If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Guth Venus is way more alive than Usenet
You'd certainly never know by way of Usenet infomercial standards, but
there's all sorts of new and improved science arriving about Venus, all of which further supports the geothermal nature of our extremely nearby and rather toasty Venus as being one seriously hot place for the likes of us wussy humans to live. The facts of that thick and terribly buoyant soup of an atmosphere being so extra toasty by day and otherwise cooling off rather nicely by night (extracting roughly 15% more thermal energy than solar contributed) does not significantly alter the geothermally heated surface situation by day or night, as being from where most of that environmental thermal energy has been derived from, that's still in the newish planetology phase of having been radiating and otherwise continually outgassing and thereby unavoidably heating the Venusian atmosphere as primarily from the bottom up. Thermal imaging and other planetology science results from Venus Express http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/obj...objectid=39432 For starters, we have had fairly old science as to appreciating the surface geothermal anomaly differentials of what that physical environment as having 225~240 K has to work with: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/science/kief...oebe_fig2b.gif Once the Venus EXPRESS PFS instrument is rebooted/activated and contributing in depth of better thermal imaging resolution that should penetrate down to the surface, whereas this is when we'll get another good deal of updated science as pertaining to those multiple hot spots or active volcanic zones of geothermal lava and/or of various surface mud flows, possibly sufficient resolution as to re-identify the active area associated with the 'Fluid Arch'. Therefore, Venus is simply not offering the exact same surface temperature upon each and every square meter of that newish environment, and there's certainly absolute loads of what's local and of essentially unlimited/renewable energy available to work with. There's also absolutely nothing technical that's entirely insurmountable on behalf of other intelligent life having existed/coexisted, whereas there's only the ongoing bigotry, greed and arrogance of Usenet naysayism that's continually hard at work of their wagging-thy-dogs to death. The image of a Venusian township or community of those extremely large structures, as having their perfectly rational configuration of infrastructure, along with having their nearby tarmac that's fairly complex, isn't a joke. But since most Usenet folks and official rusemasters tend to refuse to believe my image processing and banish all subsequent interpretations, or for that matter of whatever anyone else happens to perceive as being potentially artificial gets their official banishment or as much mainstream status quo flak and/or torment as this Usenet from naysay hell can muster (yet they'll believe each and every NASA/Apollo image w/o question and/or without a stitch of physics or any other hard-science in support thereof) is why I'm starting off by posting the raw NASA/Magellan image link, which so happens to contain those terrific items of interest, that which I've spoken of and having requested honest contributions from all that's worth sharing for the past seven years. Here's the original composite and official Magellan image at roughly 225 m and 36 looks/pixel: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif If I'm not asking too much, please take another unbiased/(open mindset) 1:1 look-see, and tell us whatever you honestly think, and please do share as to the observationology and/or planetology basis of whatever's encharge of your best SWAG or investigative mindset. If you can't manage or otherwise refuse to accomplish the digital PhotoShop enlargements, in which case I'll offer my best efforts as to sharing the step by step of whatever photographic enlargement/(zoom-in) process, and then I'll share the results of what I've managed to accomplish, which unfortunately isn't going to be 10% as good as what our nondisclosure NIMA team has to offer. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
STOP USENET GANGS--HELP THE "GOTI PROJECT" | corinne | 35mm Photo Equipment | 5 | November 13th 05 02:08 PM |
[OT, Meta] What Is Public Usenet White? | Robert McClenon | Digital Photography | 10 | May 3rd 05 02:30 AM |
[OT, Meta] What Is Public Usenet White? | Robert McClenon | 35mm Photo Equipment | 10 | May 3rd 05 02:30 AM |
Fuji S2 and Metz 44 Mz-2 Flash | elchief | In The Darkroom | 3 | April 7th 04 10:20 AM |