's suffarage movement. When she was a photographer EVERYBODY, including Daguerre were amateurs. Oh, and being a member of Victorian Britian's "upper class" probably wouldn't have anything to do with it either. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
'Test review of D200' by Ken Rockwell
no_name wrote: wrote: Your photo teacher is a ****ing moron, as are most of them, ESPECIALLY the ones with a 'fine art' background. The geometric structure of a photo is a way of analysing the composition AFTER it has been taken. Good photographers analyse the composition before taking the picture. REALLY good photographers analyse the composition before the tripod goes into the car for the drive to the location. Really good photographers compose instinctively, instantaneously, and without a thought to 'rules', in fact, without 'thinking' at all. Invariably, however, good compositions tend to follow certain patterns which to goons and morons look like 'rules'. They are nothing of the sort. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
'Test review of D200' by Ken Rockwell
"no_name" wrote in message om... wrote: So, again it will come down to what one has invested in glass. Same as with film bodies in the high end. Not really enough differance to matter as long as you don't have to dump your favorite lenses. Hell, all most of us need is a K-1000 if you get down to it but other featurs are very nice at times. But, if you can't take an interesting picuture with a simple camera then maybe we should do gardening. Or continue to learn and practice until we can make an interesting picture... That's like saying you can't buy a Leica M until you've graduated dentist school. If any camera company sold only to competant shooters, they might as well close their doors. Or how many are kept afloat by Christmas? If I had what I paid for cameras I just didn't like, I can't imagine how much I'd have, and I have no idea why I bought them in the first place. Bob Hickey |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
'Test review of D200' by Ken Rockwell
I used to teach a photo class for fun, while not working on my own
projects or assignments, and my philosophy is actually quite different. Yes, the technical aspects of photography are important. In fact, when I learned photography, I learned that stuff first before studying composition and sort of learning the "rules" by osmosis. You look at enough photos and paintings and, if you're really paying attention, you can't help but pick up a compositional principle or two. However, my approach is to first teach the basics of composition and attention to lighting before touching on technical matters. You know why? Because that's primarily what separates an amateur from a professional: good photographers see light and know how to fill a frame, and I want my students to start thinking in these terms, before concepts like f/stops and ISO and shutter speed and guide number, etc., confuse and bore the hell out of them. People want to learn how to take better photographs. The quickest way to this path is not jabbering about technical stuff. They'll fall asleep. Hell, I shoot 80% of the time in aperature-priority. Modern cameras have made knowing the technical aspects of photography almost moot. Don't get me wrong--you do have to learn this eventually--but I don't think that's the most efficient way to become good. I say learn to understand light, composition and focus correctly before you start. As for composition, I think it's important to start with principles like "fill the frame" and "rule of thirds" and leading lines, etc... And, as always, to remind the student that these are the first rules you're going to break when you start understanding the principles and developing your own style. This is what I think of as learning to crawl before walking and running, not learning technique before vision, because they are apples and oranges. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nikon D200 launch, pix request | David Kilpatrick | Digital Photography | 5 | November 4th 05 04:59 PM |
Hands-on D200 Preview | MarkČ | Digital Photography | 28 | November 2nd 05 05:14 PM |
lens review decent sites | Steve | Digital Photography | 1 | February 14th 05 12:30 PM |
Canon G5 vs Sony DSC V1 | Orfeo | Digital Photography | 25 | August 19th 04 10:19 AM |
Develper for Delta-100 | Frank Pittel | In The Darkroom | 8 | March 1st 04 04:36 PM |