If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I Miss my Viewfinder !
Mxsmanic wrote:
Whisky-dave writes: Encryption is different and it's not usually compressed. Encryption is a form of reencoding of the signal using a method that is kept at least partially confidential. And addition is a form of manipulating numbers using a method that is kept at least partially confidential. (they don't say which numbers they add in the algorithm, and not what comes out). Hey, algorithms and variables must be a new idea to you. The same is true for compression, except that it is not kept confidential. It's kept as confidential as good encryption. Data is normally compressed before encryption, using a cryptographically-safe algorithm. Name a "cryptographically-unsafe algorithm". Ciphertext is incompressible, if it comes out of a good algorithm. That has nothing to do with compression before encryption. Are you now saying that an encrypted signal is the same as noise It should look just like random noise, if it is well encrypted. There will be no discernable pattern or redundancy in the signal. So it's the same or not? You can paint an orange green and someone might think it's an Apple but it isn't. Yes, that's the idea (for encryption). idea for encrpytion is patented. And you are wrong, encryption is not steganography. -Wolfgang |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I Miss my Viewfinder ! | Eric Stevens | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | June 4th 11 01:07 AM |
I Miss my Viewfinder ! | Wolfgang Weisselberg | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | June 3rd 11 06:57 PM |
I Miss my Viewfinder ! | J. Clarke[_2_] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | May 20th 11 11:32 AM |