If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
See, this image I'd criticize, even though it was published
RichA wrote:
Why? Because the exposure was too long, given an completely unrealistic rendition of the lights. Also, northern lights have very intricate detail which was wiped out in this image because the lights move and 30 seconds produced a more or less amorphous blur. IMO, it's a post-card or tourism image and not a good image of the subject itself. http://www.dpreview.com/forums/threa...-post-56640250 Are you daft? (Okay, no need to answer that; just reading the above, or almost anything else you ever post, tells all.) Suffice to say you can't even give an accurate description of Aurora. "Unrealistic" my ass. The "intricate detail" comment says you've been watching too much television and not enough Aurora! Many many times, more often than not, there is almost no detail at all, much less "intricate detail". -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/ Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ikebana photos (37)- please criticize | Celcius | Digital SLR Cameras | 9 | November 4th 07 11:34 PM |
Dpreview just can't bring itself to criticize Canon | Rich | Digital Photography | 35 | October 17th 07 02:59 PM |
Getting published | Thistlegroup | Photographing Nature | 30 | May 31st 04 11:31 PM |
Getting Published | Thistlegroup | Large Format Photography Equipment | 0 | April 2nd 04 10:33 PM |
Getting published | Thistlegroup | In The Darkroom | 0 | April 2nd 04 10:29 PM |