Guth Venus is way more alive than Usenet

Brad Guth wrote:
"John McWilliams" wrote in message


No, "Brad". He's politely asking you to **** off. Me too.


Sorry as hell that I'd ever asked for your best swag and/or supposed
expertise.

Accepted. So we're done now, then.

--
lsmft

I see that this topic as well as our "Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon"
has no apparent meaning within Usenet's infomercial-science or that of
Usenet's conditional-physics. The mater of our moon having an impact
upon global warming is almost as pointless as is that of our failing
magnetosphere.

I guess the laws of Usenet physics are once again based upon the usual
space-toilet format of their brown-nosed infomercial-science that
dictates as to what those conditional laws of physics must thereby
represent.

No wonder Ed Conrads's 280 million year old man that's every bit as old
as coal doesn't stand a chance, any more so than the truth and nothing
but the global warming truth as having been so nicely articulated by
Roger Coppock and countless others that simply refuse to being snookered
into being continually dumbfounded.

Too bad the scientific matter of replicated facts proves that I'm more
than sufficiently right. It also proves that the rest of you naysay
folks are just deathly afraid of your own perpetrated cold-war shadows.

Thankfully, the smarts and wisdom of China and Russia are soon going to
kick serious science butt, as they leave us in their moon dust and well
outside the ream of whatever their Venus has to behold.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

Brad Guth wrote:
I see that this topic as well as our "Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon"
has no apparent meaning within Usenet's infomercial-science or that of
Usenet's conditional-physics.

That's right. So you may stop spamming now, please, Sir.

F-u set.

--
lsmft

Brad Guth wrote:

I see that this topic as well as our "Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon"
has no apparent meaning within Usenet's infomercial-science or that of
Usenet's conditional-physics. The mater of our moon having an impact
upon global warming is almost as pointless as is that of our failing
magnetosphere.

I guess the laws of Usenet physics are once again based upon the usual
space-toilet format of their brown-nosed infomercial-science that
dictates as to what those conditional laws of physics must thereby
represent.

No wonder Ed Conrads's 280 million year old man that's every bit as old
as coal doesn't stand a chance, any more so than the truth and nothing
but the global warming truth as having been so nicely articulated by
Roger Coppock and countless others that simply refuse to being snookered
into being continually dumbfounded.

Too bad the scientific matter of replicated facts proves that I'm more
than sufficiently right. It also proves that the rest of you naysay
folks are just deathly afraid of your own perpetrated cold-war shadows.

Hello, Brad:

What the hell are you talking about, and how does it concern digital
photography?

Thankfully, the smarts and wisdom of China and Russia are soon going to
kick serious science butt, as they leave us in their moon dust and well
outside the ream of whatever their Venus has to behold.
-
Brad Guth

China and Russia are the armpits of the earth! They'd better worry about
their own backyards, before pouring precious monetary and technological
resources into space exploration.


Cordially,
John Turco

John Turco wrote:
Brad Guth wrote:
I see that this topic as well as our "Earth w/o Magnetosphere, w/o Moon"
has no apparent meaning within Usenet's infomercial-science or that of
Usenet's conditional-physics. The mater of our moon having an impact
upon global warming is almost as pointless as is that of our failing
magnetosphere.

I guess the laws of Usenet physics are once again based upon the usual
space-toilet format of their brown-nosed infomercial-science that
dictates as to what those conditional laws of physics must thereby
represent.

No wonder Ed Conrads's 280 million year old man that's every bit as old
as coal doesn't stand a chance, any more so than the truth and nothing
but the global warming truth as having been so nicely articulated by
Roger Coppock and countless others that simply refuse to being snookered
into being continually dumbfounded.

Too bad the scientific matter of replicated facts proves that I'm more
than sufficiently right. It also proves that the rest of you naysay
folks are just deathly afraid of your own perpetrated cold-war shadows.

Hello, Brad:

What the hell are you talking about, and how does it concern digital
photography?

Er, John, please don't encourage him! Read his other "originals". See a
pattern?

--
John McWilliams

John McWilliams wrote:

John Turco wrote:

Brad Guth wrote:

edited, for brevity

Too bad the scientific matter of replicated facts proves that I'm more
than sufficiently right. It also proves that the rest of you naysay
folks are just deathly afraid of your own perpetrated cold-war shadows.

Hello, Brad:

What the hell are you talking about, and how does it concern digital
photography?

Er, John, please don't encourage him! Read his other "originals". See a
pattern?

--
John McWilliams


Hello, John:

Well, no, as I believe this is the only one of Brad Guth's threads
I've stumbled upon, here in news:rec.photo.digital. You're implying
that he's a troll and/or kook, I assume?

In any case, I dutifully removed all of his other, cross-posted
newsgroups, before replying! g


Cordially,
John Turco

"Roy G" wrote in message


Would you do the rest of us a favour and please restrict your outpourings to
the looney groups, which are of interest only to Americans.

NO!

Sorry about that.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"John McWilliams" wrote in message


That's right. So you may stop spamming now, please, Sir.

F-u set.

You're back. So, apparently your own words have no honest meaning
whatsoever.

Too bad also that you can't accomplish any degree of digital photo
processing. (must be too complicated for your naysay mindset)
-
Brad Guth




--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"John Turco" wrote in message


What the hell are you talking about, and how does it concern digital
photography?
Sorry, I can't possibly help fools and born-again liars such as
yourself.

Thankfully, the smarts and wisdom of China and Russia are soon going to
kick serious science butt, as they leave us in their moon dust and well
outside the ream of whatever their Venus has to behold.
-
Brad Guth

China and Russia are the armpits of the earth! They'd better worry about
their own backyards, before pouring precious monetary and technological
resources into space exploration.

Wow! Such bigotry, arrogance and without a stitch of remorse to boot.
I'm seriously impressed as all get out.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

Brad Guth wrote:
"John McWilliams" wrote in message


That's right. So you may stop spamming now, please, Sir.

F-u set.

You're back.

Reverse, reverse. fu set, geniuses deleted.