If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is this true about Canon?
On Jan 31, 11:59 pm, M-M wrote:
Someone else wrote the following and I'm wondering if it is true: "Canon for some time has been the faster better sports equipment. Not all just in auto focus but also frames per second and write speed to the buffer is also faster. Read the features and compare. There are also many more lenses in the Canon system. Nikon only does as well as it does because so many photographers had a large number of Nikon lenses as the photo world began to change. Canon now has over 80% on the professional market because of chip size and all the great features. If you ever use a Canon Camera for just a short while you will see what I am talking about and you would never look back. Nothing wrong with Nikon of Fuji they are just that other 20% for the most part, and that does not make them bad. All of the cameras today make great photographs as long as you set them the right way. As for Canons auto focus system everything else is second." "Read about their ring ultrasonic motor for rapid autofocus. Hold a Nikon in your hands and then a Canon--and compare the rapidity of autofocus with a long lens (a Canon white lens)--even to Nikon's own version of the ring ultrasonic motor." -- m-m As everyone has said no camera does everything the best, there are always compromises. Right now Nikon's metering, and flash systems are supposedly better than Canons. Argueably Canon's long lenses focus faster. What Canon does is treat pros better. If you are on their "Pro list" you can get free loaners of those white lenses to cover events. Canon cover a lot of events this way, shot a "First Night" for a town paper, at most of the events a photographer working for a national news agency was there. Said his own cameras stay home, He 2 D1mII bodies witha 24-70 and a 70-200 IS lenses. We shot a dance troup, he showed me his images, I had Tri-X and knew everything I shot was going to be very grainy. He said he was just going to pack all the camera and lenses in a box and ship them FedX back to Canon in the morning. Nikon has a similar program but make it much more difficult for the photographers to get equipment and services. Tom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this true about Canon? | Bill | Digital Photography | 44 | February 11th 07 09:46 AM |
Is this true about Canon? | Annika1980 | Digital Photography | 6 | February 2nd 07 10:20 PM |
Is this true about Canon? | Roy G | Digital Photography | 0 | February 1st 07 09:36 AM |
Is this true about Canon? | C J Campbell | Digital Photography | 0 | February 1st 07 06:57 AM |
Is this true about Canon? | Floyd L. Davidson | Digital Photography | 0 | February 1st 07 06:51 AM |