If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji E550 not telling the truth regarding light?
My understanding is that a given fstop, at a given aperture speed, at a
given ISO, at a given ambient light level, should give a similarly exposed image regardless of camera. Correct? Well the e550 seems slow (darker) to me, by at least a couple of stops. In otherwords ISO 400, 1/60, f2.8 which should ordinarily be sufficient for indoor snapshots without flash (am I wrong here, this based on experience), but the e550 images are very dark. Irritatingly enough (though I suppose this goes with their ISO 800 mode which is only available on 3M images), the movie mode is sufficiently bright indoors, even though the still photos are not. Anyone else have this experience? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I've written about this at length. Go to dpreview fuji talk forum and search for my posts (username cscltr). These "very dark" images of the e550 are a feature, not a fault. Also, the assumption is not correct, at least in my real life experience, that two cameras at the same settings should give the same exposed image. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sabineellen wrote:
Also, the assumption is not correct, at least in my real life experience, that two cameras at the same settings should give the same exposed image. Really?!? My recollection in the film days, was that if I have two cameras with the same film, and the same Aperture and the same shutter setting, I should get the same amount of exposure. If I needed twice the exposure you double the ISO, or you go down 1 full stop (f2.8 to f.2 for instance), or you doubled the length of the exposure from 1/120th to 1/60th. Is this no longer true??? If not, why not? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Sabineellen wrote: Also, the assumption is not correct, at least in my real life experience, that two cameras at the same settings should give the same exposed image. Really?!? My recollection in the film days, was that if I have two cameras with the same film, and the same Aperture and the same shutter setting, I should get the same amount of exposure. If I needed twice the exposure you double the ISO, or you go down 1 full stop (f2.8 to f.2 for instance), or you doubled the length of the exposure from 1/120th to 1/60th. Is this no longer true??? If not, why not? Film SLRs is a different story altogether. Yes, with film SLRs you're comparing like with like. In digital compacts it just isn't so. Ideally it should be, but in my experience, and from reviews, it just isn't. Well, it is to some extent, but not if you really want to be perfectly accurate about it as you seem to prefer. Anyhow, have you been to dpreview fuji talk forum and read what I wrote there about exposure/contrast issues for the f810/e550? If you can't find it email me at sabineellen AT aol DOT com and I'll send you direct links. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Sabineellen wrote: Also, the assumption is not correct, at least in my real life experience, that two cameras at the same settings should give the same exposed image. Really?!? My recollection in the film days, was that if I have two cameras with the same film, and the same Aperture and the same shutter setting, I should get the same amount of exposure. If I needed twice the exposure you double the ISO, or you go down 1 full stop (f2.8 to f.2 for instance), or you doubled the length of the exposure from 1/120th to 1/60th. Is this no longer true??? If not, why not? Film SLRs is a different story altogether. Yes, with film SLRs you're comparing like with like. In digital compacts it just isn't so. Ideally it should be, but in my experience, and from reviews, it just isn't. Well, it is to some extent, but not if you really want to be perfectly accurate about it as you seem to prefer. Anyhow, have you been to dpreview fuji talk forum and read what I wrote there about exposure/contrast issues for the f810/e550? If you can't find it email me at sabineellen AT aol DOT com and I'll send you direct links. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Sabineellen wrote: Also, the assumption is not correct, at least in my real life experience, that two cameras at the same settings should give the same exposed image. Really?!? My recollection in the film days, was that if I have two cameras with the same film, and the same Aperture and the same shutter setting, I should get the same amount of exposure. If I needed twice the exposure you double the ISO, or you go down 1 full stop (f2.8 to f.2 for instance), or you doubled the length of the exposure from 1/120th to 1/60th. Is this no longer true??? If not, why not? Film SLRs is a different story altogether. Yes, with film SLRs you're comparing like with like. In digital compacts it just isn't so. Ideally it should be, but in my experience, and from reviews, it just isn't. Well, it is to some extent, but not if you really want to be perfectly accurate about it as you seem to prefer. Anyhow, have you been to dpreview fuji talk forum and read what I wrote there about exposure/contrast issues for the f810/e550? If you can't find it email me at sabineellen AT aol DOT com and I'll send you direct links. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
fortknight writes:
My understanding is that a given fstop, at a given aperture speed, at a given ISO, at a given ambient light level, should give a similarly exposed image regardless of camera. Correct? Well the e550 seems slow (darker) to me, by at least a couple of stops. In otherwords ISO 400, 1/60, f2.8 which should ordinarily be sufficient for indoor snapshots without flash (am I wrong here, this based on experience), but the e550 images are very dark. Don't know that camera, but "indoors" covers *many* f-stops of brightness range. I've certainly found ISO 400 inadequate for many indoor photos, and marginal even for brightly fluorescent-lit classrooms at f2.8 (I mostly had f2 or better available). A given ISO / shutter / aperture *should* produce pretty much the same brightness with any standard imaging system. -- David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com/ http://www.dd-b.net/carry/ Pics: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon EOS D10 vs. Fuji S2: Opinions? | David Sleeter | Digital Photography | 7 | July 23rd 04 12:25 AM |
What light meter for Fuji GW670 11 ? | [email protected] | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 11 | April 28th 04 08:03 PM |
How to determine distance from KEY light to subject | Phil Lamerton | Photographing People | 12 | April 27th 04 05:49 PM |