If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
2018 Comparison of Nvidia GPU on LR and PS tasks
https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/ar...formance-1139/
"GPU acceleration has become fairly common in Adobe applications, but only a few select tasks in Photoshop are able to take advantage of the video card to improve performance. In fact, some features (like 3D, Render Flame, and Oil Paint) require that you have a compatible GPU while others (Image Size, Blur Gallery, Smart Sharpen, etc.) are simply able to utilize a GPU to improve performance. It has only been about a year since we last looked at GPU performance in Photoshop, but a number of developments have occurred that made us what to re-do this testing. First, our old testing didn't include the GTX 1080 Ti, Titan Xp, or Titan V and we are curious if these newer cards can give us any performance gains. Second, we have just published our internally developed Photoshop CC 2018 benchmark and made it available for public download. Because of this, we wanted to have a set of scores (specifically the "GPU Score") available for anyone who wants to see how their existing PC or Mac stacks up against these GPUs." -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
2018 Comparison of Nvidia GPU on LR and PS tasks
On 13/11/2018 03:12, Eric Stevens wrote:
https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/ar...formance-1139/ "GPU acceleration has become fairly common in Adobe applications, but only a few select tasks in Photoshop are able to take advantage of the video card to improve performance. In fact, some features (like 3D, Render Flame, and Oil Paint) require that you have a compatible GPU while others (Image Size, Blur Gallery, Smart Sharpen, etc.) are simply able to utilize a GPU to improve performance. Interesting, thanks. A wider range of low-mid range cards would have been useful. I think I'm right in saying the AMD Radeon R9 M290X (about equivalent to a 1050?) in my iMac would be pretty much equal to even the highest end card in all but image resize. -- Cheers, Rob |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
2018 Comparison of Nvidia GPU on LR and PS tasks
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 05:34:50 +0000, RJH wrote:
On 13/11/2018 03:12, Eric Stevens wrote: https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/ar...formance-1139/ "GPU acceleration has become fairly common in Adobe applications, but only a few select tasks in Photoshop are able to take advantage of the video card to improve performance. In fact, some features (like 3D, Render Flame, and Oil Paint) require that you have a compatible GPU while others (Image Size, Blur Gallery, Smart Sharpen, etc.) are simply able to utilize a GPU to improve performance. Interesting, thanks. A wider range of low-mid range cards would have been useful. I think I'm right in saying the AMD Radeon R9 M290X (about equivalent to a 1050?) in my iMac would be pretty much equal to even the highest end card in all but image resize. Well, they were testing Nvidia. You should also note that the paragraph you snipped contains a link to their benchmark software which, as they say, is "available for anyone who wants to see how their existing PC or Mac stacks up against these GPUs". I have marked the position of the link with * *. You should try it and report back. "It has only been about a year since we last looked at GPU performance in Photoshop, but a number of developments have occurred that made us what to re-do this testing. First, our old testing didn't include the GTX 1080 Ti, Titan Xp, or Titan V and we are curious if these newer cards can give us any performance gains. Second, we have just published our internally developed Photoshop CC 2018 benchmark and made*it available for public download.* Because of this, we wanted to have a set of scores (specifically the "GPU Score") available for anyone who wants to see how their existing PC or Mac stacks up against these GPUs." -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
2018 Comparison of Nvidia GPU on LR and PS tasks
On 13/11/2018 08:58, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 05:34:50 +0000, RJH wrote: On 13/11/2018 03:12, Eric Stevens wrote: https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/ar...formance-1139/ "GPU acceleration has become fairly common in Adobe applications, but only a few select tasks in Photoshop are able to take advantage of the video card to improve performance. In fact, some features (like 3D, Render Flame, and Oil Paint) require that you have a compatible GPU while others (Image Size, Blur Gallery, Smart Sharpen, etc.) are simply able to utilize a GPU to improve performance. Interesting, thanks. A wider range of low-mid range cards would have been useful. I think I'm right in saying the AMD Radeon R9 M290X (about equivalent to a 1050?) in my iMac would be pretty much equal to even the highest end card in all but image resize. Well, they were testing Nvidia. You should also note that the paragraph you snipped contains a link to their benchmark software which, as they say, is "available for anyone who wants to see how their existing PC or Mac stacks up against these GPUs". I have marked the position of the link with * *. You should try it and report back. Yes, thanks, but I don't have Photoshop - mine was more a 'what if' sort of musing . . . -- Cheers, Rob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nvidia content aware fill looks impressive | Alfred Molon[_4_] | Digital Photography | 1 | April 26th 18 04:32 AM |
Who is Who and What is What in Photography 2018 | android | Digital Photography | 0 | January 25th 18 07:02 AM |
2018: Bevare of Them Beast! | android | Digital Photography | 1 | January 2nd 18 04:20 PM |
On1 Photo RAW 2018 Final Release | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 37 | November 18th 17 12:46 PM |