Could North Korea fly it's 6-10 weapons on commercial airliners to targets on the West Coast?

"Axis of WhoCares" wrote in message
ps.com...
If the US could drop a Fat Man bomb back in WWII, how hard would it be
for RNK to retro-fit several commercial airliners to hold a single
nuclear weapon. Using suicide pilots on a normal, scheduled flight plan
across the ocean and striking targets such as Anchorage, LA, Seattle,
Portland etc?

Even well hidden and shielded warheads can be found using neutrino
detectors.

Tim May wrote:
In article , Bob uecker
wrote:

"Tim May" wrote in message
...
In article om, Axis
of WhoCares wrote:

If the US could drop a Fat Man bomb back in WWII, how hard would it be
for RNK to retro-fit several commercial airliners to hold a single
nuclear weapon. Using suicide pilots on a normal, scheduled flight plan
across the ocean and striking targets such as Anchorage, LA, Seattle,
Portland etc?


Please do not further discuss operational intelligence!

The strike on these centers of welfarism, decadence, and homosexuality
may be the only way Middle America can recover.

Do not interference with the Will of a Vengeful God.

What the **** is decedent about Portland? Is there really people in
Anchorage? LOL.

I said "decadent," not "decedent," though that may apply to those about
to be purified with thermonuclear fire.

Jesus christ dude


Learn to capitalize and punctuate properly.

LOL This to the guy who answered this bit of your creativity:
"Do not interference with the Will of a Vengeful God."
Neither 'will' nor 'vengeful' should be capitalized; 'god' however is
up to the poster. As for 'interference' ....
Shouldn't you do penance or scourge yourself or something?

In article om,
"Axis of WhoCares" wrote:

If the US could drop a Fat Man bomb back in WWII, how hard would it be
for RNK to retro-fit several commercial airliners to hold a single
nuclear weapon. Using suicide pilots on a normal, scheduled flight plan
across the ocean and striking targets such as Anchorage, LA, Seattle,
Portland etc?

Why bother? Considering how open our ports are and what a bunch of boobs
we have in the White House, all the N. Koreans need to do is send a
nuclear device to us via freighter.

In article .com,
"Martin Brown" wrote:

Jeff Burke wrote:
On 8 Oct 2006 21:47:25 -0700, "Axis of WhoCares" wrote:

If the US could drop a Fat Man bomb back in WWII, how hard would it be
for RNK to retro-fit several commercial airliners to hold a single
nuclear weapon. Using suicide pilots on a normal, scheduled flight plan
across the ocean and striking targets such as Anchorage, LA, Seattle,
Portland etc?

They'd use FedEX of DHL.

Depends if they want it to arrive in good working order. International
shippers are not always kind to camera gear or scientific
instruments....

My money is on flag of convenience freighter if they really are crazy
enough to try and deliver one. San Diego & LA would be prime targets. A
50kT groundburst would not have as much instantaneous destructive power
as an airburst, but it would make a lot more mess.

Pity that we are tied down on a wild goose chase for fantasy WMD in
Iraq and not paying anything like enough attention to the very real
regional threat from N Korea.

Yup, and it wouldn't surprise me if N. Korean starts selling its nuclear
weapons technology to Iran and anyone else who wants it for the right
price. Iran feels it needs nuclear weapons fast, N. Korean has what Iran
needs. N. Korea needs cash. Iran has more cash then it knows what to do
with. You figure it out.

So to those Bush supporters out there, please explain to me again how we
are safer now from a mass terrorist attack then we were before 9/11.

I just don't get it.

Or use a private jet to deliver an nuclear airburst over New York City?

And who would you blame since so many people who have or will have
nuclear capability hate the United States compliments of the Bush
Adminstration?

The world just got alot more dangerous to live in.

Keep voting Republican and you will find out.....

TMT



Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article om,
"Axis of WhoCares" wrote:

If the US could drop a Fat Man bomb back in WWII, how hard would it be
for RNK to retro-fit several commercial airliners to hold a single
nuclear weapon. Using suicide pilots on a normal, scheduled flight plan
across the ocean and striking targets such as Anchorage, LA, Seattle,
Portland etc?

Why bother? Considering how open our ports are and what a bunch of boobs
we have in the White House, all the N. Koreans need to do is send a
nuclear device to us via freighter.

On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:08:13 -0400, Shawn Hirn wrote:

In article om,
"Axis of WhoCares" wrote:

If the US could drop a Fat Man bomb back in WWII, how hard would it be
for RNK to retro-fit several commercial airliners to hold a single
nuclear weapon. Using suicide pilots on a normal, scheduled flight plan
across the ocean and striking targets such as Anchorage, LA, Seattle,
Portland etc?

Why bother? Considering how open our ports are and what a bunch of boobs
we have in the White House, all the N. Koreans need to do is send a
nuclear device to us via freighter.

Odd..it didnt appear that the boobs in the Whitehouse during the Clinton
Administration did much with the import of any substance or device via
freighter either. Why is that?

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner

On 8 Oct 2006 21:47:25 -0700, "Axis of WhoCares"
wrote:

If the US could drop a Fat Man bomb back in WWII, how hard would it be
for RNK to retro-fit several commercial airliners to hold a single
nuclear weapon. Using suicide pilots on a normal, scheduled flight plan
across the ocean and striking targets such as Anchorage, LA, Seattle,
Portland etc?

The weapon supposedly weighed in at 10 tons. That's a hefty load for
an airliner.

Think cargo ship and you've got a viable scenario.

Cheers,

LiRM

Tim May wrote:
In article om, Axis
of WhoCares wrote:
The strike on these centers of welfarism, decadence, and homosexuality
may be the only way Middle America can recover.

Do not interference with the Will of a Vengeful God.

These "centers of welfarism, decadence, and homosexuality" are engines
of economic growth that pay taxes that support lazy, backward,
unproductive Middle America. The blue states pay much more in taxes
than they get back from the federal government, and the difference goes
to subsidize poor red states. Those are the real centers of
"welfarism".

-Gniewko

On 9 Oct 2006 08:52:42 -0700, wrote:

Tim May wrote:
In article om, Axis
of WhoCares wrote:
The strike on these centers of welfarism, decadence, and homosexuality
may be the only way Middle America can recover.

Do not interference with the Will of a Vengeful God.

These "centers of welfarism, decadence, and homosexuality" are engines
of economic growth that pay taxes that support lazy, backward,
unproductive Middle America. The blue states pay much more in taxes
than they get back from the federal government, and the difference goes
to subsidize poor red states. Those are the real centers of
"welfarism".

If that's so, why don't those blue staters demand lower
Federal taxes and less Federal welfare??? The red staters
would agree, and we'd all have lower Federal taxes and less
Federal welfare. So what are those abused, over-taxed blue
staters waiting for???

--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/

Robert Sturgeon wrote:
On 9 Oct 2006 08:52:42 -0700, wrote:

Tim May wrote:
In article om, Axis
of WhoCares wrote:
The strike on these centers of welfarism, decadence, and homosexuality
may be the only way Middle America can recover.

Do not interference with the Will of a Vengeful God.

These "centers of welfarism, decadence, and homosexuality" are engines
of economic growth that pay taxes that support lazy, backward,
unproductive Middle America. The blue states pay much more in taxes
than they get back from the federal government, and the difference goes
to subsidize poor red states. Those are the real centers of
"welfarism".

If that's so, why don't those blue staters demand lower
Federal taxes and less Federal welfare??? The red staters
would agree, and we'd all have lower Federal taxes and less
Federal welfare. So what are those abused, over-taxed blue
staters waiting for???

Hah hah hah! Let me wait a minute to stop laughing. Red states want
LESS federal welfare?! What planet are you from? Just try to take away
federal subsidies to red-state farmers and see what happens.

-Gniewko