If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Metering and exposure
Ok, lets say I know nothing about using partial, centre-weighted or
spot meter and I still want to get the correct exposure. Also, I know nothing about the zone system. Would you say, I can achieve the same results by bracketing? Take five instead of one shot with one at the camera recommended exposure, 2 at plus the recommended at 1/3rd EV stops and 2 at minus the recommended at 1/3rd EV stops. Or, can the difference between the correct exposure and camera recommended exposure swing more than that? Thanks, Siddhartha |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On 4 Jan 2005 04:50:52 -0800, "Siddhartha Jain"
wrote: Ok, lets say I know nothing about using partial, centre-weighted or spot meter and I still want to get the correct exposure. Also, I know nothing about the zone system. Would you say, I can achieve the same results by bracketing? Take five instead of one shot with one at the camera recommended exposure, 2 at plus the recommended at 1/3rd EV stops and 2 at minus the recommended at 1/3rd EV stops. Or, can the difference between the correct exposure and camera recommended exposure swing more than that? bracketing, also known as "the shotgun method", will work in many cases as long as you are not shooting in extreme light or extreme dark situations. You will use alot of film with that method. You are probably best off getting yourself a decent light meter such as the Sekonic L-508 and learning to use it. I also suggest a book by Jim Zuckerman entitled Perfect Exposure. Good luck, Joe |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On 4 Jan 2005 04:50:52 -0800, "Siddhartha Jain"
wrote: Ok, lets say I know nothing about using partial, centre-weighted or spot meter and I still want to get the correct exposure. Also, I know nothing about the zone system. Would you say, I can achieve the same results by bracketing? Take five instead of one shot with one at the camera recommended exposure, 2 at plus the recommended at 1/3rd EV stops and 2 at minus the recommended at 1/3rd EV stops. Or, can the difference between the correct exposure and camera recommended exposure swing more than that? I usually try to find the mid-tone area in the shot and use a zoom lense, if necessary, to get an exposure reading and use that reading for the entire shot. Hope that helps a bit. Joe http://mikmaq.cjb.net |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:12:10 -0500, stator wrote:
On 4 Jan 2005 04:50:52 -0800, "Siddhartha Jain" wrote: Ok, lets say I know nothing about using partial, centre-weighted or spot meter and I still want to get the correct exposure. Also, I know nothing about the zone system. Would you say, I can achieve the same results by bracketing? Take five instead of one shot with one at the camera recommended exposure, 2 at plus the recommended at 1/3rd EV stops and 2 at minus the recommended at 1/3rd EV stops. Or, can the difference between the correct exposure and camera recommended exposure swing more than that? bracketing, also known as "the shotgun method", will work in many cases as long as you are not shooting in extreme light or extreme dark situations. You will use alot of film with that method. Use a lot of *film*? I think you're in the wrong newsgroup. You are probably best off getting yourself a decent light meter such as the Sekonic L-508 and learning to use it. I also suggest a book by Jim Zuckerman entitled Perfect Exposure. And why not. Won't save on film though ;-) -- John Bean A cynic is a man who, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin (H. L. Mencken) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
stator wrote:
bracketing, also known as "the shotgun method", will work in many cases as long as you are not shooting in extreme light or extreme dark situations. There is no need to bracket in most situations, but rather understand where the metered part of the scene sits in the film latitude. Bracketing is more legitimate in unusual lighting such as strong back light with poorly lit subjects. You will use alot of film with that method. OTOH, with a digital camera (group topic), one can find the range of acceptable exposures quite quickly. Cheers, Alan. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
My bad!
:-) old habits die hard. Regards, Joe On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:38:59 +0000, John Bean wrote: On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:12:10 -0500, stator wrote: On 4 Jan 2005 04:50:52 -0800, "Siddhartha Jain" wrote: Ok, lets say I know nothing about using partial, centre-weighted or spot meter and I still want to get the correct exposure. Also, I know nothing about the zone system. Would you say, I can achieve the same results by bracketing? Take five instead of one shot with one at the camera recommended exposure, 2 at plus the recommended at 1/3rd EV stops and 2 at minus the recommended at 1/3rd EV stops. Or, can the difference between the correct exposure and camera recommended exposure swing more than that? bracketing, also known as "the shotgun method", will work in many cases as long as you are not shooting in extreme light or extreme dark situations. You will use alot of film with that method. Use a lot of *film*? I think you're in the wrong newsgroup. You are probably best off getting yourself a decent light meter such as the Sekonic L-508 and learning to use it. I also suggest a book by Jim Zuckerman entitled Perfect Exposure. And why not. Won't save on film though ;-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com,
Siddhartha Jain wrote: Ok, lets say I know nothing about using partial, centre-weighted or spot meter and I still want to get the correct exposure. Also, I know nothing about the zone system. Would you say, I can achieve the same results by bracketing? Take five instead of one shot with one at the camera recommended exposure, 2 at plus the recommended at 1/3rd EV stops and 2 at minus the recommended at 1/3rd EV stops. Or, can the difference between the correct exposure and camera recommended exposure swing more than that? Yes - easily. +/- 2/3 EV is a fairly small range. It's possible for the meter on the camera to read as much as two stops away from ideal. But with most DSLRs you have a far better evaluative tool available; the histogram display (plus, on many models, highlighting of burned out or grossly underexposed areas) Take the shot, look at the histogram, and decide what adjustment to make. Lather, rinse, repeat. Alternatively, if you think you've got the exposure right to within half a stop or so (i.e. within the rage that bracketing would cover) just use RAW image capture mode, if available. It will use up less storage than five high-quality JPEGs, and in most of the DSLRs that I have used you get maybe as much as 1.5 stops of extra latitude. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Siddhartha Jain" wrote in message oups.com... Ok, lets say I know nothing about using partial, centre-weighted or spot meter and I still want to get the correct exposure. Also, I know nothing about the zone system. Would you say, I can achieve the same results by bracketing? Take five instead of one shot with one at the camera recommended exposure, 2 at plus the recommended at 1/3rd EV stops and 2 at minus the recommended at 1/3rd EV stops. Or, can the difference between the correct exposure and camera recommended exposure swing more than that? Thanks, Siddhartha Read this book: Understanding Exposu How to Shoot Great Photographs with a Film or Digital Camera (Updated Edition) by Bryan Peterson You will find that bracketing is unnecessary for most situations once you understand some metering concepts. It would not hurt to understand your metering modes and metering in general (eg how to meter green etc). The problem with AEB is that you dont know how the camera is adjusting A/T since for example depth of field may be more important that capturing a moving object with a fast shutter. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
proper exposure metering | mch42 | Digital Photography | 4 | July 16th 04 08:20 PM |
Contax zoom exposure value declines from center-weighted to spot metering | Barney | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | July 10th 04 10:57 PM |
Maxxum 7000 exposure meter calibration | Alan Browne | 35mm Photo Equipment | 2 | July 7th 04 03:50 PM |
Digital Exposure Question -- Middle Gray vs Exposure At Highlights | MikeS | Digital Photography | 1 | June 24th 04 08:04 AM |
Exposure values and light metering mode guidelines for beach | Renee | Digital Photography | 0 | June 24th 04 04:18 AM |