If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sony tells DSLR shooters they're idiots
"Eric Stevens" wrote in message ... On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:20:52 +1100, "Trevor" wrote: "Gary Eickmeier" wrote in message ... OK, so I am iggerant. But you guys haven't been able to show me an example of a RAW image vs a JPG shot at the same time that demonstrates this superiority of image. If you are unable to demonstrate it for yourself, then it probably doesn't matter to *you* what the difference is. The rest of us already know and choose our work flow accordingly. I have several times attempted to draw the attention of the ignoramus to http://www.slrlounge.com/raw-vs-jpeg...e-visual-guide which most definitely provides the information he says that he requires. However he steadfastly refuses to either look at it or acknowledge that it provides the information that he says he requires. I think he is a troll. -- Regards, Eric Stevens **** you and the horse you rode in on. I have looked at it several times. No, it does not show any big difference in the images. G |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Sony tells DSLR shooters they're idiots
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 02:32:44 -0500, "Gary Eickmeier"
wrote: "Eric Stevens" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:20:52 +1100, "Trevor" wrote: "Gary Eickmeier" wrote in message ... OK, so I am iggerant. But you guys haven't been able to show me an example of a RAW image vs a JPG shot at the same time that demonstrates this superiority of image. If you are unable to demonstrate it for yourself, then it probably doesn't matter to *you* what the difference is. The rest of us already know and choose our work flow accordingly. I have several times attempted to draw the attention of the ignoramus to http://www.slrlounge.com/raw-vs-jpeg...e-visual-guide which most definitely provides the information he says that he requires. However he steadfastly refuses to either look at it or acknowledge that it provides the information that he says he requires. I think he is a troll. -- Regards, Eric Stevens **** you and the horse you rode in on. I have looked at it several times. Naughty naughty. You musn't lose your temper. The fact is that you have never previously acknowledged that I have given you a URL leading to a site which gives you the information you have kept bleating for. You have missed so many times that you have put me in mind of Robert A. Heinlein's "Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence and three times is enemy action". No, it does not show any big difference in the images. Then you are blind. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sony tells DSLR shooters they're idiots
On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:46:09 +0000, Anthony Polson
wrote: Eric Stevens wrote: On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 02:32:44 -0500, "Gary Eickmeier" wrote: "Eric Stevens" wrote in message ... On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:20:52 +1100, "Trevor" wrote: "Gary Eickmeier" wrote in message ... OK, so I am iggerant. But you guys haven't been able to show me an example of a RAW image vs a JPG shot at the same time that demonstrates this superiority of image. If you are unable to demonstrate it for yourself, then it probably doesn't matter to *you* what the difference is. The rest of us already know and choose our work flow accordingly. I have several times attempted to draw the attention of the ignoramus to http://www.slrlounge.com/raw-vs-jpeg...e-visual-guide which most definitely provides the information he says that he requires. However he steadfastly refuses to either look at it or acknowledge that it provides the information that he says he requires. I think he is a troll. -- Regards, Eric Stevens **** you and the horse you rode in on. I have looked at it several times. Naughty naughty. You musn't lose your temper. The fact is that you have never previously acknowledged that I have given you a URL leading to a site which gives you the information you have kept bleating for. You have missed so many times that you have put me in mind of Robert A. Heinlein's "Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence and three times is enemy action". No, it does not show any big difference in the images. Then you are blind. I think the term is 'wilfully blind'. There are none so blind as those who do not wish to see something because it would question their long- and firmly-held ignorant views. It would spoil his fun. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sony tells DSLR shooters they're idiots | J. Clarke[_2_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | December 1st 12 07:42 PM |
Sony tells DSLR shooters they're idiots | George Kerby | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | November 30th 12 06:43 PM |
Sony tells DSLR shooters they're idiots | nospam | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | November 30th 12 06:27 PM |