If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Preservation of specs when downsizing?
I'm thinking what a "good" downscaler should be able to do, and found
one aim which I do not recollect seeing before... Given a "spec" in the image (a tiny area of high/overblown brightness) surrounded by large enough "darker" area, it should remain a "spec" after downsampling. (Applicable also to, e.g., bright stars in night sky.) Likewise for "linear specs" (such as loose individual backlit hair). I think this may be desirable to happen if the "darker area" is about 3px or more in radius AFTER downscaling. (For smaller areas, the effect should be proportionally diminished?) [Without this, bright stars would become dimmer and dimmer when downsizing ratio increases; similarly (but weakier) for backlit hair...] For best result, these specs should be put on a separate layer in the image. This would simplify editing and/or attenuation of this effect. Are there simple algorithms for finding such specs? Does existing software provide something like this? Thanks, Ilya |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
preservation of old negatives | [email protected] | In The Darkroom | 3 | November 13th 07 09:06 AM |
Something like Flickr, but without forced downsizing? | David Arnstein | Digital Photography | 2 | February 20th 06 11:30 PM |
Downsizing | Ron | Digital Photography | 17 | January 21st 05 02:39 AM |
Downsizing | Ron | Digital Photography | 0 | January 10th 05 02:57 PM |
Preservation Techniques | LiquiGuard.com | Fine Art, Framing and Display | 0 | January 7th 04 09:55 PM |