If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Very quick review of the Pentax K1 Mark II
Got it yesterday, and took some test shots. The IBIS appears to work
great - 1/30th sec at 300mm, and the photos are pretty sharp. The IQ and color also seem fine. Shots up to ISO 6400 are pretty clean, but if you zoom to 2:1, there is noise at that ISO. 1:1 looks pretty good. When I get some time to check it more thoroughly, I will look at the focus tracking. It's probably pointless - there are lots of reviews of the camera, and although it's better than the first K1, no one thinks it's very good, at least for subjects moving towards the camera. I also need to look into the astrotracer and pixel shift, but those things aren't very important right now. I tried an old film lens from the early 90's expecting a lot of CA, but there was none. Very strange, and I would think unrelated to the camera, but that gives me a useful lens. One thing I love about Pentax is the backward compatibility with lenses. I found an old Tamron 2x TC, also from the film days. No AF, no aperture control, but it does have focus confirmation, and it does give me a 600mm reach if I really need it. The camera was used at B&H, but in perfect condition. For $1650, a FF camera would have to be pretty bad for me to regret the purchase. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Very quick review of the Pentax K1 Mark II
On Aug 17, 2018, Bill W wrote
(in ): Got it yesterday, and took some test shots. The IBIS appears to work great - 1/30th sec at 300mm, and the photos are pretty sharp. The IQ and color also seem fine. Shots up to ISO 6400 are pretty clean, but if you zoom to 2:1, there is noise at that ISO. 1:1 looks pretty good. When I get some time to check it more thoroughly, I will look at the focus tracking. It's probably pointless - there are lots of reviews of the camera, and although it's better than the first K1, no one thinks it's very good, at least for subjects moving towards the camera. I also need to look into the astrotracer and pixel shift, but those things aren't very important right now. I tried an old film lens from the early 90's expecting a lot of CA, but there was none. Very strange, and I would think unrelated to the camera, but that gives me a useful lens. One thing I love about Pentax is the backward compatibility with lenses. I found an old Tamron 2x TC, also from the film days. No AF, no aperture control, but it does have focus confirmation, and it does give me a 600mm reach if I really need it. The camera was used at B&H, but in perfect condition. For $1650, a FF camera would have to be pretty bad for me to regret the purchase. Have fun. -- Regards, Savageduck |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon 5D Mark III and Nikon D800 Review - By Fred Miranda | David J Taylor[_16_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 6 | April 28th 12 01:32 PM |
CANON EOS 1D MARK IV REVIEW - Amateur Photographer | Will T | Digital Photography | 1 | August 11th 10 02:11 PM |
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III Review | Mr.Roy | Digital Photography | 0 | September 28th 07 06:49 PM |
Quick Canon EOS 300D/ Digital Rebel Review | Todd H. | Digital Photography | 0 | September 21st 04 10:41 PM |
Review of Canon 1D Mark II | Bill Hilton | Photographing Nature | 0 | March 29th 04 09:27 PM |