If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
blue dancing lights on the bride
There was one of those rotating balls with many colors of lights on the
ceiling that was rotating during the music. Well, some morone forgot to shut it off, and during the ceremony the blue circles are all around the bride, groom, and everyone else at the hupa [it was a jewish wedding]. Such crap piece of xxxx job I have never seen before. The bride's dress & face is blue! You could actually see the dancing lights on the people. The bride's maids look like they got blue make up on. This would be acceptable during the dancing with the music and such, but NOT during the "do you take this blue ray of light"... "yes, rabbi blueman, I accept this blue woman to be my lawfully wedded bride in the blue-man group" part. Interestingly, I did not notice any blue lights during the ceremony, and neither did anyone else. I showed the video to a few people who were there and no one recalled seeing any lights. Is it possible the camera picked up something people cant see? ultra-violet perhaps? Would this be considered the photog's or the hall's fault? They should've shut off those lights even if they cant be seen. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
blue dancing lights on the bride
Bolshoy Huy wrote: There was one of those rotating balls with many colors of lights on the ceiling that was rotating during the music. Well, some morone forgot to shut it off, and during the ceremony the blue circles are all around the bride, groom, and everyone else at the hupa [it was a jewish wedding]. Such crap piece of xxxx job I have never seen before. The bride's dress & face is blue! You could actually see the dancing lights on the people. The bride's maids look like they got blue make up on. This would be acceptable during the dancing with the music and such, but NOT during the "do you take this blue ray of light"... "yes, rabbi blueman, I accept this blue woman to be my lawfully wedded bride in the blue-man group" part. Interestingly, I did not notice any blue lights during the ceremony, and neither did anyone else. I showed the video to a few people who were there and no one recalled seeing any lights. Is it possible the camera picked up something people cant see? ultra-violet perhaps? Would this be considered the photog's or the hall's fault? They should've shut off those lights even if they cant be seen. Antizionism ? P.S. Mine is bigger. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
blue dancing lights on the bride
"Bolshoy Huy" wrote in message Would this be considered the photog's or the hall's fault? They should've shut off those lights even if they cant be seen. If there were in fact, blue lights, the photographer should have noticed and asked that they be turned off. He is supposed to be a professional and that is what he gets paid to do. If it was some strange, not visible to the eye light, that may be another story, but the photo/video guy must have some sort of preview screen on the camera to see it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
blue dancing lights on the bride
On 11 Jan 2006 15:16:50 -0800, "Bolshoy Huy"
wrote: There was one of those rotating balls with many colors of lights on the ceiling that was rotating during the music. Well, some morone forgot to shut it off, and during the ceremony the blue circles are all around the bride, groom, and everyone else at the hupa [it was a jewish wedding]. Such crap piece of xxxx job I have never seen before. The bride's dress & face is blue! You could actually see the dancing lights on the people. The bride's maids look like they got blue make up on. This would be acceptable during the dancing with the music and such, but NOT during the "do you take this blue ray of light"... "yes, rabbi blueman, I accept this blue woman to be my lawfully wedded bride in the blue-man group" part. Interestingly, I did not notice any blue lights during the ceremony, and neither did anyone else. I showed the video to a few people who were there and no one recalled seeing any lights. Is it possible the camera picked up something people cant see? ultra-violet perhaps? Would this be considered the photog's or the hall's fault? They should've shut off those lights even if they cant be seen. Were you the only one doing any photos or video? How could it be the photog's fault? People not remembering the lights isn't hard to believe. They see what they want to see. Sometime, if you get the chance, see what different witnesses to a car crash report. You'll wonder if they saw the same crash! -- Bill Funk Replace "g" with "a" funktionality.blogspot.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
blue dancing lights on the bride
"Were you the only one doing any photos or video?
--I was the groom's bro, as such not doing any photos or video. I was right besides him. How could it be the photog's fault? --he shot a video with blue dancing lights in everyone's faces. People not remembering the lights isn't hard to believe. They see what they want to see. --and the bride doesnt want to see a blue light on her face or dress. who should be blamed or sued here? the photog or the hall? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
blue dancing lights on the bride
On 12 Jan 2006 07:20:31 -0800, "Bolshoy Huy"
wrote: "Were you the only one doing any photos or video? --I was the groom's bro, as such not doing any photos or video. I was right besides him. I'm sorry, it seemed from the OP that you were the photographer. OK, let's rephrase: was thewre only one person doing photos/video? Why the question? Because you asked, "Is it possible the camera picked up something people cant see? ultra-violet perhaps?" So, were there any other people shooting? What do their shots show? Plus, of course, there's still the question of whether or not the people could see the lights, and just ignored them. How could it be the photog's fault? --he shot a video with blue dancing lights in everyone's faces. And the alternative was, what? No video? Shoot between the blue lights? People not remembering the lights isn't hard to believe. They see what they want to see. --and the bride doesnt want to see a blue light on her face or dress. who should be blamed or sued here? the photog or the hall? Why the photographer? What *else* should he have done? He doesn't have the right to tell the hall to turn the lights off, that's up to the people who hired the hall. So, IMO, it can't be the photographer's fault. The hall? Were they told to turn the light off? Who had control of the light? -- Bill Funk Replace "g" with "a" funktionality.blogspot.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
blue dancing lights on the bride
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trouble Reproducing the Color Purple | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 29 | January 1st 06 08:53 PM |
Incandescent setting on Nikon 990 gives blue cast | Bill Smith | Digital Photography | 12 | January 4th 05 12:32 PM |
Incandescent setting on Nikon 990 gives blue cast | Bill Smith | Digital Photography | 0 | January 3rd 05 08:32 AM |
Black and White (and Blue) | embee | Digital Photography | 17 | December 13th 04 12:55 PM |
Good starting set of studio lights for Nikon D100 | Charlie Self | Digital Photography | 11 | July 16th 04 08:21 AM |