If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable
Rich wrote:
On Jul 29, 11:05*pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: RichA wrote: Both cameras got "highly recommended." *Evidently, it's a highly flexible attribution. We'll be looking forward to your detailed review that justifies your slander. IQ letting you down again? The problem wasn't the review, it was the scoring of the review relative to others. You don't have a problem with the review - It's the review that you don't like. Got it. You're an idiot. -- Ray Fischer |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable
Twibil wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote: IQ letting you down again? *The problem wasn't the review, it was the scoring of the review relative to others. You don't have a problem with the review - It's the review that you don't like. Got it. You're an idiot. Well, no, from a disinterested observer's point of view his point is perfectly valid, but *you* don't seem to understand it. He doesn't like the review. He isn't smart enough to find anything wrong with it so he whines about the conclusion. -- Ray Fischer |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable
On 7/30/09 3:21 AM, in article , "Ray Fischer" wrote: Twibil wrote: (Ray Fischer) wrote: IQ letting you down again? *The problem wasn't the review, it was the scoring of the review relative to others. You don't have a problem with the review - It's the review that you don't like. Got it. You're an idiot. Well, no, from a disinterested observer's point of view his point is perfectly valid, but *you* don't seem to understand it. He doesn't like the review. He isn't smart enough to find anything wrong with it so he whines about the conclusion. POT = KETTLE |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable
George Kerby wrote:
"Twibil" On Jul 29, 11:34*pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: IQ letting you down again? *The problem wasn't the review, it was the scoring of the review relative to others. You don't have a problem with the review - It's the review that you don't like. Got it. You're an idiot. Well, no, from a disinterested observer's point of view his point is perfectly valid, but *you* don't seem to understand it. These isn't much out there that Fischer *does* understand. Obviously, you are unable to reply in a manner that would be considered reasonable to most folks: Just insults like a spoiled five year old. You just can't do any better. Sad. kerby in -- Ray Fischer |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable
Twibil wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote: Well, no, from a disinterested observer's point of view his point is perfectly valid, but *you* don't seem to understand it. He doesn't like the review. *He isn't smart enough to find anything wrong with it so he whines about the conclusion. Ah, got it. But how odd that you only seem able to read the minds of people you don't like, How odd that you seem to think that I'm "reading minds" when everyone can see him complaining about the conclusion. -- Ray Fischer |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable
Twibil wrote:
On Jul 30, 11:03*pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: Well, no, from a disinterested observer's point of view his point is perfectly valid, but *you* don't seem to understand it. He doesn't like the review. *He isn't smart enough to find anything wrong with it so he whines about the conclusion. Ah, got it. But how odd that you only seem able to read the minds of people you don't like, How odd that you seem to think that I'm "reading minds" when everyone can see him complaining about the conclusion. Oh, not odd at all. Follow the bouncing ball... Is this where you profess the ability to read minds? Firstly, you made a statement: "He isn't smart enough to find anything wrong with it so he whines about the conclusion." Now that could be either (A) mind-reading on your part or (B) a simple flame based on your fondest wishes and desires, but one having little or nothing to do with objective reality. It's a reasonably objective opinion based upon observing his past behavior. But you weren't _quite_ smart enough to consider that possibility. -- Ray Fischer |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable
On 7/31/09 12:01 PM, in article , "Ray Fischer" wrote: Twibil wrote: On Jul 30, 11:03*pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: Well, no, from a disinterested observer's point of view his point is perfectly valid, but *you* don't seem to understand it. He doesn't like the review. *He isn't smart enough to find anything wrong with it so he whines about the conclusion. Ah, got it. But how odd that you only seem able to read the minds of people you don't like, How odd that you seem to think that I'm "reading minds" when everyone can see him complaining about the conclusion. Oh, not odd at all. Follow the bouncing ball... Is this where you profess the ability to read minds? Firstly, you made a statement: "He isn't smart enough to find anything wrong with it so he whines about the conclusion." Now that could be either (A) mind-reading on your part or (B) a simple flame based on your fondest wishes and desires, but one having little or nothing to do with objective reality. It's a reasonably objective opinion based upon observing his past behavior. But you weren't _quite_ smart enough to consider that possibility. In your mind, FishBreath, NO one is as smart as you. Only in your own mind... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable
Twibil wrote:
On Jul 31, 10:01*am, (Ray Fischer) wrote: How odd that you seem to think that I'm "reading minds" when everyone can see him complaining about the conclusion. Oh, not odd at all. Follow the bouncing ball... Is this where you profess the ability to read minds? Er, no, it's where I employ a thing called "logic". See below. \I/ Firstly, you made a statement: "He isn't smart enough to find anything wrong with it so he whines about the conclusion." Now that could be either (A) mind-reading on your part or (B) a simple flame based on your fondest wishes and desires, but one having little or nothing to do with objective reality. It's a reasonably objective opinion based upon observing his past behavior. Free hint: We don't usually go to someone's enemies when we want to get an objective opinion. Non sequitur. Neither do we go to his best friends. We go to someone who's going to be objective. And that's not you. So you do try to read minds after all. But you weren't _quite_ smart enough to consider that possibility. The problem with relying on good old Usenet cliche' #3 ("You're stupid") is that it's just another masturbatory fantasy -unless perchance it's based on fact. Look in the mirror. -- Ray Fischer |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable
Twibil wrote:
On Jul 31, 8:16*pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: How odd that you seem to think that I'm "reading minds" when everyone can see him complaining about the conclusion. Oh, not odd at all. Follow the bouncing ball... Is this where you profess the ability to read minds? Er, no, it's where I employ a thing called "logic". See below. \I/ Firstly, you made a statement: "He isn't smart enough to find anything wrong with it so he whines about the conclusion." Now that could be either (A) mind-reading on your part or (B) a simple flame based on your fondest wishes and desires, but one having little or nothing to do with objective reality. It's a reasonably objective opinion based upon observing his past behavior. Free hint: We don't usually go to someone's enemies when we want to get an objective opinion. Non sequitur. Um, only if you don't know what "non-sequitur" means, and apparently you don't. I certainly do, and I even know that it's not hyphenated. But if you think that your comment is relevant then let's see your explanation. Neither do we go to his best friends. We go to someone who's going to be objective. And that's not you. So you do try to read minds after all. No, I just read posts and understand their content. Ditto. For instance: yours from earlier in the thread have quite clearly demonstrated that you dislike RichA, I dislike dishonest bigots. so therefore you fall into the "his enemies" category and no opinion of yours concerning him can be said to be objective. And so nothing you say about me is objective. -- Ray Fischer |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable | Ray Fischer | Digital SLR Cameras | 16 | August 14th 09 02:45 AM |
Dpreview's reviews "Highly Recommended" is highly questionable | The pixel Bandit | Digital Photography | 1 | July 30th 09 06:24 AM |
Dpreview's reviews "Highly Recommended" is highly questionable | The pixel Bandit | Digital SLR Cameras | 2 | July 30th 09 06:24 AM |
CHOKE! A Canon DSLR gets a "highly recommned - Just" on Dpreview! | Charles[_2_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | November 7th 08 12:51 AM |
Poor Pentax K10D. Just manages a "highly recommended" on dpreview | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 24 | December 21st 06 02:34 AM |