|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
September 1st 09, 08:13 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
Samsung's latest contribution to P&S mediocrity
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:27:28 -0700 (PDT), Rich
wrote: 26-624mm equivalent and (of course) the ubiquitous, crappy 1/2.33" P&S sensor. Plus raw mode and 3200 ISO. Can you even begin to imagine the noise in such an image? http://www.dpreview.com/news/0909/09...5000.asp#specs You seem to be SO occupied with P&S cameras that it makes one wonder......Hmmmm, could it be that you are so envious of the efficiencies of these cameras that you must find a way to justify your own camera preferences by bashing anything different? If you truly disliked P&S cameras you wouldn't keep posting thoughts about them. Any thoughts about them would just disappear. Why can't you disappear? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Samsung's latest contribution to P&S mediocrity | Dave Cohen | Digital Photography | 0 | September 1st 09 04:40 PM |
| My humble contribution - wrapper script for dcraw (linux) | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 1 | April 1st 07 02:57 AM |
| Is Samsung's 815....metal? | Rich | Digital Photography | 9 | November 26th 05 02:25 AM |
| Samsung's 815 | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | June 4th 05 04:26 PM |
Linear Mode
