If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Loffredo wrote in message ...
Ask if you want to know more... Thanks for the comments and confirming my suspicions. I looked at the negatives, and it's possible they are not as bad as the prints would indicate, so perhaps the bigger problem was the printing rather than the processing. I am not particularly interested in futzing about with chemicals, even though everyone keeps saying how easy and cheap it is. But just in case (and for the benefit of the untold millions of Usenet lurkers reading this thread), where is the best overview of what's involved? Cost, equipment and materials, space requirements, etc? And it still leaves printing, right? I have had more problems with crappy printing than with crappy processing. Is printing difficult and expensive? Thanks again. *UncaMikey |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strange printing results | Angus | Digital Photography | 0 | September 17th 04 03:04 AM |
Best Printing results: Kodak/Fuji Labs and Paper | Pingoleon | Film & Labs | 2 | August 15th 04 06:52 AM |
Kodak "Perfect Touch" processing -- VERY poor results! | John Salmon | Film & Labs | 15 | July 31st 04 11:19 PM |
Fortepan 400 in D76 1+1 | Frank Pittel | In The Darkroom | 1 | June 28th 04 02:00 AM |
OFFICIAL RESULTS: rec.photo.digital.moderated poll | Lionel | Digital Photography | 18 | June 25th 04 08:47 PM |