A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » Medium Format Photography Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Long term damage to light meters?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 12th 06, 06:33 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Long term damage to light meters?


Some time ago, somewhere, somebody posted a claim that incident light
meters should never be left out of their case for extended periods as
ambient light would degrade their sensitivity over time.

Any basis for this?

Cheers,
Alan.
--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
  #2  
Old February 12th 06, 07:22 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Long term damage to light meters?

In article , Alan Browne
wrote:

Some time ago, somewhere, somebody posted a claim that incident light
meters should never be left out of their case for extended periods as
ambient light would degrade their sensitivity over time.

Any basis for this?


I've never heard anything ridiculous like that. Sounds like someone on
bad drugs.
  #3  
Old February 12th 06, 08:55 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Long term damage to light meters?

The cells could break down, I suppose, if left in bright light for
extended periods...


Alan Browne wrote:
Some time ago, somewhere, somebody posted a claim that incident light
meters should never be left out of their case for extended periods as
ambient light would degrade their sensitivity over time.

Any basis for this?

Cheers,
Alan.
--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.


  #4  
Old February 12th 06, 09:07 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Long term damage to light meters?

On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:22:01 -0800, Randall Ainsworth
wrote:

I've never heard anything ridiculous like that. Sounds like someone on
bad drugs.


This is probably true of selenium meters on vintage gear, but I
don't recall if the damage is directly due to sunlight or from
moisture absorbed by the crystal and then freed by heat.

--
Michael Benveniste --
Spam and UCE professionally evaluated for $419. Use this email
address only to submit mail for evaluation.

  #5  
Old February 13th 06, 12:49 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Long term damage to light meters?

I believe this is correct; selenium cell meters were always "on."

With CDS or newer type cells, this is not true.

Michael Benveniste wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:22:01 -0800, Randall Ainsworth
wrote:



I've never heard anything ridiculous like that. Sounds like someone on
bad drugs.



This is probably true of selenium meters on vintage gear, but I
don't recall if the damage is directly due to sunlight or from
moisture absorbed by the crystal and then freed by heat.



  #6  
Old February 13th 06, 06:27 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Long term damage to light meters?

Alan Browne wrote:

Some time ago, somewhere, somebody posted a claim that incident light
meters should never be left out of their case for extended periods as
ambient light would degrade their sensitivity over time.

Any basis for this?


Selenium cells do wear off in bright light. In space applications
(generating electricity for satellites) they lose 4% (IIRC) of their
capacity annually. On ground it shouldn't be that bad. But still, you
can't find old selenium meters that work correctly. Many older cameras
with selenium cells had a flip on the cell, so you could cover it when
not in use.

CdS (photoresistor) and Si (photodiode) cells shouldn't have the same
problem. They are based on different physical phenomena.

-- Lassi
  #7  
Old February 13th 06, 01:31 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Long term damage to light meters?

All right, Lassi. We Finns agree!

Lassi Hippeläinen wrote:

Alan Browne wrote:


Some time ago, somewhere, somebody posted a claim that incident light
meters should never be left out of their case for extended periods as
ambient light would degrade their sensitivity over time.

Any basis for this?



Selenium cells do wear off in bright light. In space applications
(generating electricity for satellites) they lose 4% (IIRC) of their
capacity annually. On ground it shouldn't be that bad. But still, you
can't find old selenium meters that work correctly. Many older cameras
with selenium cells had a flip on the cell, so you could cover it when
not in use.

CdS (photoresistor) and Si (photodiode) cells shouldn't have the same
problem. They are based on different physical phenomena.

-- Lassi


  #8  
Old February 15th 06, 06:17 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Long term damage to light meters?

Lassi Hippeläinen wrote:

capacity annually. On ground it shouldn't be that bad. But still, you
can't find old selenium meters that work correctly. Many older cameras



I've got a Westonmaster V which works fine.
  #9  
Old February 20th 06, 12:58 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Long term damage to light meters?



Thanks, everyone, for your replies. In summary it would appear that
this applies to the no longer common selenium meters.

I do keep my meter in its case, normally, but occasionally leave it out
in the "studio" where it might sit for a week or so before I put it away.

Cheers,
Alan.

Alan Browne wrote:


Some time ago, somewhere, somebody posted a claim that incident light
meters should never be left out of their case for extended periods as
ambient light would degrade their sensitivity over time.

Any basis for this?




--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Infinite depth of field? Rich Digital Photography 1 November 3rd 05 02:43 AM
SB800 Nikon flash question (with D70) larrylook Digital Photography 8 January 16th 05 06:28 PM
Question on Light Meters. MATT WILLIAMS Medium Format Photography Equipment 6 December 17th 04 01:16 PM
Light meters, ratio lighting Alan Browne Photographing People 5 May 6th 04 05:27 PM
How to determine distance from KEY light to subject Phil Lamerton Photographing People 12 April 27th 04 05:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.