If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter photos
In article , Mayayana
wrote: | Except that the colors are made-up, | | all colours are made up, Here's an actual photo: https://d2xkkdgjnsfvb0.cloudfront.ne...Interlaced=1&M ode=D&ResX=600&ResY=600&OutputFormat=jpg&Quality=8 0&t=1508962497 Here's my cleaned up version: http://tropic-island.net/gallery/img.php?id_img=196 So I guess you're right. My choice of wavelengths look better than Nasa's undoctored images. is that your home planet? I look forward to the Ladies of Neptune series. i'm sure you do. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter photos
In article , Davoud
wrote: David B. http://www.sci... Fascinating images. Enjoy! :-) I didn't enjoy them at all on that web page cluttered with slimy ads. install an ad blocker. I enjoyed them here https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/images/index.html. a much better choice. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter photos
"nospam" wrote
| http://tropic-island.net/gallery/img.php?id_img=196 | | So I guess you're right. My choice of wavelengths look | better than Nasa's undoctored images. | | is that your home planet? Maybe when my ship comes in. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter photos
In article , Mayayana
wrote: | http://tropic-island.net/gallery/img.php?id_img=196 | | So I guess you're right. My choice of wavelengths look | better than Nasa's undoctored images. | | is that your home planet? Maybe when my ship comes in. what can we do so that it arrives sooner to take you back home? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter photos
In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote: On Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:32:57 UTC, Davoud wrote: David B. http://www.sci-techuniverse.com/2017...piter-probe-ju st-s ent.html Fascinating images. Enjoy! :-) I didn't enjoy them at all on that web page cluttered with slimy ads. I enjoyed them here https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/images/index.html. yes that site (sci-techuniverse) was rather disturbing and made viewing annoying. -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm Hmmm... I do hope that the rest of the pics ain't as fake as this one... https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/f..._feature/publi c/thumbnails/image/pia21774.jpg -- teleportation kills |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter photos
"Whisky-dave" wrote
| It;s not willy nilly when they have the information that tells you what the colours mean. It's like staining cells in biology at school there's a reason for doing it and it's not for artistic perception of reality. | Take a look he https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/junocam/processing They invite you to download photos and upload your own version. Some are more subtle. Some are wild. Where do you draw the line? It's a scientific photo if it's tastefully done and it's an art project if it looks like a Peter Max poster? Both are made up. It's basically a 6th-grade art project. Staining a slide is done to increase the visibility of structures. In that scenario the color itself is not relevant and one knows that it's not accurate. Colorizing NASA photos is done to make them look more interesting aesthetically and spark the imagination. Entertaining space fantasies might help to increase public support of NASA. "Junocam is on the spacecraft explicitly to reach out to the public and share the excitement of space exploration." https://link.springer.com/article/10...214-014-0079-x NASA are trying to increase interest by making it all look more intriguing. As someone interested in science I find that misleading and devaluing. I can see how many people might think it's simply fun, like an artist's rendering of how they imagine trceratops might have been adorned with war paint-like stripes. But they should make it clear that these are doctored photos with made-up colors. That's all I'm saying. Separate the science from the entertainment. It's not as though we need an artist's rendering. The whole point is that they have actual photos of the planet. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter photos
On 10/11/2017 03:09, Rich A wrote:
On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 4:23:36 AM UTC-5, David B. wrote: "Traveling above Jupiter at more than 130,000 miles per hour, NASA's $1 billion Juno probe took its ninth set of stunning flyby images on October 24. But the sun slipped between the giant planet and Earth for more than a week, blocking the spacecraft from beaming home its precious bounty of data. Now that the conjunction is over, however, new raw image data from Juno's ninth perijove — as the spacecraft's high-speed flybys are called — has poured in. Researchers posted it all online on Tuesday, and a community of amateurs and professionals has been busily processing the data to yield colorful and stunning new pictures of Jupiter." http://www.sci-techuniverse.com/2017...just-sent.html Fascinating images. Enjoy! :-) -- David B. Why have we seen no real close-ups? Any image where you can clearly see the planet is round is from a distance. Have they had no probes crash but take a few images on the way down? This link posted earlier in this thread by Davoud shows MUCH better images:- https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/images/index.html I suspect, though, that without me raising the matter with my initial post, he wouldn't have offered the readers here HIS link! ;-) -- David B. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter photos
On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 02:22:58 -0800 (PST), Whisky-dave
wrote: On Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:31:31 UTC, Eric Stevens wrote: On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 07:58:15 -0800 (PST), Whisky-dave wrote: On Thursday, 9 November 2017 14:20:16 UTC, Mayayana wrote: "David B." wrote | http://www.sci-techuniverse.com/2017...just-sent.html | | Fascinating images. Except that the colors are made-up, all colours are made up, it;s what our eye does, colours don;t really exist. But I do no what you mean the colours are used to sperate things that are going on making them easier to see. A bit less crude than a highlight pen :-) so what you're really seeing is sci-fi fantasy. Not really it's being able to see more wavelenghs or more information than the human eye could actually see. Itls a bit likke claiming that bats don;t fly at night because you can;t see them in the dark, in ordee to see how they fly yuo could use infra-red light with an infra-red sensative camera, you'd see bats flying but not their correct colour. It;s a bit like teh link below we can;t see carbon dioxide in the air but colouring it makes it easier to see and understand, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-41604760 So as long as you appreciate this there shouldn't be a problem. Except that is not any sort of a photographic image. Its a computer generated diagram based on observational data. No one said it was a photographic image, perhaps you assumed it was because you viewed it using your eyes. We were discussing photographic images and then, suddenly, without warning you popped up a computer generated diagram. On the bright side, NASA images are public domain by law. -- Regards, Eric Stevens -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter photos
rOn Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:17:38 +0100, android wrote:
In article , Whisky-dave wrote: On Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:32:57 UTC, Davoud wrote: David B. http://www.sci-techuniverse.com/2017...piter-probe-ju st-s ent.html Fascinating images. Enjoy! :-) I didn't enjoy them at all on that web page cluttered with slimy ads. I enjoyed them here https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/images/index.html. yes that site (sci-techuniverse) was rather disturbing and made viewing annoying. -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm Hmmm... I do hope that the rest of the pics ain't as fake as this one... https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/pia21774.jpg I don't know about 'fake' so much as a good way to show the scale of the Great Red Spot. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter photos
In article ,
Eric Stevens wrote: rOn Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:17:38 +0100, android wrote: In article , Whisky-dave wrote: On Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:32:57 UTC, Davoud wrote: David B. http://www.sci-techuniverse.com/2017...-jupiter-probe -ju st-s ent.html Fascinating images. Enjoy! :-) I didn't enjoy them at all on that web page cluttered with slimy ads. I enjoyed them here https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/images/index.html. yes that site (sci-techuniverse) was rather disturbing and made viewing annoying. -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm Hmmm... I do hope that the rest of the pics ain't as fake as this one... https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/f...ture/public/th umbnails/image/pia21774.jpg I don't know about 'fake' so much as a good way to show the scale of the Great Red Spot. It's FAKE science it tell ya! FAAKE!!!!! -- teleportation kills |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Io Transit of Jupiter through a Fieldscope | M-M | Digital Photography | 3 | September 18th 10 03:03 PM |
Jupiter | Troy Piggins[_31_] | Digital Photography | 49 | November 2nd 09 08:31 AM |
WTB: Zorki 3m with Jupiter 8 | John Doe | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | March 28th 05 03:24 AM |
Got my Jupiter 21m 200mm f/4 lens | adm | Digital Photography | 1 | January 20th 05 04:48 AM |
Got my Jupiter 21m 200mm f/4 lens | Siddhartha Jain | Digital SLR Cameras | 2 | January 20th 05 04:48 AM |