A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Getting rid of the low-end to make the higher-end cheaper



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old March 3rd 12, 09:36 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
R. Mark Clayton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 334
Default Getting rid of the low-end to make the higher-end cheaper


"Rich" wrote in message
...
Irwell wrote in news:gxmq3ghqapmx.s8lo4gv00l8u$.dlg@
40tude.net:



Nobody is forcing you to buy plastic cameras. So don't.

Better yet, start the RichAMetalOnlyCameraCo.


RAMOCC? The mistakes go in before the name goes on.


It does exist, but they call it Leica.


Sell millions do they?


  #32  
Old March 6th 12, 08:54 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Chris Malcolm[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,142
Default Getting rid of the low-end to make the higher-end cheaper

David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Me writes:


I think my first camera (Ambi Silette) was a birthday present. My
father had a B&W darkroom, he'd buy outdated film cheaply and store it
in the fridge. One time he bought a massive roll of 35mm B&W negative
film packed in a large aluminium cine film can. For some obscure
reason (as I was only about 10 or 11 years old) I got the job of
working in pitch-black, unrolling, cutting, attaching it to reels,
rolling it up and fitting it into a stack of used 35mm cassettes
donated by the local camera store. The result was a few unexpected
fingerprints, more than a few loaded with the emulsion on the wrong
side, cassettes which could contain anything between about 20 to over
40 exposures and many with the film not attached properly to the
reel. Despite taking all care to allow for my sloppy workmanship, when
advancing the film, we'd frequently end up with the entire roll on the
take up spool with no way to rewind it, taking the camera home, and
working by feel in a dark sleeping bag in a dark cupboard, to load it
directly into the developing tank. The film was cheap, but the
"keeper" rate was abysmally low.


I started bulk-loading my own film around 1969, but I used bulk loaders,
rather than doing it entirely by hand. This pretty much avoids
wrong-way emulsions and fingerprints at least.


I was always afreaid of dropping a cassette and having the end pop off,
ruining an entire roll of film. Never actually happened though.


I've still got my old multi-pocket photographer's waistcoat the back
of which is a large dark bag pocket. Elasticated cuff sleeves get
inverted out from it so you can muck about with unexposed film, load
developing tanks, etc., without needing a darkroom.

--
Chris Malcolm
  #33  
Old March 8th 12, 06:23 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
David Dyer-Bennet
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,814
Default Getting rid of the low-end to make the higher-end cheaper

Chris Malcolm writes:

David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Me writes:


I think my first camera (Ambi Silette) was a birthday present. My
father had a B&W darkroom, he'd buy outdated film cheaply and store it
in the fridge. One time he bought a massive roll of 35mm B&W negative
film packed in a large aluminium cine film can. For some obscure
reason (as I was only about 10 or 11 years old) I got the job of
working in pitch-black, unrolling, cutting, attaching it to reels,
rolling it up and fitting it into a stack of used 35mm cassettes
donated by the local camera store. The result was a few unexpected
fingerprints, more than a few loaded with the emulsion on the wrong
side, cassettes which could contain anything between about 20 to over
40 exposures and many with the film not attached properly to the
reel. Despite taking all care to allow for my sloppy workmanship, when
advancing the film, we'd frequently end up with the entire roll on the
take up spool with no way to rewind it, taking the camera home, and
working by feel in a dark sleeping bag in a dark cupboard, to load it
directly into the developing tank. The film was cheap, but the
"keeper" rate was abysmally low.


I started bulk-loading my own film around 1969, but I used bulk loaders,
rather than doing it entirely by hand. This pretty much avoids
wrong-way emulsions and fingerprints at least.


I was always afreaid of dropping a cassette and having the end pop off,
ruining an entire roll of film. Never actually happened though.


I've still got my old multi-pocket photographer's waistcoat the back
of which is a large dark bag pocket. Elasticated cuff sleeves get
inverted out from it so you can muck about with unexposed film, load
developing tanks, etc., without needing a darkroom.


Wow, never had that in a vest. I've still got at least two changing
bags at home, though (kept them to be able to load 4x5 sheet film;
that's the last film camera I've kept).

I do know how to use a sportcoat as a changing bag, though.

--
David Dyer-Bennet, ; http://dd-b.net/
Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/
Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
Dragaera: http://dragaera.info
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cheaper to rent a car than a P&S!!! Rich Digital Photography 21 November 6th 06 01:16 PM
cheaper superzoom Tippi Digital Photography 16 June 10th 06 01:55 AM
Cheaper GAS! Save $$$$$$ [email protected] Digital Photography 0 May 6th 06 03:55 PM
D100 now cheaper than D70? RichA Digital SLR Cameras 22 April 26th 05 10:17 PM
Would D-70 get cheaper? y3k via PhotoKB.com Digital SLR Cameras 7 January 16th 05 06:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.