If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Stereoscopic galaxy NGC3370
Thank you (^_^)
M-M wrote: In article .com, "tontoko" wrote: Surely there isn't parallax enough to cause stereoscopic effect since every star or galaxy has virtually "infinite" distance from the camera. My software converts the dimness of the image to the distance from the camera. Practically the galaxy or nebula is thought to have some fractal structure and it causes blurry on the image taken by the camera when the part of it is more distant from other parts. The following image is an example of synthesized stereograph for a fractal structure. As seen on it, more detailed, more distant it looks like. http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/i...e=post&id=2049 That one is very easy to see, and quite effective. The galaxy is better if I reduce the size to 50% of original so onscreen the (dual) image is no more than 5 inches wide. At least that is the way my eyes work. Nice work! -- m-m |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stereoscopic Sombrero Galaxy | tontoko | Digital Photography | 0 | December 18th 06 12:17 AM |
Stereoscopic SN1994D | tontoko | Digital Photography | 0 | December 15th 06 11:45 PM |
Stereoscopic NGC7009 | tontoko | Digital Photography | 0 | December 14th 06 06:29 AM |
Stereoscopic Photography | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 27 | November 17th 05 04:18 AM |
Stereoscopic view of nebulae | tontoko | Digital Photography | 20 | January 11th 05 06:45 AM |