If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
26 Reasons to Choose a P&S Over a DSLR
"Bob Larter" wrote in message ... Charles E Hardwidge wrote: "Bob Larter" wrote in message ... Charles E Hardwidge wrote: "Bob Larter" wrote in message ... Paul Furman wrote: "A HAND-HELD 2197mm f/3.5 image from a P&S camera (downsized only, no crop): http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3141/...1dbdb8ac_o.jpg " :-) Simply astonishing!!!! If only we had superman skills & clever inexpensive gear like that. grin 1) The focus is on the brids tail, not its head, 2) The eye isn't visible, 3) Noisy, 4) No shadow detail. There's some green and purple crap on the grey feathers, and some green crap in the extreme bottom right corner. I was being kind. ;^) I don't really like to criticise but your comment prompted me to take another look. I don't have anything to compare it with but there's, also, sensor artefacts (if that's what those lines are) covering the whole thing. The camera obviously has its limits and the shot itself doesn't make the best of those. It's crawling with sharpening glitches as well, which does help any. I'm not quite sure what to look for so I'll take your word on that. I know my A590 sensor and lens has limits whether CHDK raw or JPEG, and I've had a play with noise reduction in post. CHDK raw and Noise Ninja are definitely better than the JPEG but fixing a complex shot is more difficult. A better and less noisy camera is on the cards further down the line but I'm just treating things now as a learning exercise. -- Charles E Hardwidge |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
26 Reasons to Choose a P&S Over a DSLR
Playin' Wid Da Trolls wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:54:50 +0200, Wolfgang Weisselberg A 72mm lens. On a 5.9x crop sensor. know. Do take the shallow DOF into account. I recall the OP of that photo saying the twigs behind the bird were only about 5 ft. away. Work out the true f/ratio in your pea-brain from that if you must. According to the EXIF it's 3.5 and the focal length is 72mm. On a 5.9x crop sensor. And what *you* "recall" someone /said/ says more about you ... You ****in' psychotic fool. .... found out again. -Wolfgang |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Idiot troll
DRS wrote,on my timestamp of 14/07/2009 8:09 AM:
Of course, it would also help if people would remove r.p.d from the cross-posting list because that's where the idiot lives. I've taken to filtering every thread that is cross-posted to there and my crap post count has dropped about 90%. Don't expect this bunch of scammers to stop cross-posting anytime, even though they'll readily admit doing so... |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
26 Reasons to Choose a P&S Over a DSLR
Art Deco wrote:
On Jul 14, 3:44 am, Bob Larter wrote: P 'n S Envy wrote: On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:14:53 +1000, Bob Larter wrote: Charles E Hardwidge wrote: "Bob Larter" wrote in message ... Paul Furman wrote: "A HAND-HELD 2197mm f/3.5 image from a P&S camera (downsized only, no crop): http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3141/3060429818_b01dbdb8ac_o.jpg" :-) Simply astonishing!!!! If only we had superman skills & clever inexpensive gear like that. grin 1) The focus is on the brids tail, not its head, 2) The eye isn't visible, 3) Noisy, 4) No shadow detail. There's some green and purple crap on the grey feathers, and some green crap in the extreme bottom right corner. I was being kind. ;^) Right on demand, more sour grapes! LOL We're still waiting for any kind of image at all taken at just 1800mm focal-length at f/3.5 from ANY DSLR, let alone over 2100mm at f/3.5. Let's see one of yours from an 1800mm P&S, kook. ;^) Just for clarification, that's not my photo. Gosh, what a surprise. I'm still looking forward to seeing one of those amazing photos of *yours* that you keep on wanking about. -- Lionel Show P n S Envy your photo of you in your new "Red Corset": http://sex4adults.net/shemalerevenge...d-galls/12.jpg -- Art Deco |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Idiot troll
Oh The TROLLS wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:36:17 GMT, "Charles E Hardwidge" wrote: I have no idea if you're American but your service provider is, and the last time I checked impersonation on the internet was a criminal offence in America. http://www.ic3.gov/ Impersonation would matter if you had anything important to ever say. Don't flatter yourself. Ah, but now the real Vance would have a legitimate right to send a complaint to the following and get your Minnesotan ass a spanking. X-Complaints-To: X-DMCA-Complaints-To: X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly -- Len |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
25 Reasons to Choose a P&S Camera Instead Of an Overpriced DSLR | A REAL-Pro Photographer | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | November 8th 08 02:36 AM |
25 Reasons to Choose a P&S Camera Instead Of an Overpriced DSLR | A REAL-Pro Photographer | Other Photographic Equipment | 3 | November 8th 08 02:36 AM |
25 Reasons to Choose a P&S Camera Instead Of an Overpriced DSLR | A REAL-Pro Photographer | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | November 5th 08 09:10 AM |
25 Reasons to Choose a P&S Camera Instead Of an Overpriced DSLR | A REAL-Pro Photographer | Other Photographic Equipment | 0 | November 5th 08 09:10 AM |