A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

[SI] Happy Anniversary Shoot-In



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old October 13th 04, 10:01 PM
Mr Jessop
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"TP" wrote in message

Tony Polson i presume.


  #22  
Old October 13th 04, 10:01 PM
Mr Jessop
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"TP" wrote in message

Tony Polson i presume.


  #23  
Old October 14th 04, 01:45 AM
Bruce Murphy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mr Jessop" writes:

i downloaded a physics experiment. It was a heavy ladle and a feather.
Both dropped to the ground at the same speed. i.e rapidly. This proved a
theory made by galileo i believe.


Being more sensible, the experiment he described was two identically
sized spheres of different materials. FOr what it's worth, unless you
have a very odd ladle, you should have seen a very large different in
the two falling times, unless you were working in a vacuum.

B
  #24  
Old October 14th 04, 06:58 PM
Mr Jessop
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bruce Murphy" wrote in message
...
"Mr Jessop" writes:

i downloaded a physics experiment. It was a heavy ladle and a feather.
Both dropped to the ground at the same speed. i.e rapidly. This proved
a
theory made by galileo i believe.


Being more sensible, the experiment he described was two identically
sized spheres of different materials. FOr what it's worth, unless you
have a very odd ladle, you should have seen a very large different in
the two falling times, unless you were working in a vacuum.


erm... like on the moon?


  #25  
Old October 14th 04, 06:58 PM
Mr Jessop
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bruce Murphy" wrote in message
...
"Mr Jessop" writes:

i downloaded a physics experiment. It was a heavy ladle and a feather.
Both dropped to the ground at the same speed. i.e rapidly. This proved
a
theory made by galileo i believe.


Being more sensible, the experiment he described was two identically
sized spheres of different materials. FOr what it's worth, unless you
have a very odd ladle, you should have seen a very large different in
the two falling times, unless you were working in a vacuum.


erm... like on the moon?


  #26  
Old October 15th 04, 01:42 AM
Bruce Murphy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mr Jessop" writes:

"Bruce Murphy" wrote in message
...
"Mr Jessop" writes:

i downloaded a physics experiment. It was a heavy ladle and a feather.
Both dropped to the ground at the same speed. i.e rapidly. This proved
a
theory made by galileo i believe.


Being more sensible, the experiment he described was two identically
sized spheres of different materials. FOr what it's worth, unless you
have a very odd ladle, you should have seen a very large different in
the two falling times, unless you were working in a vacuum.


erm... like on the moon?


Close enough, yes. Why? I very much doubt that anyone has shipped a
heavy ladle to the moon, were you perhaps referring to something else?

B
  #27  
Old October 15th 04, 01:42 AM
Bruce Murphy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mr Jessop" writes:

"Bruce Murphy" wrote in message
...
"Mr Jessop" writes:

i downloaded a physics experiment. It was a heavy ladle and a feather.
Both dropped to the ground at the same speed. i.e rapidly. This proved
a
theory made by galileo i believe.


Being more sensible, the experiment he described was two identically
sized spheres of different materials. FOr what it's worth, unless you
have a very odd ladle, you should have seen a very large different in
the two falling times, unless you were working in a vacuum.


erm... like on the moon?


Close enough, yes. Why? I very much doubt that anyone has shipped a
heavy ladle to the moon, were you perhaps referring to something else?

B
  #28  
Old October 15th 04, 08:21 AM
William Graham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bruce Murphy" wrote in message
...
"Mr Jessop" writes:

i downloaded a physics experiment. It was a heavy ladle and a feather.
Both dropped to the ground at the same speed. i.e rapidly. This proved

a
theory made by galileo i believe.


Being more sensible, the experiment he described was two identically
sized spheres of different materials. FOr what it's worth, unless you
have a very odd ladle, you should have seen a very large different in
the two falling times, unless you were working in a vacuum.

B


They did it in a vacuum, at some university back East many years ago....Only
it was to test psychokinetics, or some such thing, and not Galileo....They
wanted to see if mental power could make a feather (I think they used card
chips) miss the mark when it fell three stories while students tried to
force it off track by mental power alone. In thousands of trials, no one,
nor any group of people could make it miss the mark In every case, the card
chip, in a vacuum, fell with the acceleration of gravity the three stories
and hit its target, which was a tiny hole through which it went, only to be
returned three stories up to the starting point again.....As I remember,
they did this at Duke University.......


  #29  
Old October 15th 04, 08:21 AM
William Graham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bruce Murphy" wrote in message
...
"Mr Jessop" writes:

i downloaded a physics experiment. It was a heavy ladle and a feather.
Both dropped to the ground at the same speed. i.e rapidly. This proved

a
theory made by galileo i believe.


Being more sensible, the experiment he described was two identically
sized spheres of different materials. FOr what it's worth, unless you
have a very odd ladle, you should have seen a very large different in
the two falling times, unless you were working in a vacuum.

B


They did it in a vacuum, at some university back East many years ago....Only
it was to test psychokinetics, or some such thing, and not Galileo....They
wanted to see if mental power could make a feather (I think they used card
chips) miss the mark when it fell three stories while students tried to
force it off track by mental power alone. In thousands of trials, no one,
nor any group of people could make it miss the mark In every case, the card
chip, in a vacuum, fell with the acceleration of gravity the three stories
and hit its target, which was a tiny hole through which it went, only to be
returned three stories up to the starting point again.....As I remember,
they did this at Duke University.......


  #30  
Old October 15th 04, 08:23 AM
William Graham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bruce Murphy" wrote in message
...
Close enough, yes. Why? I very much doubt that anyone has shipped a
heavy ladle to the moon, were you perhaps referring to something else?

B


Didn't they ship one up there so Neil Armstrong could sip his heavy soup?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SI] Happy Birthday Shoot-In! Al Denelsbeck 35mm Photo Equipment 4 September 25th 04 11:30 PM
Spearmint Rhino Sheffield Group Shoot ANDY Photographing People 0 August 5th 04 09:14 PM
Recommendations for Nikon Point and Shoot? Andrew McCall 35mm Photo Equipment 7 July 1st 04 09:05 PM
For Sell --- SLR camera and a Point & Shoot APS Camera: Toronto slrcamera Other Photographic Equipment 0 March 31st 04 08:10 PM
upcoming studio shoot question photo Medium Format Photography Equipment 7 February 19th 04 09:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.