If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Getting rid of the low-end to make the higher-end cheaper
"Rich" wrote in message ... Irwell wrote in news:gxmq3ghqapmx.s8lo4gv00l8u$.dlg@ 40tude.net: Nobody is forcing you to buy plastic cameras. So don't. Better yet, start the RichAMetalOnlyCameraCo. RAMOCC? The mistakes go in before the name goes on. It does exist, but they call it Leica. Sell millions do they? |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Getting rid of the low-end to make the higher-end cheaper
David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Me writes: I think my first camera (Ambi Silette) was a birthday present. My father had a B&W darkroom, he'd buy outdated film cheaply and store it in the fridge. One time he bought a massive roll of 35mm B&W negative film packed in a large aluminium cine film can. For some obscure reason (as I was only about 10 or 11 years old) I got the job of working in pitch-black, unrolling, cutting, attaching it to reels, rolling it up and fitting it into a stack of used 35mm cassettes donated by the local camera store. The result was a few unexpected fingerprints, more than a few loaded with the emulsion on the wrong side, cassettes which could contain anything between about 20 to over 40 exposures and many with the film not attached properly to the reel. Despite taking all care to allow for my sloppy workmanship, when advancing the film, we'd frequently end up with the entire roll on the take up spool with no way to rewind it, taking the camera home, and working by feel in a dark sleeping bag in a dark cupboard, to load it directly into the developing tank. The film was cheap, but the "keeper" rate was abysmally low. I started bulk-loading my own film around 1969, but I used bulk loaders, rather than doing it entirely by hand. This pretty much avoids wrong-way emulsions and fingerprints at least. I was always afreaid of dropping a cassette and having the end pop off, ruining an entire roll of film. Never actually happened though. I've still got my old multi-pocket photographer's waistcoat the back of which is a large dark bag pocket. Elasticated cuff sleeves get inverted out from it so you can muck about with unexposed film, load developing tanks, etc., without needing a darkroom. -- Chris Malcolm |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Getting rid of the low-end to make the higher-end cheaper
Chris Malcolm writes:
David Dyer-Bennet wrote: Me writes: I think my first camera (Ambi Silette) was a birthday present. My father had a B&W darkroom, he'd buy outdated film cheaply and store it in the fridge. One time he bought a massive roll of 35mm B&W negative film packed in a large aluminium cine film can. For some obscure reason (as I was only about 10 or 11 years old) I got the job of working in pitch-black, unrolling, cutting, attaching it to reels, rolling it up and fitting it into a stack of used 35mm cassettes donated by the local camera store. The result was a few unexpected fingerprints, more than a few loaded with the emulsion on the wrong side, cassettes which could contain anything between about 20 to over 40 exposures and many with the film not attached properly to the reel. Despite taking all care to allow for my sloppy workmanship, when advancing the film, we'd frequently end up with the entire roll on the take up spool with no way to rewind it, taking the camera home, and working by feel in a dark sleeping bag in a dark cupboard, to load it directly into the developing tank. The film was cheap, but the "keeper" rate was abysmally low. I started bulk-loading my own film around 1969, but I used bulk loaders, rather than doing it entirely by hand. This pretty much avoids wrong-way emulsions and fingerprints at least. I was always afreaid of dropping a cassette and having the end pop off, ruining an entire roll of film. Never actually happened though. I've still got my old multi-pocket photographer's waistcoat the back of which is a large dark bag pocket. Elasticated cuff sleeves get inverted out from it so you can muck about with unexposed film, load developing tanks, etc., without needing a darkroom. Wow, never had that in a vest. I've still got at least two changing bags at home, though (kept them to be able to load 4x5 sheet film; that's the last film camera I've kept). I do know how to use a sportcoat as a changing bag, though. -- David Dyer-Bennet, ; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cheaper to rent a car than a P&S!!! | Rich | Digital Photography | 21 | November 6th 06 01:16 PM |
cheaper superzoom | Tippi | Digital Photography | 16 | June 10th 06 01:55 AM |
Cheaper GAS! Save $$$$$$ | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | May 6th 06 03:55 PM |
D100 now cheaper than D70? | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 22 | April 26th 05 10:17 PM |
Would D-70 get cheaper? | y3k via PhotoKB.com | Digital SLR Cameras | 7 | January 16th 05 06:45 PM |