If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sony A7RII versus Nikon D810. What's wrong with this?
In article , RichA wrote:
Looking at the two of them, using them. Anyone wonder why the Sony costs as much as the Nikon? Because it sure doesn't seem like it should. The Nikon just screams quality, from the body to the button and switch quality. The Sony seems like an increased size version of their APS bodies. I'm probably wrong, I don't know what the relative costs are, but it's just what it seems like. The Sony has more of a quality feel to it, with its metal body instead of the plastic in the Nikon. The Nikon, of course, is more comfortable to hold and use, and more logical controls. To each his own -- Sandman |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Sony A7RII versus Nikon D810. What's wrong with this?
On 2015-09-24 07:19:34 +0000, Rich A said:
On Thursday, September 24, 2015 at 2:21:35 AM UTC-4, Sandman wrote: In article , RichA wrote: Looking at the two of them, using them. Anyone wonder why the Sony costs as much as the Nikon? Because it sure doesn't seem like it should. The Nikon just screams quality, from the body to the button and switch quality. The Sony seems like an increased size version of their APS bodies. I'm probably wrong, I don't know what the relative costs are, but it's just what it seems like. The Sony has more of a quality feel to it, with its metal body instead of the plastic in the Nikon. The Nikon, of course, is more comfortable to hold and use, and more logical controls. To each his own -- Sandman Which part of the D810 is plastic? The little red thing. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sony A7RII versus Nikon D810. What's wrong with this?
If you are interested in comparisons of those cameras, you may find this
article/video worth viewing: https://luminous-landscape.com/sony-...nd-nikon-d810/ -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Sony A7RII versus Nikon D810. What's wrong with this?
In article , Rich A wrote:
RichA: Looking at the two of them, using them. Anyone wonder why the Sony costs as much as the Nikon? Because it sure doesn't seem like it should. The Nikon just screams quality, from the body to the button and switch quality. The Sony seems like an increased size version of their APS bodies. I'm probably wrong, I don't know what the relative costs are, but it's just what it seems like. Sandman: The Sony has more of a quality feel to it, with its metal body instead of the plastic in the Nikon. The Nikon, of course, is more comfortable to hold and use, and more logical controls. To each his own -- Sandman Which part of the D810 is plastic? The body. You know, the part made of plastic. It's pretty hard to miss. -- Sandman |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Sony A7RII versus Nikon D810. What's wrong with this?
On 25/09/2015 18:59, Sandman wrote:
In article , Rich A wrote: RichA: Looking at the two of them, using them. Anyone wonder why the Sony costs as much as the Nikon? Because it sure doesn't seem like it should. The Nikon just screams quality, from the body to the button and switch quality. The Sony seems like an increased size version of their APS bodies. I'm probably wrong, I don't know what the relative costs are, but it's just what it seems like. Sandman: The Sony has more of a quality feel to it, with its metal body instead of the plastic in the Nikon. The Nikon, of course, is more comfortable to hold and use, and more logical controls. To each his own -- Sandman Which part of the D810 is plastic? The body. You know, the part made of plastic. It's pretty hard to miss. It's metal. It comes out of the foundry with sharp corners and looks just like a Sony, then fettlers get to work with files and sandpaper and work for hours just to make them look like plastic. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Sony A7RII versus Nikon D810. What's wrong with this?
In article 2015092407134276377-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote: On 2015-09-24 07:19:34 +0000, Rich A said: On Thursday, September 24, 2015 at 2:21:35 AM UTC-4, Sandman wrote: In article , RichA wrote: Looking at the two of them, using them. Anyone wonder why the Sony costs as much as the Nikon? Because it sure doesn't seem like it should. The Nikon just screams quality, from the body to the button and switch quality. The Sony seems like an increased size version of their APS bodies. I'm probably wrong, I don't know what the relative costs are, but it's just what it seems like. The Sony has more of a quality feel to it, with its metal body instead of the plastic in the Nikon. The Nikon, of course, is more comfortable to hold and use, and more logical controls. To each his own -- Sandman Which part of the D810 is plastic? The little red thing. Put some ducktape over it to preserve some of the initial value of your investment! -- teleportation kills |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Sony A7RII versus Nikon D810. What's wrong with this?
In article ,
David Taylor wrote: If you are interested in comparisons of those cameras, you may find this article/video worth viewing: https://luminous-landscape.com/sony-...compared-to-ca non-5dsr-canon-1dx-and-nikon-d810/ Just download the files: https://luminous-landscape.com/?ddownload=187770 The Canon wins unless you wanna push the exposure for five steeps... -- teleportation kills |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Sony A7RII versus Nikon D810. What's wrong with this?
On 2015-09-27 05:23:31 +0000, android said:
In article 2015092407134276377-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-09-24 07:19:34 +0000, Rich A said: Which part of the D810 is plastic? The little red thing. Put some ducktape over it to preserve some of the initial value of your investment! The 'Duck uses "duct tape", or "gaffer tape". -- Regards, Savageduck |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Sony A7RII versus Nikon D810. What's wrong with this?
In article 2015092623161119784-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote: On 2015-09-27 05:23:31 +0000, android said: In article 2015092407134276377-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-09-24 07:19:34 +0000, Rich A said: Which part of the D810 is plastic? The little red thing. Put some ducktape over it to preserve some of the initial value of your investment! The 'Duck uses "duct tape", or "gaffer tape". Whatever! Don't the 'tape to hard or the little birdie might fall of then you are removing it (the tape) for the drop of the gear on the 'bay or something! -- teleportation kills |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Sony A7RII versus Nikon D810. What's wrong with this?
In article ,
RichA wrote: On Sunday, 27 September 2015 02:16:21 UTC-4, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-09-27 05:23:31 +0000, android said: In article 2015092407134276377-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-09-24 07:19:34 +0000, Rich A said: Which part of the D810 is plastic? The little red thing. Put some ducktape over it to preserve some of the initial value of your investment! The 'Duck uses "duct tape", or "gaffer tape". -- Regards, Savageduck http://www.duckbrand.com/products/du...FZWJaQodiZIDvQ Don't settle for them cheapoo copies! -- teleportation kills |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sony A7RII versus Nikon D810. What's wrong with this? | android | Digital Photography | 0 | September 13th 15 06:46 AM |
Nikon D810 hands-on review: “The highest image quality in a Nikon DSLR to date” | David Taylor | Digital Photography | 20 | June 29th 14 07:21 AM |
Poor Sony. Mini review versus full reviews for warmed over Canon and Nikon APS cameras | R. Mark Clayton | Digital Photography | 17 | April 27th 10 07:18 AM |
Poor Sony. Mini review versus full reviews for warmed over Canon and Nikon APS cameras | whisky-dave | Digital Photography | 0 | April 16th 10 01:47 PM |
Resolution: Sony Alpha versus Canon 1DsMkII, 5D & Nikon D2X | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 2 | January 2nd 07 06:22 AM |