If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Could North Korea fly it's 6-10 weapons on commercial airliners to targets on the West Coast?
In article ,
Bill Funk wrote: On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:08:13 -0400, Shawn Hirn wrote: In article om, "Axis of WhoCares" wrote: If the US could drop a Fat Man bomb back in WWII, how hard would it be for RNK to retro-fit several commercial airliners to hold a single nuclear weapon. Using suicide pilots on a normal, scheduled flight plan across the ocean and striking targets such as Anchorage, LA, Seattle, Portland etc? Why bother? Considering how open our ports are and what a bunch of boobs we have in the White House, all the N. Koreans need to do is send a nuclear device to us via freighter. While it's ceretainly possible (and has been for decades), why would they? NK isn't among those few who think dying for a cause is preferable to living. Their nuclear capability is for defense (as blackmail, so to speak). It's dangerous, because their Great Leader is certifiably crazy, but the idea that they/he will actually deliver a nuclear device to the US as a first trike has little basis in reality. You make a good point. The real concern here is that we now have on our hands, a poor country with a resource (nuclear weapons) that many wealthy countries would be willing to pay a lot of money for. Bush is talking about economic sanctions; however, I fear that its too late for that. The time to deal with N. Korea was two years ago, not now. Now, N. Korea is in the driver's seat and they can make a mint selling nuclear weapons technology to countries such as Iran and Saudi Arabia and there isn't a damned thing Bush and his new pals in the United Nations can do about it. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Could North Korea fly it's 6-10 weapons on commercial airliners to targets on the West Coast?
In article ,
Gunner wrote: On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:08:13 -0400, Shawn Hirn wrote: In article om, "Axis of WhoCares" wrote: If the US could drop a Fat Man bomb back in WWII, how hard would it be for RNK to retro-fit several commercial airliners to hold a single nuclear weapon. Using suicide pilots on a normal, scheduled flight plan across the ocean and striking targets such as Anchorage, LA, Seattle, Portland etc? Why bother? Considering how open our ports are and what a bunch of boobs we have in the White House, all the N. Koreans need to do is send a nuclear device to us via freighter. Odd..it didnt appear that the boobs in the Whitehouse during the Clinton Administration did much with the import of any substance or device via freighter either. Why is that? The risk wasn't there and we did not have nearly as many nations putting the United States on their hit list. Bush has managed to **** off hundreds of millions of people all over the world. Clinton wasn't perfect, but we did not have an escalation of nuclear power under him, nor do we have the severe chaos in the Middle East that we have now. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Could North Korea fly it's 6-10 weapons on commercial airliners to targets on the West Coast?
In article ,
Tim May wrote: In article om, Axis of WhoCares wrote: If the US could drop a Fat Man bomb back in WWII, how hard would it be for RNK to retro-fit several commercial airliners to hold a single nuclear weapon. Using suicide pilots on a normal, scheduled flight plan across the ocean and striking targets such as Anchorage, LA, Seattle, Portland etc? Please do not further discuss operational intelligence! The strike on these centers of welfarism, decadence, and homosexuality may be the only way Middle America can recover. Do not interference with the Will of a Vengeful God. --Tim May Vegenful God? I thought God was supposed to be loving. If God is all knowing, why didn't He, She, or It head off this problem before it started? For that matter, why did God create the flaws in humans that lead us to have so many homosexuals and welfare recipients? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Could North Korea fly it's 6-10 weapons on commercialairliners to targets on the West Coast?
On 10/9/06 5:07 PM, in article , "Shawn Hirn" wrote: In article , Gunner wrote: On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:08:13 -0400, Shawn Hirn wrote: In article om, "Axis of WhoCares" wrote: If the US could drop a Fat Man bomb back in WWII, how hard would it be for RNK to retro-fit several commercial airliners to hold a single nuclear weapon. Using suicide pilots on a normal, scheduled flight plan across the ocean and striking targets such as Anchorage, LA, Seattle, Portland etc? Why bother? Considering how open our ports are and what a bunch of boobs we have in the White House, all the N. Koreans need to do is send a nuclear device to us via freighter. Odd..it didnt appear that the boobs in the Whitehouse during the Clinton Administration did much with the import of any substance or device via freighter either. Why is that? The risk wasn't there and we did not have nearly as many nations putting the United States on their hit list. Bush has managed to **** off hundreds of millions of people all over the world. Clinton wasn't perfect, but we did not have an escalation of nuclear power under him, nor do we have the severe chaos in the Middle East that we have now. Sorry, you are either uninformed or are a Bush-whacker. Maybe both: http://www.boston.com/news/world/asi...nology_of_nort h_koreas_nuclear_weapons_development/ It is clear that BUBBA played a central role in appeasing the Midget Madman. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Could North Korea fly it's 6-10 weapons on commercial airliners to targets on the West Coast?
Robert Sturgeon wrote:
If the deal includes less Federal regulations, less Federal controls, less Federal bull**** in general, you bet _I_ do want less Federal welfare. But still -- why should those abused, over-taxed blue staters CARE what red state farmers want? (I happen to be a blue state farmer -- not that I'm happy that my state is a blue state.) If the blue staters are paying too much in Federal welfare to the red staters, why don't they demand to pay less? Why won't you answer that? Are you aware of how politics works? Blue states could demand to pay less in subsidies to red state farmers, but such legislation would never pass the Senate, where each tiny (in terms of population) red state has as much power as a populous blue state. The farming lobby has too much power to allow something like this. -Gniewko |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Could North Korea fly it's 6-10 weapons on commercial airliners to targets on the West Coast?
"Bill Funk" wrote in message ... On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:19:06 GMT, "Mysterion" wrote: "Axis of WhoCares" wrote in message oups.com... If the US could drop a Fat Man bomb back in WWII, how hard would it be for RNK to retro-fit several commercial airliners to hold a single nuclear weapon. Using suicide pilots on a normal, scheduled flight plan across the ocean and striking targets such as Anchorage, LA, Seattle, Portland etc? Even well hidden and shielded warheads can be found using neutrino detectors. Are they used on airliners? I've seen them used in helicopters by flying over an area. They can be mounted in a wide variety of vehicles or stationary. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Could North Korea fly it's 6-10 weapons on commercial airliners to targets on the West Coast?
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:54:51 GMT, Tankfixer
wrote: In article om, mumbled If the US could drop a Fat Man bomb back in WWII, how hard would it be for RNK to retro-fit several commercial airliners to hold a single nuclear weapon. Using suicide pilots on a normal, scheduled flight plan across the ocean and striking targets such as Anchorage, LA, Seattle, Portland etc? Besides the fact there are no scheduelde flights from North Korea to any of those citites ? Then there is the issue of N. Korea not having any airliners with the necessary range to make it that far. -- There can be no triumph without loss. No victory without suffering. No freedom without sacrifice. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Could North Korea fly it's 6-10 weapons on commercial airliners to targets on the West Coast?
There is no smuggle proof system or borders.
The real fear here is we all know anything can be smuggle if you have the Will, the Cash, And a Brilliant mind to plan it. Just because North Korea is poor and lead by a Hell bent Mad Man doesn't mean some mother over there can't give birth to a rather smart child. North Korea has its best and brightest like all other nations. If you REALLY REALLY want to smuggle something and have the money and human resources, it can be done. With that said, imagine the impact if 3 nukes were detonated in major US cities. Wake up one lazy sunday morning, turn on the news and see LA, New York and Chicago reduced to radioactive rubble. I doubt too many people are going to keep there downtown jobs or condos much longer. Nation wide fear of cities could be our own undoing, the nukes just push us off the edge. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Could North Korea fly it's 6-10 weapons on commercial airliners to targets on the West Coast?
As I said before, anyone with money can lease a private jet which then
can be loaded with anything you want and then fly it to any city in the United States. If you live where there is a major airport, you are a potential target....and you have been since 9/11. Welcome to the real world. TMT Colin Campbell (remove underscore) wrote: On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:54:51 GMT, Tankfixer wrote: In article om, mumbled If the US could drop a Fat Man bomb back in WWII, how hard would it be for RNK to retro-fit several commercial airliners to hold a single nuclear weapon. Using suicide pilots on a normal, scheduled flight plan across the ocean and striking targets such as Anchorage, LA, Seattle, Portland etc? Besides the fact there are no scheduelde flights from North Korea to any of those citites ? Then there is the issue of N. Korea not having any airliners with the necessary range to make it that far. -- There can be no triumph without loss. No victory without suffering. No freedom without sacrifice. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
West Virginia Photography | Forest Wanderer | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | August 17th 06 09:14 PM |
OT North Korea can hit the western US with nuke...thanks Democrats | Ron Hunter | Digital Photography | 51 | May 3rd 05 04:57 AM |