Latest updates of Windows 10 and CC Light Room

In article , PeterN
wrote:

read your own statement: pray tell us what yo were talking about,
if not
windows 19.
" it's possible to defer it but that would be stupid, especially
now, on
the verge of threshold being released."

you're stupider than i thought, which already was rather stupid.

Your opinion is of little consequence to me, Especially when you
misuse words.

no words were misused.

An educated person - a product of the University of Wisconsin, for
example - would use "more stupid". "Stupider" is marginally
acceptable, but a mark of a ill-educated person.

an educated person would discuss the actual topic and not argue about
word usage or hurl insults.

an educated person would find that stupider is in several dictionaries:
https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=stupider
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/stupider
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/stupider
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/stupid

that makes you the stupid one.


While it may be in a dictionary it is an awkward spoken comparative that
sounds very stupid when spoken and looks stupid written.

That said, you're right that Tony is side tracking with such.

And if anyone knows sidetracking it's nospam. This guy has the balls to
complain about sidetracking, while sidetracking because of an obvious typo.


this was never about typos. i only mentioned your typo because you make
so many of them and look really stupid in doing so.

it's about your wanting to argue at every turn, without having a
****ing clue about the topic.


In article , nospam
wrote:
first of all, there isn't going to be a windows 19. if you want to be
taken seriously, you should proofread your posts to catch typos.

second, the discussion is about automatic updates in win 10, which
affects only to those who already have it installed. threshold fixes a
****load of bugs and deferring it would be stupid. many people consider
it to be the real windows 10 initial release.

nowhere did i say anything about liking or disliking it.

In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:

read your own statement: pray tell us what yo were talking about,
if not windows 19.
" it's possible to defer it but that would be stupid, especially
now, on
the verge of threshold being released."

you're stupider than i thought, which already was rather stupid.

Your opinion is of little consequence to me, Especially when you
misuse words.

no words were misused.

An educated person - a product of the University of Wisconsin, for
example - would use "more stupid". "Stupider" is marginally
acceptable, but a mark of a ill-educated person.

an educated person would discuss the actual topic and not argue about
word usage or hurl insults.

an educated person would find that stupider is in several dictionaries:
https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=stupider
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/stupider
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/stupider
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/stupid

that makes you the stupid one.

An educated person would recognize that "Windows 19" is an obvious
typo and not present a "stupider" argument. It is hypocrisy of the
first order to try to make a meal of a typo and then say that one
shouldn't argue about word usage. It is hypocrisy of the first order
to whine about insults when insulting someone else by calling them
"stupid".

then it's a good thing i recognized it was a typo, which means by your
standard (not that it matters), i'm educated.

You did?

yes i did.

Then why did you say "pray tell us what yo were talking
about, if not windows 19."?

peter wrote that. i did not.

In another post on this you said: "first of all, there isn't going to
be a windows 19. if you want to be taken seriously, you should
proofread your posts to catch typos."

that's what i wrote in response to what peter wrote because he makes so
many typos.

Evidently, you understand we don't take you seriously because you
don't proofread and catch typos like "yo" for "you".

evidently, you have dug yourself an even deeper hole and have outdone
peter in how stupid one person can be.

below are the relevant messages, and since you have a very difficult
time comprehending what is written, i included both peter's original
along with my response (quoting his message again).

In article , PeterN
wrote:
On 10/15/2015 11:40 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN
wrote:
A massive update of Windows 10/64 forced itself on to me first thing
this morning.

No it didn't. You had to have had some sort of auto-update enabled.

that's how windows 10 works.

it's possible to defer it but that would be stupid, especially now, on
the verge of threshold being released.

According to you, everyone who doesn't like Win10 is stupid, regardless
of their reason. .

i never said that. more of your lies.


read your own statement: pray tell us what yo were talking about, if not
windows 19.
" it's possible to defer it but that would be stupid, especially now, on
the verge of threshold being released."

......

In article , nospam
wrote:
In article , PeterN
wrote:

A massive update of Windows 10/64 forced itself on to me first thing
this morning.

No it didn't. You had to have had some sort of auto-update enabled.

that's how windows 10 works.

it's possible to defer it but that would be stupid, especially now, on
the verge of threshold being released.

According to you, everyone who doesn't like Win10 is stupid, regardless
of their reason. .

i never said that. more of your lies.

read your own statement: pray tell us what yo were talking about, if not
windows 19.
" it's possible to defer it but that would be stupid, especially now, on
the verge of threshold being released."

you're stupider than i thought, which already was rather stupid.

first of all, there isn't going to be a windows 19. if you want to be
taken seriously, you should proofread your posts to catch typos.

second, the discussion is about automatic updates in win 10, which
affects only to those who already have it installed. threshold fixes a
****load of bugs and deferring it would be stupid. many people consider
it to be the real windows 10 initial release.

nowhere did i say anything about liking or disliking it.

On 2015-10-17 10:53, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:19:03 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote:

On 2015-10-17 01:43, nospam wrote:
In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:

read your own statement: pray tell us what yo were talking about, if not
windows 19.
" it's possible to defer it but that would be stupid, especially now, on
the verge of threshold being released."

you're stupider than i thought, which already was rather stupid.

Your opinion is of little consequence to me, Especially when you misuse
words.

no words were misused.

An educated person - a product of the University of Wisconsin, for
example - would use "more stupid". "Stupider" is marginally
acceptable, but a mark of a ill-educated person.

an educated person would discuss the actual topic and not argue about
word usage or hurl insults.

an educated person would find that stupider is in several dictionaries:
https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=stupider
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/stupider
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/stupider
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/stupid

that makes you the stupid one.


While it may be in a dictionary it is an awkward spoken comparative that
sounds very stupid when spoken and looks stupid written.

That said, you're right that Tony is side tracking with such.

You have to wonder what could possibly be off-topic in this newsgroup.
What is "on-topic"? Certainly not posts about photography.

While that is true, what you pointed out was not a topic change but an
attack on style - which usenet generally lets go. Or used to. Of
course that was in retort to a mud sling, so ...


The "topic", in nospam's posts, is whatever he wants to argue about
today. The "issue" changes direction like a weather vane in a cyclone
in his posts, but it is always - in his stupider opinion - what he
wants it to be.

In any written dialog, word choice is inherently of importance.

Usenet began more as a conversation between a group of people who were
interested in solving problems and exchanging ideas. People read past
grammar and spelling errors (not to mention style) to context and meaning.

It has become a morass. More asses, that is.