[SI] Runoff vote for next mandate

On 2012-05-06 06:51:11 -0700, said:

Savageduck escribió:

BTW Pablo: It is also poor form to add a changed "Followup-To" header,
when the subject is "On Topic" for all the groups to which it is
X-posted. Particularly a subject which has been responded to from each
of those photo-groups. It is presumptive of you to make such an
arbitrary move.

http://fixunix.com/kde/92569-knode-follow-ups.html

As one of the respondents in that forum stated:
"The program should not choose anything, it should keep it's fingers off the
follow-ups.
Instead of good netiquette, it's just irritant behavior and sometimes you
get flamed for it."

....and it has led us to this discussion.


http://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/.../msg01666.html

More of the same.


http://lists.debian.org/debian-qt-kd.../msg00191.html

Further confirmation that KNode is not a well crafted piece of
software, and since it is a problem others have been aware of, and have
reported since 2001, it is apparent the authors are not going to do
anything to fix it.

It seems the time might have come to seek out a new client for your
particular OS..


--
Regards,

Savageduck