If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon superzoom a useful piece of kit
On 13/11/2012 20:09, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:
David Taylor wrote: On 03/11/2012 00:50, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: [] There is already one. It's not doing the 18-27mm part, though --- which doesn't matter, since it's a full frame lens. Came out 2004 ... [] -Wolfgang Yes, I've handled one of those on a D800 - a very weighty beast! How did you get an 'L' version (i.e. a Canon lens) on that Nikon? -Wolfgang Eh? Canon never came into it! Nikon D800 + Nikon 27 - 300 mm lens. -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon superzoom a useful piece of kit
On 14/11/2012 7:47 PM, David Taylor wrote:
On 13/11/2012 20:09, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: David Taylor wrote: On 03/11/2012 00:50, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: [] There is already one. It's not doing the 18-27mm part, though --- which doesn't matter, since it's a full frame lens. Came out 2004 ... [] -Wolfgang Yes, I've handled one of those on a D800 - a very weighty beast! How did you get an 'L' version (i.e. a Canon lens) on that Nikon? -Wolfgang Eh? Canon never came into it! Nikon D800 + Nikon 27 - 300 mm lens. So where did you come across the 27-300 lens? |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon superzoom a useful piece of kit
On 14/11/2012 09:08, Rob wrote:
[] So where did you come across the 27-300 lens? Typo: http://www.dpreview.com/news/2010/8/19/nikon28300mm -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon superzoom a useful piece of kit
David Taylor wrote:
On 13/11/2012 20:09, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: David Taylor wrote: On 03/11/2012 00:50, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: [] There is already one. It's not doing the 18-27mm part, though --- which doesn't matter, since it's a full frame lens. Came out 2004 ... Yes, I've handled one of those on a D800 - a very weighty beast! How did you get an 'L' version (i.e. a Canon lens) on that Nikon? Eh? Canon never came into it! Nikon D800 + Nikon 27 - 300 mm lens. In the part that said: | You're thinking an "L" version? | | There is already one. It's not doing the 18-27mm part, though | --- which doesn't matter, since it's a full frame lens. Came out | 2004 ... I distinctively saw an "L". Is the "Nikon 28 - 300 mm lens" an L lens? Did it come out in 2004, too? -Wolfgang |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon superzoom a useful piece of kit
Trevor wrote:
"Doug McDonald" wrote in message On 11/13/2012 3:07 PM, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: David J. Littleboy wrote: Now all Canon needs to do is cough up a 17-40/4.0 II that's as good as the 24-70/2.8 II. Sigh. Interestingly I have a Canon 10-22/4 for their crop frame cameras and it is an exceedingly fine lens. Truly remarkably low lateral chromatic aberration. You mean the 10-22 f3.5-4.5 EFS? Pretty good for a non pro lens. But obviously not a match for the 24-70f2.8 II, or with FF camera's. Of course not. Not only does the 10-22 not have the range of 36-70mm (35mm format), it also has that completely unneeded part where it goes to 16-23mm (35mm format). Alone from that it is obvious the 24-70 is superior, as ot only misses 7mm and gains 34mm. Which means it:s 27mm better. Is that close enough to your logic, Trevor, on comparing lenses? -Wolfgang |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon superzoom a useful piece of kit
On 18/11/2012 16:42, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:
David Taylor wrote: On 13/11/2012 20:09, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: David Taylor wrote: On 03/11/2012 00:50, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: [] There is already one. It's not doing the 18-27mm part, though --- which doesn't matter, since it's a full frame lens. Came out 2004 ... Yes, I've handled one of those on a D800 - a very weighty beast! How did you get an 'L' version (i.e. a Canon lens) on that Nikon? Eh? Canon never came into it! Nikon D800 + Nikon 27 - 300 mm lens. In the part that said: | You're thinking an "L" version? | | There is already one. It's not doing the 18-27mm part, though | --- which doesn't matter, since it's a full frame lens. Came out | 2004 ... I distinctively saw an "L". Is the "Nikon 28 - 300 mm lens" an L lens? Did it come out in 2004, too? -Wolfgang To avoid further confusion, the lens which I have handled is this one: http://www.dpreview.com/news/2010/8/19/nikon28300mm which was released in 2010. Nikon don't do "L" lenses. This topic is about a Nikon wide-range zoom lens. -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nikon D3000 a piece of junk? | Ray Fischer | Digital Photography | 0 | May 22nd 10 09:19 PM |
Nikon D3000 a piece of junk? | Ray Fischer | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | May 22nd 10 09:19 PM |
FA: Nikon lenses and panasonic superzoom camera | Chris Macnamara | Digital Photography | 0 | April 15th 07 10:12 AM |
FA: Nikon lenses and panasonic superzoom camera | Chris Macnamara | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | April 15th 07 10:12 AM |
Bessa R Kit, piece by piece.... | Jeffrey Metzger | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | February 27th 05 03:36 PM |