If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon's old 105mm f/2.8 micro-Nikkor showing its age
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:42:55 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote: The other lenses are clearly better. The Sony looks like the best here. https://petapixel.com/2020/04/20/ult...ikon-z-mounts/ Here is an example from 2008 using a Nikon 'AF Micro Nikkor 105mm 1:2.8' mounted on a D70 https://www.dropbox.com/s/vue55mbm8h...C0623.jpg?dl=0 and a cropped detail at https://www.dropbox.com/s/op2wtjhsc0...crop2.jpg?dl=0 Some of the mottled appearance is likely to be noise but in fact the camera has cropped the metallurgical grain structure of the coin. I am sure it would do better on the D750 but the lens's internal electrical have recently died and cannot be repaired. A pity. For a 25 year old lens it does very well. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon's old 105mm f/2.8 micro-Nikkor showing its age
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:02:40 +1200, Eric Stevens
wrote: On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:42:55 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote: The other lenses are clearly better. The Sony looks like the best here. https://petapixel.com/2020/04/20/ult...ikon-z-mounts/ Here is an example from 2008 using a Nikon 'AF Micro Nikkor 105mm 1:2.8' mounted on a D70 https://www.dropbox.com/s/vue55mbm8h...C0623.jpg?dl=0 and a cropped detail at https://www.dropbox.com/s/op2wtjhsc0...crop2.jpg?dl=0 Some of the mottled appearance is likely to be noise but in fact the camera has cropped the metallurgical grain structure of the coin. I am sure it would do better on the D750 but the lens's internal electrical have recently died and cannot be repaired. A pity. For a 25 year old lens it does very well. "Cropped"? No, 'captured'. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon's old 105mm f/2.8 micro-Nikkor showing its age
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:12:57 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote: On Tuesday, 21 April 2020 00:02:22 UTC-4, Eric Stevens wrote: On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:42:55 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote: The other lenses are clearly better. The Sony looks like the best here. https://petapixel.com/2020/04/20/ult...ikon-z-mounts/ Here is an example from 2008 using a Nikon 'AF Micro Nikkor 105mm 1:2.8' mounted on a D70 https://www.dropbox.com/s/vue55mbm8h...C0623.jpg?dl=0 and a cropped detail at https://www.dropbox.com/s/op2wtjhsc0...crop2.jpg?dl=0 Some of the mottled appearance is likely to be noise but in fact the camera has cropped the metallurgical grain structure of the coin. I am sure it would do better on the D750 but the lens's internal electrical have recently died and cannot be repaired. A pity. For a 25 year old lens it does very well. -- Regards, Eric Stevens Once you get down to the crystalline structure in the metal, it begins to break up light into its component colours, like a prism or reflection grating. Here is a shot using Nikon's 60mm macro, quite a decent lens for the price: https://pbase.com/andersonrm/image/113999802 Depth of focus is the problem. That's why I went for the 105mm. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nikon Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 VR vs. Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8D | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | June 25th 06 02:43 PM |
Nikon Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 VR vs. Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8D | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 15 | June 24th 06 11:09 PM |
Nikon Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 VR vs. Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8D | [email protected] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 1 | June 18th 06 01:27 PM |
Nikon Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 VR vs. Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8D | Alan Browne | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | June 17th 06 07:28 PM |
Nikon Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 VR vs. Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8D | Neil Harrington | Digital Photography | 0 | June 17th 06 01:53 PM |