A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » Large Format Photography Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

PMK vs HD



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 18th 04, 02:25 PM
CamArtsMag
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default PMK vs HD

I have run to tests with these developers. One using 35mm FP4+ and one using
4x5 Tri-X and FP4+. The first article was in the June/July 04 CameraArts and th
second will be in the July/Aug 04 View Camera. The result seem consistent in
both tests

PMK creates more stain,more elevated high values, a slightly sharper print and
just a little more grain. I also seem to get a little more film speed from PMK.

One alwys has to calibrate their film and fim developer to te paper they are
using. This is true with a staining developer and a non-staining developer. The
comments about PMK not working with variable cntrst paper ae innaccurate. If
you ar not getting enough contrast with a stainng developer then increase your
developing time just as you would with a non-staining developer.

steve simmons
  #2  
Old June 19th 04, 11:11 PM
Richard Knoppow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default PMK vs HD


"CamArtsMag" wrote in message
...
I have run to tests with these developers. One using 35mm

FP4+ and one using
4x5 Tri-X and FP4+. The first article was in the June/July

04 CameraArts and th
second will be in the July/Aug 04 View Camera. The result

seem consistent in
both tests

PMK creates more stain,more elevated high values, a

slightly sharper print and
just a little more grain. I also seem to get a little more

film speed from PMK.

One alwys has to calibrate their film and fim developer to

te paper they are
using. This is true with a staining developer and a

non-staining developer. The
comments about PMK not working with variable cntrst paper

ae innaccurate. If
you ar not getting enough contrast with a stainng

developer then increase your
developing time just as you would with a non-staining

developer.

steve simmons


It would be interesting and maybe useful to compare a Pyro
staining developer like PMK or even old ABC Pyro against a
standard non-staining developer, say D-76 or some more
modern type like Xtol and compare the resulting prints.
Prining quality should be tested on both graded and VC
paper. Its a lot of work plus its hard to determine the
_effective_ density of Pyro negatives because of the
spectral transmission of the stain. The densitometer filter
must be reasonably close to the spectral sensitivity of the
paper to make the readings valid.
Staining developers can be looked at as a combination of
a developer and an intensifier.

--
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA



  #3  
Old June 20th 04, 01:19 AM
Gregory W Blank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default PMK vs HD

In article .net,
"Richard Knoppow" wrote:

It would be interesting and maybe useful to compare a Pyro
staining developer like PMK or even old ABC Pyro against a
standard non-staining developer, say D-76 or some more
modern type like Xtol and compare the resulting prints.
Prining quality should be tested on both graded and VC
paper. Its a lot of work plus its hard to determine the
_effective_ density of Pyro negatives because of the
spectral transmission of the stain. The densitometer filter
must be reasonably close to the spectral sensitivity of the
paper to make the readings valid.
Staining developers can be looked at as a combination of
a developer and an intensifier.


I find the Spot probe which is designed to read Color of my
Colorstar 3000 to be very effective at reading both stain and Density
of PMK/Pyro Negatives.
--
LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.