A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

bluring a messy background?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 9th 09, 03:26 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Brian[_9_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24
Default bluring a messy background?

I took a photo of someone in a shop and the background is distracting.
I tried to use the blur tool to blur the messy background but this did
not look right. Is there a better way of buring a background so a
person stand out and the background is not distracting to the viewer?

I am using Adobe photoshop elements 7.

Regards Brian

  #2  
Old June 9th 09, 03:46 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Jürgen Exner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,579
Default bluring a messy background?

Brian wrote:
I took a photo of someone in a shop and the background is distracting.
I tried to use the blur tool to blur the messy background but this did
not look right. Is there a better way of buring a background so a
person stand out and the background is not distracting to the viewer?


Suggestion for next time: use a lens with a large apperture wide open,
thus creating a very shallow DOF.

jue
  #3  
Old June 9th 09, 03:51 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Don Stauffer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 237
Default bluring a messy background?

Brian wrote:
I took a photo of someone in a shop and the background is distracting.
I tried to use the blur tool to blur the messy background but this did
not look right. Is there a better way of buring a background so a
person stand out and the background is not distracting to the viewer?

I am using Adobe photoshop elements 7.

Regards Brian



It depends on how well you do the selection to separate your subject
from the background. Sometimes it helps to make two background
selections and apply two levels of blur.

Also try darkening or lightening the background and lowering the contrast.
  #5  
Old June 9th 09, 04:22 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Floyd L. Davidson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,138
Default bluring a messy background?

Brian wrote:
I took a photo of someone in a shop and the background is distracting.
I tried to use the blur tool to blur the messy background but this did
not look right. Is there a better way of buring a background so a
person stand out and the background is not distracting to the viewer?

I am using Adobe photoshop elements 7.


I don't use PhotoShop, but the method is rather generic.

First, do a selection that includes basically the part you
want to stand out. It does *not* have to be precise. Then
invert the selection so that it is everything you want to
be less obvious that is selected.

Then you want to "feather" the selection. But how much depends
on the resolution of your image and just how large the object
is. Set the value to enough pixels that a smooth gradient will
be produced, not a sharp transition that is obvious. This is the
first of a series, and each time the feathering will be greater.
This first one should be fairly thin.

Note that when you add feathering it will go on both sides of
the line where it is selected. Hence some of the feathered
selection will be outside of the area you want to blur, and
inside what you want to be sharp. Because of that, you'll want
to begin with very very mild adjustments. Blur the selection
with a setting that you can barely see, if at all. And then set
the contrast ever so slightly lower and perhaps brightness too.

After the first adjustments, decrease the size of the selected
area by about the same number of pixels as the amount of
feathering. Reset the feathering too, and use a slightly larger
number of pixels. Then do the same blur/contrast/brightness
adjustments, but with slightly greater values.

Repeat the above series. This should probably be done in at
least half a dozen increments. Eventually you get to a position
where the selection is half way from the edges of the image to
the area to be preserved, and it is then possible to set
feathering to the minimum width of the selected area and hit it
with the maximum blur that you want to show up at the edges.

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)
  #6  
Old June 9th 09, 10:37 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Dave Cohen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 841
Default bluring a messy background?

Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
Brian wrote:
I took a photo of someone in a shop and the background is distracting.
I tried to use the blur tool to blur the messy background but this did
not look right. Is there a better way of buring a background so a
person stand out and the background is not distracting to the viewer?

I am using Adobe photoshop elements 7.


I don't use PhotoShop, but the method is rather generic.

First, do a selection that includes basically the part you
want to stand out. It does *not* have to be precise. Then
invert the selection so that it is everything you want to
be less obvious that is selected.

Then you want to "feather" the selection. But how much depends
on the resolution of your image and just how large the object
is. Set the value to enough pixels that a smooth gradient will
be produced, not a sharp transition that is obvious. This is the
first of a series, and each time the feathering will be greater.
This first one should be fairly thin.

Note that when you add feathering it will go on both sides of
the line where it is selected. Hence some of the feathered
selection will be outside of the area you want to blur, and
inside what you want to be sharp. Because of that, you'll want
to begin with very very mild adjustments. Blur the selection
with a setting that you can barely see, if at all. And then set
the contrast ever so slightly lower and perhaps brightness too.

After the first adjustments, decrease the size of the selected
area by about the same number of pixels as the amount of
feathering. Reset the feathering too, and use a slightly larger
number of pixels. Then do the same blur/contrast/brightness
adjustments, but with slightly greater values.

Repeat the above series. This should probably be done in at
least half a dozen increments. Eventually you get to a position
where the selection is half way from the edges of the image to
the area to be preserved, and it is then possible to set
feathering to the minimum width of the selected area and hit it
with the maximum blur that you want to show up at the edges.

PhotoPlus feathers outwards. Not sure about others.
Dave Cohen
  #7  
Old June 9th 09, 11:50 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
daveFaktor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 68
Default bluring a messy background?

Jürgen Exner wrote:
Brian wrote:
I took a photo of someone in a shop and the background is distracting.
I tried to use the blur tool to blur the messy background but this did
not look right. Is there a better way of buring a background so a
person stand out and the background is not distracting to the viewer?


Suggestion for next time: use a lens with a large apperture wide open,
thus creating a very shallow DOF.

jue


For now... There is a Photoshop plugin for creating a Depth of Field map
which you can then use to blur the picture from the focus point back (or
forward). It's not free but it works exceptionally well if you are
willing to spend the time to learn how to use it properly.

  #8  
Old June 10th 09, 12:40 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Tony Cooper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,748
Default bluring a messy background?

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:50:11 +1000, daveFaktor
wrote:

Jürgen Exner wrote:
Brian wrote:
I took a photo of someone in a shop and the background is distracting.
I tried to use the blur tool to blur the messy background but this did
not look right. Is there a better way of buring a background so a
person stand out and the background is not distracting to the viewer?


Suggestion for next time: use a lens with a large apperture wide open,
thus creating a very shallow DOF.

jue


For now... There is a Photoshop plugin for creating a Depth of Field map
which you can then use to blur the picture from the focus point back (or
forward). It's not free but it works exceptionally well if you are
willing to spend the time to learn how to use it properly.


Why in world would you buy a program to blur a background?

All you have to do is duplicate the background copy twice (Control J
twice), make the top layer active, turn off the "eye" in the bottom
two layers, create a selection of the whatever is in the foreground
that you want to remain in focus, inverse, and hit "delete". Then go
to the second layer, turn the eye on, and apply a Gaussian blur to
that level to the point where the background is sufficiently blurred,
turn the eye back on in the top layer, flatten, and save as a .jpg.
Some feathering may be appropriate in making the selection.

I have an extra couple of layers, but I do that because I want to be
able to dump a layer if I don't like what I've done.

The selection can be made with a layer mask, the Quick Mask, the Pen
Tool, or one of the lassos if working in full Photoshop. (Lasso or
Magic Selection Brush in Elements). The Eraser could be used, but
it's non-correctable.

The Blur Tool is not designed to blur a background. It's for blurring
small bits, and it's not very good at that. You could take the Blur
Tool and the Smudge Tool out of Photoshop and no experienced user
would miss it.

There must be 100 or more tutorials on line on how to make selections
and delete a background. The only difference here is that you are not
deleting the background completely. You are keeping it on a layer and
letting it show through around the sharp foreground part.


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
  #9  
Old June 10th 09, 01:12 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 454
Default bluring a messy background?

On 2009-06-09 15:50:11 -0700, daveFaktor said:

Jürgen Exner wrote:
Brian wrote:
I took a photo of someone in a shop and the background is distracting.
I tried to use the blur tool to blur the messy background but this did
not look right. Is there a better way of buring a background so a
person stand out and the background is not distracting to the viewer?


Suggestion for next time: use a lens with a large apperture wide open,
thus creating a very shallow DOF.

jue


For now... There is a Photoshop plugin for creating a Depth of Field
map which you can then use to blur the picture from the focus point
back (or forward). It's not free but it works exceptionally well if you
are willing to spend the time to learn how to use it properly.


You can try Tiffin Dfx plugin for CS4 & Elements for 15 days. That has
some selective blurring tools which should work.
http://www.tiffen.com/dfx_v2_home.html


--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #10  
Old June 10th 09, 02:38 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Educating The Rudimentary Photoshop Snapshooter Hicks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default bluring a messy background?

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:50:11 +1000, daveFaktor
wrote:

Jürgen Exner wrote:
Brian wrote:
I took a photo of someone in a shop and the background is distracting.
I tried to use the blur tool to blur the messy background but this did
not look right. Is there a better way of buring a background so a
person stand out and the background is not distracting to the viewer?


Suggestion for next time: use a lens with a large apperture wide open,
thus creating a very shallow DOF.

jue


For now... There is a Photoshop plugin for creating a Depth of Field map
which you can then use to blur the picture from the focus point back (or
forward). It's not free but it works exceptionally well if you are
willing to spend the time to learn how to use it properly.


That feature is built into Photoline's more advanced editor. www.pl32.net
Part of the program. It's the "Variable Blur" filter. It adjusts the amount
of Gaussian Blur by the intensity of the mask value. Editing the mask layer
with black = 0% blur, white = 100% blur. Those 12 or so meticulous,
multi-stage, feathered-mask steps previously described for Photoshop are
done in just one step in Photoline.

Though I have to admit, my favorite is still "Depth of Field Generator Pro"
plugin by Richard Rosenman. Works great with Photoline's more advanced
editing and mask creation tools. Same scenario as in Photoline, create a
DOF Map mask in varying shades of grays. It also compensates better for
that nasty halo effect that happens from pulling in the foreground image
tones into the blurred data for the background.

Now if you really want to have some "you'll never be able to tell the
difference from the real thing" fun, you might want to try the "Lenscare"
plugin. It allows you to design your own lens aperture masks to emulate
catadioptric lens systems, or any number of aperture leaves in your more
simple lens designs. Emulating the exact Bokeh that you want from any lens
design ever made. It also allows you to use depth-maps.

Catch up ... if any of you Photoshop Simpletons ever can. LOL!!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
background tony cooper Digital Photography 75 January 23rd 09 06:25 PM
White Background Galtrey Advanced Photography 2 November 27th 06 09:42 AM
A friend is going through a messy divorce and his solicitor has suggested ... Chris Digital Photography 10 August 28th 06 03:06 AM
Studio background on the web? TommyC Digital Photography 2 July 5th 06 03:21 PM
Photo Background Karl 35mm Equipment for Sale 0 May 14th 05 09:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.