If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D70s, NEF, and Macintosh
I recently purchased a Nikon D70s and a 1-gig Lexar Compact Flash card.
iPhoto says it can't recgnize the NEF formatted files; I tried connecting the camera directly to the computer (with a USB cable), and reading the card with a card reader. A friend who has a D70 has no problem importing NEF files from her camera with iPhoto. I can import them with PictureProject and with GraphicConverter, though. I don't have any version of Photoshop. Are there differences between the D70 version of NEF and the D70s version? If not, why can't I import with iPhoto? Second question: Does Photoshop SE offer enough advantages over GraphicConverter to make it worth the money? Third question: Is Nikon View or Nikon Capture worth buying? Thanks in advance. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon User wrote:
Are there differences between the D70 version of NEF and the D70s version? Yes. You will probably have to wait for iPhoto to be updated for it to recognize the NEFs. Second question: Does Photoshop SE offer enough advantages over GraphicConverter to make it worth the money? I'm not sure what "Photoshop SE" is, but if you meant "CS2", then, yes. Third question: Is Nikon View or Nikon Capture worth buying? No. Not worth using even if free. -- Jeremy | |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Jim" wrote: Third question: Is Nikon View or Nikon Capture worth buying? If you own the 10.5mm fisheye, then you can convert the image from round to rectangular. The rectangular image still needs some work to avoid the falling over backwards look. Otherwise, both are a waste of money and time. *chuckle* No, I don't own the fisheye. Thanks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Jeremy Nixon wrote: Are there differences between the D70 version of NEF and the D70s version? Yes. You will probably have to wait for iPhoto to be updated for it to recognize the NEFs. Thanks. Second question: Does Photoshop SE offer enough advantages over GraphicConverter to make it worth the money? I'm not sure what "Photoshop SE" is, but if you meant "CS2", then, yes. Actually, I meant Photoshop Elements. I don't know where I got the "SE" from. Photoshop CS2 is much more than I need, and costs much more than I can justify spending. So, the question is the comparison between Photoshop Elements and GraphicConverter. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Nikon User" wrote in message news:jNT1f.12071$fE5.10027@fed1read06... I recently purchased a Nikon D70s and a 1-gig Lexar Compact Flash card. iPhoto says it can't recgnize the NEF formatted files; I tried connecting the camera directly to the computer (with a USB cable), and reading the card with a card reader. A friend who has a D70 has no problem importing NEF files from her camera with iPhoto. I can import them with PictureProject and with GraphicConverter, though. I don't have any version of Photoshop. Are there differences between the D70 version of NEF and the D70s version? If not, why can't I import with iPhoto? Second question: Does Photoshop SE offer enough advantages over GraphicConverter to make it worth the money? Third question: Is Nikon View or Nikon Capture worth buying? If you own the 10.5mm fisheye, then you can convert the image from round to rectangular. The rectangular image still needs some work to avoid the falling over backwards look. Otherwise, both are a waste of money and time. Jim Thanks in advance. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Ed Ruf wrote: Third question: Is Nikon View or Nikon Capture worth buying If you own the 10.5mm fisheye, then you can convert the image from round to rectangular. The rectangular image still needs some work to avoid the falling over backwards look. Otherwise, both are a waste of money and time. Even if you assign value of zero to NV, since it's free, the amount of value per price is still indeterminate. NV is a free download on the Nikon Support web site. Apparently, it does not support the D70s; when I list my camera as a D70s it does not show up in the downloads list, but if I list it as a D70, it does show up. So I can scratch it from consideration, regardless. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon User wrote:
I'm not sure what "Photoshop SE" is, but if you meant "CS2", then, yes. Actually, I meant Photoshop Elements. I don't know where I got the "SE" from. Photoshop CS2 is much more than I need, and costs much more than I can justify spending. So, the question is the comparison between Photoshop Elements and GraphicConverter. Then I'd say "maybe". Elements is lacking some things that I find rather fundamental to photo post-processing, like Curves, and I consider it not really suitable for serious photography. The price tag on the full CS2 is a bit of a bummer, yes. -- Jeremy | |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Jeremy Nixon wrote: So, the question is the comparison between Photoshop Elements and GraphicConverter. Then I'd say "maybe". Elements is lacking some things that I find rather fundamental to photo post-processing, like Curves, and I consider it not really suitable for serious photography. Thanks. Frankly, I don't know what Curves is (in relation to digital photography), so I probably don't need it--at least not for a while. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Jim" wrote: Even if you assign value of zero to NV, since it's free, the amount of value per price is still indeterminate. NV is a free download on the Nikon Support web site. Apparently, it does not support the D70s; when I list my camera as a D70s it does not show up in the downloads list, but if I list it as a D70, it does show up. So I can scratch it from consideration, regardless. Picture Project came with my D70. All it does for me is download the files and format the card. It came with my D70s too; however, we're talking about Nikon View here. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon User wrote:
Thanks. Frankly, I don't know what Curves is (in relation to digital photography), so I probably don't need it--at least not for a while. That's a fair statement -- and part of the reason I said Elements was a "maybe" even though I followed it up with a "not suitable". What's important is whether it does what *you* want, not whether it does what I want. It's a good program. If the feature list matches your needs, I'd say go for it. If you outgrow it, you'll know. However, it is worth noting that the new version just came out for Windows but not for Mac, with the Mac version "still in development", whatever that might mean. Anyway, there is a demo available, so you can download that and see if you like it. -- Jeremy | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|