BAN: Photography on USA trains and buses

Rata Rioja wrote:

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:01:42 GMT, Any Moose Poster
wrote:


That's an overstated misconception on your part.


You'll find out soon if you re-elect shrub. Go for it, I beg you, and
let the guy bring your country on its knees. As you see nowadays, the
US is pretty much alone in their self-appointed role as great defender
of freedom of people, and that is a costly business. I bet your taxes
will start rising, after Bush is re-elected, to finance his wars. If
that happens, you got what you deserved. But it might of course be
you don't mind to pay extra taxes to sent your soldiers overseas...

Yo, Rata!

However fervent you feel about your position, it's simply taking up
space in a bunch of unrelated NGs.

...... or are you aware that you're doing so? I am sure there are many
NG's that'd love to debate whatever you write....

--

John McWilliams

In article ,
Rata Rioja wrote:

Anyone with half a brain, doesn't want to go to a
police-state anymore.

Anyone with half a brain wouldn't say it was a police state.
Anyone who wasn't terrorist sympathizer wouldn't say it was
a police state.

Do I like George Bush, No. & I have the right to voice that
as loudly as I like.
--
Duzz that A moose you ?

In article ,
Rata Rioja wrote:

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:01:42 GMT, Any Moose Poster
wrote:

That's an overstated misconception on your part.

You'll find out soon if you re-elect shrub. Go for it, I beg you, and
let the guy bring your country on its knees. As you see nowadays, the
US is pretty much alone in their self-appointed role as great defender
of freedom of people, and that is a costly business. I bet your taxes
will start rising, after Bush is re-elected, to finance his wars. If
that happens, you got what you deserved. But it might of course be
you don't mind to pay extra taxes to sent your soldiers overseas...

If You ? Well "F" You, I continously have stated I didn't vote for GB
nor will I.
--
Duzz that A moose you ?

"Any Moose Poster" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Rata Rioja wrote:

Anyone with half a brain, doesn't want to go to a
police-state anymore.

Anyone with half a brain wouldn't say it was a police state.
Anyone who wasn't terrorist sympathizer wouldn't say it was
a police state.

Damn Moose, didn't you recently castigate me for saying as much?

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:55:20 GMT, Any Moose Poster
wrote:

Anyone with half a brain wouldn't say it was a police state.

Ditch the Patriot act then. And all the draconic measures taken after
9/11. They won't help. If someone wants to do you harm from the
inside, they will find a way. Money helps a lot. And the terrorist
supporters have plenty of that.

Do I like George Bush, No. & I have the right to voice that
as loudly as I like.

You frequently did, that's true. My apologies if you felt personally
attacked in my other post, but it was supposed to be more general.

rr

In article . net,
"FLY135" FLY_135(@hot not not)notmail.com wrote:

"Any Moose Poster" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Rata Rioja wrote:

Anyone with half a brain, doesn't want to go to a
police-state anymore.

Anyone with half a brain wouldn't say it was a police state.
Anyone who wasn't terrorist sympathizer wouldn't say it was
a police state.

Damn Moose, didn't you recently castigate me for saying as much?

No you called him a terrorist sympathizer. At least that's the way your
posting sounds.
--
Duzz that A moose you ?

In article ,
Rata Rioja wrote:

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:55:20 GMT, Any Moose Poster
wrote:

Anyone with half a brain wouldn't say it was a police state.

Ditch the Patriot act then. And all the draconic measures taken after
9/11. They won't help. If someone wants to do you harm from the
inside, they will find a way. Money helps a lot. And the terrorist
supporters have plenty of that.

Do I like George Bush, No. & I have the right to voice that
as loudly as I like.

You frequently did, that's true. My apologies if you felt personally
attacked in my other post, but it was supposed to be more general.

A certain measure of Draconian was needed at the time. There probably
were abuses, nothing new to governments though, no matter where one lives.

Vigilance is a requirement at this point, a better tact would be refinements of
the Patriot act. Who comes into this country we need to know
who they are whether they have good intentions. You don't suggest otherwise, do you?

Apologies accepted.
--
Duzz that A moose you ?

"Any Moose Poster" wrote in message
...
In article . net,
"FLY135" FLY_135(@hot not not)notmail.com wrote:

"Any Moose Poster" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Rata Rioja wrote:

Anyone with half a brain, doesn't want to go to a
police-state anymore.

Anyone with half a brain wouldn't say it was a police state.
Anyone who wasn't terrorist sympathizer wouldn't say it was
a police state.

Damn Moose, didn't you recently castigate me for saying as much?

No you called him a terrorist sympathizer. At least that's the way your
posting sounds.

If you look at the logic of your post that's exactly what you did.

FLY135 wrote:

"Any Moose Poster" wrote in message
...
In article . net,
"FLY135" FLY_135(@hot not not)notmail.com wrote:

"Any Moose Poster" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Rata Rioja wrote:

Anyone with half a brain, doesn't want to go to a
police-state anymore.

Anyone with half a brain wouldn't say it was a police state.
Anyone who wasn't terrorist sympathizer wouldn't say it was
a police state.

Damn Moose, didn't you recently castigate me for saying as much?

No you called him a terrorist sympathizer. At least that's the way your
posting sounds.

If you look at the logic of your post that's exactly what you did.

I guess you didn't have logic on school:

No terrorist sympathizer = no a police state.

and thus

police state = terrorist sympathizer

May I ask you what measures do you think should be taken to turn a
country (America, Canada or in Europe) into a police state?

Wilbert

"Wilbert Dijkhof" wrote in message
...


FLY135 wrote:

"Any Moose Poster" wrote in message
...
In article . net,
"FLY135" FLY_135(@hot not not)notmail.com wrote:

"Any Moose Poster" wrote in
message
...
In article ,
Rata Rioja wrote:

Anyone with half a brain, doesn't want to go to a
police-state anymore.

Anyone with half a brain wouldn't say it was a police state.
Anyone who wasn't terrorist sympathizer wouldn't say it was
a police state.

Damn Moose, didn't you recently castigate me for saying as much?

No you called him a terrorist sympathizer. At least that's the way
your
posting sounds.

If you look at the logic of your post that's exactly what you did.

I guess you didn't have logic on school:

You guessed wrong.

No terrorist sympathizer = no a police state.

and thus

police state = terrorist sympathizer

Let's try again...

"Anyone who wasn't terrorist sympathizer wouldn't say it was a police state"

Remove the redundant "nots", which cancel each other out....

Anyone who was (a) terrorist sympathizer would say it was a police state

Since Rata said that the US is a police state, the logic of Moose's post
dictates that he is a terrorist sympathizer. That is of course predicated
on the correctness of Moose's logic.

I'd say it would be a good guess to assume English isn't your first
language, so the error is understandable.

May I ask you what measures do you think should be taken to turn a
country (America, Canada or in Europe) into a police state?

Sure you can ask.... "None"