If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why are low dpi printers more expensive?
wrote in message
... I'm looking to buy a new photo printer for my Canon 10d digital camera. I want an Epson printer because the carts are cheap and the printers last a long time. Just one thing, I've seen DPI on the new and old printers and I can't understand why the low dpi printers cost more momey. For example, Epson Stylus Photo 2100 is 2880 DPI on A3 paper and costs around £422. The Epson Stylus Photo R800 is 5760 DPI on A4 paper and costs £240. There are other printers aswell which are like this, low DPI more money, high DPI less money. From what I understand, "The resolution is stated in pixels (points) per inch. The higher resolution the finer printouts." Why is the higher DPI printer/s cheaper than the semi professional Photo printers? I really can't understand. I know photo paper can only handle so many DPI before it starts to overlap but why are the low DPI A3 printers so much more money? I don't think A3 printers can print more DPI on A4 paper. Epson 2100 is a wide-format printer, R800 prints up to A4/8.5" x 11". Look at the size of the printer first. Mark |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why are low dpi printers more expensive?
wrote in message
... I'm looking to buy a new photo printer for my Canon 10d digital camera. I want an Epson printer because the carts are cheap and the printers last a long time. Just one thing, I've seen DPI on the new and old printers and I can't understand why the low dpi printers cost more momey. For example, Epson Stylus Photo 2100 is 2880 DPI on A3 paper and costs around £422. The Epson Stylus Photo R800 is 5760 DPI on A4 paper and costs £240. There are other printers aswell which are like this, low DPI more money, high DPI less money. From what I understand, "The resolution is stated in pixels (points) per inch. The higher resolution the finer printouts." Why is the higher DPI printer/s cheaper than the semi professional Photo printers? I really can't understand. I know photo paper can only handle so many DPI before it starts to overlap but why are the low DPI A3 printers so much more money? I don't think A3 printers can print more DPI on A4 paper. Epson 2100 is a wide-format printer, R800 prints up to A4/8.5" x 11". Look at the size of the printer first. Mark |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why are low dpi printers more expensive?
wrote in message ... On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 19:29:11 -0400, "Mark B." wrote: Epson 2100 is a wide-format printer, R800 prints up to A4/8.5" x 11". Look at the size of the printer first. At the moment, I envisage to print on A4. Until I start printing and using the printer, I don't know if I'll be using A3 or not. Is it good having an A3 printer if the DPI on A4 prints is less?? I've just looked at the RX 600 which looks good aswell as an All in one. Is it worth spending the money on A3 which has lower DPI if I've got spare cash ? I don't know why I referenced A4 in my reply; I just realized I don't know what size that actually is. 2100 can do up to 13" wide, R800 up to 8.5" wide. Personally, I wouldn't worry about the dpi difference. From what I've seen with 1440 dpi on my 870, I can't imagine 2880 will be a noticeable difference. Get the printer for the size prints you'll be doing. If you need to do larger prints, then it's worth the money. Keep in mind the 2100 has been replaced by the 2200 which can do 2880 in one direction (1440 in the other). Check epson.com for specs on all their printers. Mark |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why are low dpi printers more expensive?
wrote in message ... On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 19:29:11 -0400, "Mark B." wrote: Epson 2100 is a wide-format printer, R800 prints up to A4/8.5" x 11". Look at the size of the printer first. At the moment, I envisage to print on A4. Until I start printing and using the printer, I don't know if I'll be using A3 or not. Is it good having an A3 printer if the DPI on A4 prints is less?? I've just looked at the RX 600 which looks good aswell as an All in one. Is it worth spending the money on A3 which has lower DPI if I've got spare cash ? I don't know why I referenced A4 in my reply; I just realized I don't know what size that actually is. 2100 can do up to 13" wide, R800 up to 8.5" wide. Personally, I wouldn't worry about the dpi difference. From what I've seen with 1440 dpi on my 870, I can't imagine 2880 will be a noticeable difference. Get the printer for the size prints you'll be doing. If you need to do larger prints, then it's worth the money. Keep in mind the 2100 has been replaced by the 2200 which can do 2880 in one direction (1440 in the other). Check epson.com for specs on all their printers. Mark |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 19:29:11 -0400, "Mark B." wrote: Epson 2100 is a wide-format printer, R800 prints up to A4/8.5" x 11". Look at the size of the printer first. At the moment, I envisage to print on A4. Until I start printing and using the printer, I don't know if I'll be using A3 or not. Is it good having an A3 printer if the DPI on A4 prints is less?? I've just looked at the RX 600 which looks good aswell as an All in one. Is it worth spending the money on A3 which has lower DPI if I've got spare cash ? I don't know why I referenced A4 in my reply; I just realized I don't know what size that actually is. 2100 can do up to 13" wide, R800 up to 8.5" wide. Personally, I wouldn't worry about the dpi difference. From what I've seen with 1440 dpi on my 870, I can't imagine 2880 will be a noticeable difference. Get the printer for the size prints you'll be doing. If you need to do larger prints, then it's worth the money. Keep in mind the 2100 has been replaced by the 2200 which can do 2880 in one direction (1440 in the other). Check epson.com for specs on all their printers. Mark |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why are low dpi printers more expensive?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why are low dpi printers more expensive?
Mark B. wrote:
snip printer discussion I don't know why I referenced A4 in my reply; I just realized I don't know what size that actually is. A4 is 210mm by 297mm (8.27" by 11.69") in size. A3 is twice the width at 420mm by 279mm (16.54" by 11.69"). |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Why are low dpi printers more expensive?
There is a great deal of difference to a photographer in 1440 and 2880! Also
the 2100 IS the same printer as the 2200.The 2100 is the Euro version! The 2100(2200) and the R800 use "pigment inks"! The RX 600 does not! Pigment inks have solids suspended in them,and give much loner lasting prints,on the right papers!By the way Mark,the 2000 was the printer replaced bu the 2200! I agree people should check Epsons website for specs instead of "speculating" on the differences! "Mark B." wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 19:29:11 -0400, "Mark B." wrote: Epson 2100 is a wide-format printer, R800 prints up to A4/8.5" x 11". Look at the size of the printer first. At the moment, I envisage to print on A4. Until I start printing and using the printer, I don't know if I'll be using A3 or not. Is it good having an A3 printer if the DPI on A4 prints is less?? I've just looked at the RX 600 which looks good aswell as an All in one. Is it worth spending the money on A3 which has lower DPI if I've got spare cash ? I don't know why I referenced A4 in my reply; I just realized I don't know what size that actually is. 2100 can do up to 13" wide, R800 up to 8.5" wide. Personally, I wouldn't worry about the dpi difference. From what I've seen with 1440 dpi on my 870, I can't imagine 2880 will be a noticeable difference. Get the printer for the size prints you'll be doing. If you need to do larger prints, then it's worth the money. Keep in mind the 2100 has been replaced by the 2200 which can do 2880 in one direction (1440 in the other). Check epson.com for specs on all their printers. Mark |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Why are low dpi printers more expensive?
Past 1440 there is really no appreciable gain in the reviews that I have
read. You might see a very, very slight increase in smoothness in monochome prints with 2880. Don't take maximum DPI too seriously, some very high dpi printers (notably Lexmarks IME) turn out prints that look like trash... Toby "Mark B." wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 19:29:11 -0400, "Mark B." wrote: Epson 2100 is a wide-format printer, R800 prints up to A4/8.5" x 11". Look at the size of the printer first. At the moment, I envisage to print on A4. Until I start printing and using the printer, I don't know if I'll be using A3 or not. Is it good having an A3 printer if the DPI on A4 prints is less?? I've just looked at the RX 600 which looks good aswell as an All in one. Is it worth spending the money on A3 which has lower DPI if I've got spare cash ? I don't know why I referenced A4 in my reply; I just realized I don't know what size that actually is. 2100 can do up to 13" wide, R800 up to 8.5" wide. Personally, I wouldn't worry about the dpi difference. From what I've seen with 1440 dpi on my 870, I can't imagine 2880 will be a noticeable difference. Get the printer for the size prints you'll be doing. If you need to do larger prints, then it's worth the money. Keep in mind the 2100 has been replaced by the 2200 which can do 2880 in one direction (1440 in the other). Check epson.com for specs on all their printers. Mark |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Why are low dpi printers more expensive?
In article , Douglas
writes There is a great deal of difference to a photographer in 1440 and 2880! Not if they know what they are talking about! Here we are talking about *DOTS* per inch, not *pixels* per inch, or ppi. All of the Epson desktop range resample all of the images you send them to 720ppi (other manufacturers do the same but with differing native resolutions, like 300ppi etc.). The dots per inch is always higher than this for an inkjet printer so that each pixel's colour can be reproduced as accurately as possible by dithering the ink dot placement. More ink colours means that less dots are required per pixel to accurately produce its colour. In addition, since the highest resolution that you can see on the printed page without use of magnification is about 250ppi, and for most people it is a lot less, that 720ppi resampled data means that there are about 9 actual pixels on the page for each resolved unit that you can see - so the driver can easily afford to dither dots over 9 pixels before you would even see any performance fall-off. Epson take advantage of this using a stochastic dither process which produces very high colour accuracy over areas where adjacent pixels are almost identical, yet achieves up to 360cy/in resolution on the page where the image actually contains such information. -- Kennedy Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed; A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's ****ed. Python Philosophers (replace 'nospam' with 'kennedym' when replying) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do the New Epson Printers Still Clog? | Poindexter | Digital Photography | 74 | August 23rd 04 12:09 AM |
Getting consistent colors from different Tektronix / Xerox printers | Kirill Ponazdyr | Digital Photography | 1 | July 19th 04 03:06 AM |
STEVE KRAMER: A Photographer With Expensive Gear And LimitedTalent | Fred Nurk | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | July 18th 04 02:08 PM |
Epson printers ...on of off? | SumJuan | Digital Photography | 8 | July 3rd 04 06:49 PM |
Need suggestions on printers:) | Lynne | Digital Photography | 0 | June 30th 04 07:07 PM |