A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Old is new again?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 4th 11, 11:39 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital,alt.photography
Chemiker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 66
Default Old is new again?

On Sat, 21 May 2011 11:03:59 -0600, Paul L wrote:

On 5/16/2011 12:33 PM, Savageduck wrote:
It seems that for some of the current generation there is something to
be found in analog photography.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-20062810-93.html



"Digital photography allows for no mistakes by the camera," Shaw says.
"The picture is flawless, and you are the only one to blame for its
apparent ugliness. But with film, you never really know what's going to
happen. It's a surprise every time you develop and print your film.
Sometimes there can be weird color granulations, random light splotches
or double exposures."


Photography and the camera signal the demise of real art: oil
painting.

A-

  #2  
Old June 4th 11, 11:55 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital,alt.photography
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default Old is new again?

On 2011-06-04 15:39:46 -0700, Chemiker said:

On Sat, 21 May 2011 11:03:59 -0600, Paul L wrote:

On 5/16/2011 12:33 PM, Savageduck wrote:
It seems that for some of the current generation there is something to
be found in analog photography.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-20062810-93.html



"Digital photography allows for no mistakes by the camera," Shaw says.
"The picture is flawless, and you are the only one to blame for its
apparent ugliness. But with film, you never really know what's going to
happen. It's a surprise every time you develop and print your film.
Sometimes there can be weird color granulations, random light splotches
or double exposures."


Photography and the camera signal the demise of real art: oil
painting.

A-


You forgot salt!
http://www.wimp.com/artsalt/

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #3  
Old June 5th 11, 01:11 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital,alt.photography
Neil Ellwood
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 493
Default Old is new again?

On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:39:46 -0500, Chemiker wrote:

Photography and the camera signal the demise of real art: oil painting.

A-



Real Art is in the eye of the beholder. In my view it includes Oils,
watercolours, pastels, charcoals, pen and ink, pencils, all forms of
sculpture, music and photography. There is a lot that I don't like but
that is my view and does not mean that it is not art.

As an example I like classical music (also some other forms) but detest a
great deal of modern pop. but still think it is an art form, just not to
my taste.


--
Neil
Linux counter 335851
delete ‘l’ and reverse ‘r’ and’a’
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.