If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|GG| Punography comments from Annika1980
Annika1980 wrote:
Awful OK... here's two I didn't submit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/3524153887/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|GG| Punography comments from Annika1980
* Paul Furman wrote :
Annika1980 wrote: Awful OK... here's two I didn't submit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/3524153887/ I get the title, but it's not really a pun. Is it? It's more literal of a saying. -- Troy Piggins |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|GG| Punography comments from Annika1980
Troy Piggins wrote:
* Paul Furman wrote : Annika1980 wrote: Awful OK... here's two I didn't submit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/3524153887/ I get the title, but it's not really a pun. Is it? It's more literal of a saying. I figured that was within the scope but it should've been at least somewhat clever and an interesting picture which that wasn't really. The one just after that is a sedum plant seated on a chair. Get it? Seat-um... ugh... -- Paul Furman www.edgehill.net www.baynatives.com all google groups messages filtered due to spam |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|GG| Punography comments from Annika1980
Troy Piggins wrote:
* Paul Furman wrote : Annika1980 wrote: Awful OK... here's two I didn't submit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/3524153887/ I get the title, but it's not really a pun. Is it? It's more literal of a saying. Yes but I figured that'S close enough. Then again, I didn't submit it :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|GG| Punography comments from Annika1980
"Helen" wrote in message
... On May 12, 9:44 am, Annika1980 wrote: Here is my non-submission: http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/112438204/original The green is cartoonish from far too much saturation. I've seen a lot better from you. I disagree. The grass is very green and oversaturated but if that's the effect the artist intended and if it does what the artist intended it to do then there's nothing wrong with that at all. Given the title I'd say it's fair to assume the effect is intended - it's certainly appropriate. I really like that shot and I simply can't understand why Annika1980 chose not to submit it. The line of the fence and the reach of the horse look good and I like the mass of detail. It draws my eye in nicely and hold my attention. Not a "wow" photo sure but certainly not one to be damned for. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|GG| Punography comments from Annika1980
I really like that shot and I simply can't understand why Annika1980 chose not to submit it. The line of the fence It was obviously stitched........ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|GG| Punography comments from Annika1980
"Helen" wrote in message ... On May 12, 9:44 am, Annika1980 wrote: Here is my non-submission: http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/112438204/original The green is cartoonish from far too much saturation. I've seen a lot better from you. Oh. My. God. Dissed by Helen. Atta girl, Helen! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|GG| Punography comments from Annika1980
"Annika1980" wrote in message ... On May 13, 3:41 pm, "Pete D" wrote: I really like that shot and I simply can't understand why Annika1980 chose not to submit it. The line of the fence It was obviously stitched........ LOL! Hey, someone had to say it.... ;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Punography comments from Calvin Sambrook | Calvin Sambrook | 35mm Photo Equipment | 15 | May 14th 09 06:26 AM |
Punography comments from Annika1980 | Troy Piggins[_26_] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 7 | May 13th 09 07:01 PM |
|GG| Punography comments from Annika1980 | Paul Furman | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | May 12th 09 07:50 AM |