If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Scans
I believe some of Kodak's color RA4 paper has special encoding to help
protect against unauthorized scans. Does any brand of B/W paper posess this feature? Other than imprinted copyright notices is there any way to protect a print from being scanned without permission? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Scans
Slow Dances wrote: I believe some of Kodak's color RA4 paper has special encoding to help protect against unauthorized scans. Does any brand of B/W paper posess this feature? Other than imprinted copyright notices is there any way to protect a print from being scanned without permission? I may not understand the question. Until the paper has an image on it, there is nothing to protect. Scanning an image begs the question of how. Since the purpose of recording an image is to allow someone to see it, the encoding might viewing if it protects against unauthorized scans and thus must be distributed subtly through the image. I suspect that the coding you have in mind would be in the image presented to the paper and it would only permit detecting that the image was derived from a particular source. To avoid rendering the image unattractive for viewing it would need particular properties that make it invisible. If it is not visible, but detected from a scan it would have to be distributed in the image and detected by correlation with a known key or else be recorded at a wavelength that is not visible to the unaided eye (perhaps an extra dye layer?). As a property of the paper alone, I don't think I've heard of such a thing. As a technique for coding an image, there are some such systems, but they don't seem to be unique to RA-4. But then, perhaps you meant something else? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Scans
Slow Dances wrote:
I believe some of Kodak's color RA4 paper has special encoding to help protect against unauthorized scans. Does any brand of B/W paper posess this feature? I heard [think I heard, remembered I thought I heard ...] it is possible to place a copyright code in the mini-lab printing on the back of the print indicating the print may not be copied. I imaging a studio stamp would do the same thing to any print. It is _impossible_ to keep a print from being scanned or copied if that is someone's intent. Imitation, though, is the sincerest form of flattery. -- Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Consulting Engineer: Electronics, Photonics, Informatics. Remove blanks to reply: n o lindan at ix . netcom . com f-Stop enlarging timers: http://www.nolindan.com/da/fstop/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Scans
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 14:27:20 GMT, "Nicholas O. Lindan"
wrote: Slow Dances wrote: I believe some of Kodak's color RA4 paper has special encoding to help protect against unauthorized scans. Does any brand of B/W paper posess this feature? I heard [think I heard, remembered I thought I heard ...] it is possible to place a copyright code in the mini-lab printing on the back of the print indicating the print may not be copied. I imaging a studio stamp would do the same thing to any print. It is _impossible_ to keep a print from being scanned or copied if that is someone's intent. I believe that Kodak was to implement some form of watermarking or backprinting on their professional papers. Said watermark or backprinting is detected by the Kodak copystations seen in *mart stores and such and the copy scan is aborted. Imitation, though, is the sincerest form of flattery. Yeah well one should only be flattered so much. I had one groom openly tell me that he had scanned several of my photographs and posted them to a server for his families review and subsequent printing. I wish I had taken him to court. Unfortunately legal fees in New Jersey are exorbitant to say the least. Still, if I had been able to locate that server .... $,$$$,$$$ !!!! == John S. Douglas Photographer & Webmaster www.legacy-photo,com www.xs750.net |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Scans
"Peter" wrote in message oups.com... Slow Dances wrote: I believe some of Kodak's color RA4 paper has special encoding to help protect against unauthorized scans. Does any brand of B/W paper posess this feature? Other than imprinted copyright notices is there any way to protect a print from being scanned without permission? I may not understand the question. Until the paper has an image on it, there is nothing to protect. Scanning an image begs the question of how. Since the purpose of recording an image is to allow someone to see it, the encoding might viewing if it protects against unauthorized scans and thus must be distributed subtly through the image. I suspect that the coding you have in mind would be in the image presented to the paper and it would only permit detecting that the image was derived from a particular source. To avoid rendering the image unattractive for viewing it would need particular properties that make it invisible. If it is not visible, but detected from a scan it would have to be distributed in the image and detected by correlation with a known key or else be recorded at a wavelength that is not visible to the unaided eye (perhaps an extra dye layer?). As a property of the paper alone, I don't think I've heard of such a thing. As a technique for coding an image, there are some such systems, but they don't seem to be unique to RA-4. But then, perhaps you meant something else? Years ago, when Kodak first introduced their copyprint retail systems, pros were in an uproar that their customers could now take their professional portraits into any drugstore/WalMart and make limitless copies. Kodak added some sort of "encoding" to the Pro RA-4 paper, and an upgrade to the scanners that would detect prevent the customer from making a copy, and would display a message on the screen telling the customer to get copies from the studio that originally produced the portrait. How the system worked, if it in fact did work, whether it is still in force, I don't know. Ken Hart |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Scans
On 6 Jul 2006 13:29:32 -0700, "Tim Schnetgoeke"
wrote: Other than imprinted copyright notices is there any way to protect a print from being scanned without permission? i'm printing on endura every now and then + it says "professional images are copyright protected - do not copy" on the back. although this is not exactly what you're asking about. anyway, put a stamp or sticker on the back of the prints you give to other people... And possible a signature/stamp on the front. Most pro's stamp the front of all proofs with a red copyright stamp. == John S. Douglas Photographer & Webmaster www.legacy-photo,com www.xs750.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
options for high-quality scans from B&W negs? | Scott Norwood | Digital Photography | 4 | January 9th 06 04:30 AM |
35mm negative & slide scans - as good as *ist DS images? | GS | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | March 7th 05 09:06 PM |
Archive film scans | Oskar | Digital Photography | 14 | December 15th 04 02:43 AM |
Higher resolution scans | Edward Kearns | Digital Photography | 3 | December 11th 04 09:02 PM |
6x4 Prints from 4MP olympus poor compared to 35mm scans. | pomodorojimmy | Digital Photography | 11 | September 3rd 04 09:54 PM |