If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 70-210 AF f/4 operation on dSLR's
k-man wrote:
Gotcha. Thanks very much. You're welcome! Though, I don't own the 70-210 f/4 just yet. I was just doing some homework before I went for it. Looks good to me. And yes, I was wondering about your initial "A" setting comment. Thanks for clearing it up! Oh, also, I think the lens stops down to f/ 32. But I get the concept. It's a very good lens. The only thing I can criticise about it is that the focusing ring is narrow and made of hard plastic, as on most early AF Nikkors. Almost all were later upgraded to have wider, rubberised focusing rings which made manual focusing easier. The f/4 model was never upgraded. It was replaced by the inferior f/4-5.6 model which had the wider focusing ring. If you are going to use AF most of the time, this won't be a problem. If you use manual focus a lot, you might want to handle the lens before buying to see if it suits your shooting style. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 70-210 AF f/4 operation on dSLR's
On Jan 25, 5:54 pm, Tony Polson wrote:
k-man wrote: Gotcha. Thanks very much. You're welcome! Though, I don't own the 70-210 f/4 just yet. I was just doing some homework before I went for it. Looks good to me. And yes, I was wondering about your initial "A" setting comment. Thanks for clearing it up! Oh, also, I think the lens stops down to f/ 32. But I get the concept. It's a very good lens. The only thing I can criticise about it is that the focusing ring is narrow and made of hard plastic, as on most early AF Nikkors. Almost all were later upgraded to have wider, rubberised focusing rings which made manual focusing easier. The f/4 model was never upgraded. It was replaced by the inferior f/4-5.6 model which had the wider focusing ring. If you are going to use AF most of the time, this won't be a problem. If you use manual focus a lot, you might want to handle the lens before buying to see if it suits your shooting style. Right now, I'm shooting with a 1976 Kiron-produced Vivitar Series 1 70-210. I think it was the first model of this series, the one with the 67mm filter ring and constant f/3.5 and rubber hood. Talk about some sweet optics. And the macro's decent, too. But, it's fully manual and a tad large. I don't mind manual focus; but having to manually switch the aperture's a pain (hard to see without having to flip the camera all the way around and I always forget what I have it set for (makes one appreciate the viewfinder's readout)). Kevin |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 70-210 AF f/4 operation on dSLR's
k-man wrote:
On Jan 25, 5:54 pm, Tony Polson wrote: k-man wrote: Gotcha. Thanks very much. You're welcome! Though, I don't own the 70-210 f/4 just yet. I was just doing some homework before I went for it. Looks good to me. And yes, I was wondering about your initial "A" setting comment. Thanks for clearing it up! Oh, also, I think the lens stops down to f/ 32. But I get the concept. It's a very good lens. The only thing I can criticise about it is that the focusing ring is narrow and made of hard plastic, as on most early AF Nikkors. Almost all were later upgraded to have wider, rubberised focusing rings which made manual focusing easier. The f/4 model was never upgraded. It was replaced by the inferior f/4-5.6 model which had the wider focusing ring. If you are going to use AF most of the time, this won't be a problem. If you use manual focus a lot, you might want to handle the lens before buying to see if it suits your shooting style. Right now, I'm shooting with a 1976 Kiron-produced Vivitar Series 1 70-210. I think it was the first model of this series, the one with the 67mm filter ring and constant f/3.5 and rubber hood. Talk about some sweet optics. And the macro's decent, too. But, it's fully manual and a tad large. I don't mind manual focus; but having to manually switch the aperture's a pain (hard to see without having to flip the camera all the way around and I always forget what I have it set for (makes one appreciate the viewfinder's readout)). That's a very nice lens, one of Robert Monaghan's "cult classic" third party lenses. Not easy to use on a D70s though. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 70-210 AF f/4 operation on dSLR's
On Jan 25, 2:19 pm, k-man wrote:
For those familiar with the Nikon 70-210 AF f/4, being that it's an older lens, can aperture be controlled through the camera body (for things like aperture-priority or shutter-priority)? Or, would I have to control it manually, setting it on the lens directly? A D70s is what I'm using if you're curious. Thanks. Kevin I have a 70-210 f4 not a bad lens, not special either, but a good compromise between weight and image quality. The slow focus hasn't bothered me. One interesting thing about my lens is that it came witha brand X filter on it, IQ was quite poor with the filter, much, much better without. When I first tested it with the filter I was ready to send it back, never seen that much of an IQ change. Is the 70-300 VR better, well in this range VR is nice, but the lens gets slow at its longer range. Tom |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon G2 Remote operation | Ernie Willson | Digital Photography | 1 | June 13th 06 03:07 PM |
Less expensive DSLR's, Nikon or Canon | Jack | Digital Photography | 44 | March 26th 06 10:47 PM |
Nikon Picture Project illegal operation error | Lou | Digital Photography | 2 | January 25th 06 09:06 AM |
remote operation | Pete D | Digital Photography | 5 | March 23rd 05 03:01 PM |
Zeiss Contessa operation | [email protected] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | February 4th 05 12:08 AM |