If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Samsung's latest contribution to P&S mediocrity
SMS wrote:
Rich wrote: 26-624mm equivalent and (of course) the ubiquitous, crappy 1/2.33" P&S sensor. Plus raw mode and 3200 ISO. ISO 6400 for 3M or less, LOL. Can you even begin to imagine the noise in such an image? Doesn't matter. There's clearly a market for people who don't care at all about the quality of the image and are more concerned with having the most megapixels, the widest range zoom, and the biggest LCD. There isn't a person posting here who isn't willing to accept compromises in image quality in order to get a camera that they can use for an acceptable price. Some of them are arrogant snobs who think that only their compromises are acceptable. -- Ray Fischer |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Samsung's latest contribution to P&S mediocrity
Ray Fischer wrote:
There isn't a person posting here who isn't willing to accept compromises in image quality in order to get a camera that they can use for an acceptable price. Some of them are arrogant snobs who think that only their compromises are acceptable. True. It's all a question of which compromises you're willing to make. Still, advising people to avoid a camera with very high noise and a crappy lens (ignoring for a while all the other issues) doesn't necessarily make someone arrogant, nor a snob. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Samsung's latest contribution to P&S mediocrity
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:35:23 -0700, SMS
wrote: Ray Fischer wrote: There isn't a person posting here who isn't willing to accept compromises in image quality in order to get a camera that they can use for an acceptable price. Some of them are arrogant snobs who think that only their compromises are acceptable. True. It's all a question of which compromises you're willing to make. Still, advising people to avoid a camera with very high noise and a crappy lens (ignoring for a while all the other issues) doesn't necessarily make someone arrogant, nor a snob. If your judgment of a camera is solely based on the above, which you have chosen as the only important features, then yes, you could be termed a snob. Other features ( video, cost, ease of use, ect.ect.) are all valid features. That is unless you are a snob and believe that your criteria is all that should be considered. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Samsung's latest contribution to P&S mediocrity | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | September 1st 09 08:13 PM |
Samsung's latest contribution to P&S mediocrity | Dave Cohen | Digital Photography | 0 | September 1st 09 04:40 PM |
My humble contribution - wrapper script for dcraw (linux) | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 1 | April 1st 07 02:57 AM |
Is Samsung's 815....metal? | Rich | Digital Photography | 9 | November 26th 05 02:25 AM |
Samsung's 815 | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | June 4th 05 04:26 PM |