If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I' m in color management HELL! PLease advise!
Hi all,
I'm in Color-Management HELL and I need some advice. I'm trying to scan my slides into my computer and am having difficulty getting decent results matching the scan to the slide. I know a perfect match is not really possible, but these scans are consistently dark and lackluster. Before I continue, here's some pertinent info about my system: Windows XP Pro, Minolta Scan Dual II film scanner, Epson 1670 flatbed scanner, Panasonic Monitor, Adobe Photoshop 6, and Jasc Paint Shop Pro 8. I'm *not* a newcomer to photo and imaging but I can't seem to get this right. Before I blame my equipment, I want to make sure I'm doing the color management right. Here's my understanding of how things should work: If the monitor's color profile is set as the default profile in Windows XP Color Management, you should be able to turn off color management in all other software and get consistent results from scanner to image software and other applications. This is how my system is set. I have my monitor set as the default profile. I have turned off color management in my scanner software and in my imaging apps. Is this wrong? I'm working in the sRGB color space. Should I be loading a different ICC profile or colorspace. But my scans are coming out dark and lackluster. What goes in as a nice, well exposed slide gets scanned as dark and dull and all the brilliance is gone. Manipulating them is becoming an exercise in frustration. How should I set my color management?? Here are some things that I'm not sure about: - What's the difference between sRGB, Color match RGB, Adobe RGB, etc? I have a vague idea, but I'm not sure. - What's the proper color space for images that will be uploaded to a website? - What the default Gamma for windows, 1.8? 2.2? - How is Lightness different from Brightness? - what is a color channel? Now I feel like I'm ranting. Perhaps I need to read a good book? Can someone recommend a book (or website) that's not too simple yet not too complicated? Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Viken Karaguesian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I' m in color management HELL! PLease advise!
Viken Karaguesian wrote:
Hi all, I'm in Color-Management HELL and I need some advice. I'm trying to scan my slides into my computer and am having difficulty getting decent results matching the scan to the slide. I know a perfect match is not really possible, but these scans are consistently dark and lackluster. Before I continue, here's some pertinent info about my system: Windows XP Pro, Minolta Scan Dual II film scanner, Epson 1670 flatbed scanner, Panasonic Monitor, Adobe Photoshop 6, and Jasc Paint Shop Pro 8. I'm *not* a newcomer to photo and imaging but I can't seem to get this right. Before I blame my equipment, I want to make sure I'm doing the color management right. comp.periphs.scanners , and perhaps c.p.printers is the place to get this question out to. snipped Now I feel like I'm ranting. Perhaps I need to read a good book? Can someone recommend a book (or website) that's not too simple yet not too complicated? Thanks in advance for any suggestions. www.scantips.com may have additional supporting info. -- --e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.-- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I' m in color management HELL! PLease advise!
I suspect the scanner is not set up appropriately and you are starting off
with wrong exposures. Also if you are scanning Kodachrome you may have problems because some scanners just cannot adequately illuminate Kodachrome because of its denser emulsion. Even if you think you understand the scanner instructions recheck the manual. If you are using Photoshop color management properly then once the scan enters the PS foodchain it will be color managed based on the original scan characteristics and the profiles for your monitor and printer. Some scanners employ what their manufacturer calls color management or color matching that can drastically affect the image quality, sometimes for the better but usually for worse. For scanning slides you may find the investment in Vuescan worthwhile. You can download a demo for free. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I' m in color management HELL! PLease advise!
"bmoag" wrote in message om...
I suspect the scanner is not set up appropriately and you are starting off with wrong exposures. Also if you are scanning Kodachrome you may have problems because some scanners just cannot adequately illuminate Kodachrome because of its denser emulsion. Even if you think you understand the scanner instructions recheck the manual. If you are using Photoshop color management properly then once the scan enters the PS foodchain it will be color managed based on the original scan characteristics and the profiles for your monitor and printer. Some scanners employ what their manufacturer calls color management or color matching that can drastically affect the image quality, sometimes for the better but usually for worse. For scanning slides you may find the investment in Vuescan worthwhile. You can download a demo for free. Use the link to www.scantips.com above it will explain and give you other links. However all hte colour management in the world will be useless if your system is not calibrated. Your monitor can and probably has been adjusted for coulour, contract, brightness etc already. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I' m in color management HELL! PLease advise!
"Viken Karaguesian" wrote in message ...
Hi all, I'm in Color-Management HELL and I need some advice. I'm trying to scan my slides into my computer and am having difficulty getting decent results matching the scan to the slide. I know a perfect match is not really possible, but these scans are consistently dark and lackluster. Before I Actually, you're not really using color management much of any at all which is your problem. Things like Adobe RGB or sRGB are "imaginary" color spaces that, say, a file uses to represent colors by the numbers in the file. Colors themselves are "outside" one's computer in the "light domain". Your monitor profile is used by supporting programs (such as photoshop) to display those numbers on your screen properly. A generic profile is a good start, but if you want accuracy you might want to look into things like colorvision's Spyder to make a custom profile (on a regular basis) and to tweek your monitor (calibration as opposed to profiling). See colorvision.com . A profile gives information in how to convert the numbers in the file into the same color in the display device. Tell twenty people to buy you a "red" flower, you may get quite a few different colors. A profile converts your word "red" to the listener's concept of the word in his brain (may read "slightly orange'sh red to him). That way you both are understanding the same color. Your scanner profile is used by the scanning software to convert the colors detected by your scanner to the colors in a file's colorspace (say, AdobeRGB). When you print, the printer's profile is used to convert the file's colorspace (like AdobeRGB) into the colorspace of the printer. In other words, the colorspace you use (like adobeRGB) could be looked at as the file's colorspace and profiles are needed to convert data into that file's colorspace or out of the the file's colorspace. Out includes printers, your monitor screen, a film recorder, etc. More or less. There's some nice papers, etc at http://www.color.org/ which is the ICC of .ICC. :-) Mike P.S. - Yes it's a pain in the b*** to get everything right, but it's really cool once set up right. :-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I' m in color management HELL! PLease advise!
"Viken Karaguesian" wrote in message
... Here's my understanding of how things should work: If the monitor's color profile is set as the default profile in Windows XP Color Management, you should be able to turn off color management in all other software and get consistent results from scanner to image software and other applications. This is how my system is set. I have my monitor set as the default profile. I have turned off color management in my scanner software and in my imaging apps. Is this wrong? I'm working in the sRGB color space. Should I be loading a different ICC profile or colorspace. Turning off colour management in your scanner s/w would be a bad idea (assuming it is calibrated and works correctly.) The original scanned image needs an input colour profile, whatever colour space you end up working with. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I' m in color management HELL! PLease advise!
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:05:20 +0000 (UTC), "Nick"
wrote: "Viken Karaguesian" wrote in message ... Here's my understanding of how things should work: If the monitor's color profile is set as the default profile in Windows XP Color Management, you should be able to turn off color management in all other software and get consistent results from scanner to image software and other applications. This is how my system is set. I have my monitor set as the default profile. I have turned off color management in my scanner software and in my imaging apps. Is this wrong? I'm working in the sRGB color space. Should I be loading a different ICC profile or colorspace. Turning off colour management in your scanner s/w would be a bad idea (assuming it is calibrated and works correctly.) The original scanned image needs an input colour profile, whatever colour space you end up working with. I havent used a scanner for years now... but... One thing I always thought was rather silly was they didnt come with some form of profiling, I didnt realise this till I purchased CorelDraw which included a card with a nice picture on it that you scanned, and then used the profile software to then compare it with a "correct tiff" and then worked out if the colours were off so it could adjust for it. Would be nice if the scanners came with a card, and a bit of software to do the same... They (at least the old ones) did tend to have a lot of latitude, and even varied over time so it was always worth turning them on at least 5 mins before using and then re-calibrating after a couple of mins use. (god I must be showing my age by now, lol) -- Jonathan Wilson. www.somethingerotic.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I' m in color management HELL! PLease advise!
Jonathan Wilson wrote in message . ..
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:05:20 +0000 (UTC), "Nick" wrote: One thing I always thought was rather silly was they didnt come with some form of profiling, I didnt realise this till I purchased CorelDraw which included a card with a nice picture on it that you scanned, and then used the profile software to then compare it with a "correct tiff" and then worked out if the colours were off so it could adjust for it. Yes! When I opened it and saw that picture, I wondered what the heck it was for and filed it away. Much later when I discovered "color management" and *WANTED* that image, I couldn't find what I did with it. Know I didn't throw it away, I'm sure it's in a safe place, but it's TOO safe. :-) I have other ways to calibrate the scanner now, but it's amazing that I had what I wanted in hand, and didn't know it. :-) Mike P.S. - And I still don't know where it is. When I find it, it'll probably be faded. :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I' m in color management HELL! PLease advise! | Viken Karaguesian | Digital Photography | 7 | July 2nd 04 06:29 PM |
Mono Vs Tripod - advise, please. | Orville Wright | 35mm Photo Equipment | 6 | June 24th 04 08:10 PM |