If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
1.6x body a complement to FF?
Donald Specker wrote:
Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to a FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with telephoto lenses, costs less than another 5D. It can be a good complement, if you do sports photography (for example), the x1,6 crop factor can be helpfull ! -- Daniel Rocha | Photographie http://www.monochromatique.com |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
1.6x body a complement to FF?
Verdoux wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:11:41 -0400, Alan Browne wrote: This newsgroup is for 35mm film photography. No. It's for 35mm format camera equipment from which most DSLR cameras are derived. Digital SLR shooters have rec.photo.digital and rec.photo.digital.slr-systems. Why do they need to come to this group as well? To prevent any sensible discussion about film photogtaphy, of course! If you try to discuss film here, they wade in with ludicrous statements such as "film is dead" and "digital is better", neither of which are true! But it has the desired effect, and cuts short any discussion about film. There are other good film forums that you can sign up to use, such as the Analog Photography Users Group: http://www.apug.org/ |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
1.6x body a complement to FF?
"William Graham" skrev i en meddelelse ... "Max Perl" wrote in message k... "Yoshi" skrev i en meddelelse ... "Donald Specker" wrote in message news:xOQJi.2062$YN2.1569@trndny07... Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to a FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with telephoto lenses, costs less than another 5D. Thanks. This newsgroup is for 35mm film photography. It was......but has adapted to the real world where 35mm film today is almost non existing! In general, to devote a whole newsgroup to one particular type of photographic sensing plane is pretty restrictive.....Basically, there is little difference between 35 mm cameras and small hand held digital cameras....They both produce the same results, and require the same auxiliary equipment (lenses, tripods, carry bags, and etc.) in order to get those results. What does it matter whether a photograph I see on my computer was taken with film and then digitized by a film scanner, or whether it was digitized directly inside the camera? In either case, I can't see it on my computer unless it is digitized by something, somewhere along the way. And, should I not want digitized photos, then I would be restricted to living at my local camera store, which is about what my father had to do. You should have written this response to "Yoshi"......and not to me. I don't care how the final output is created (film or digital). I was responding to this statement: "This newsgroup is for 35mm film photography" |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nikon D80 - Buy Body Only or Body with Kit Lens? | Bill Gillespie | Digital SLR Cameras | 38 | December 8th 06 07:25 PM |
FA: Beginners, students and those who need a 2nd camera body need this Canon AE-1 body! | Hugh Lyon-Sach | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 1 | August 12th 05 09:26 PM |
FS : DCS 460 - N 90 body only | P | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | August 3rd 05 01:24 AM |
FS: X-370 body | Joe | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 1 | February 27th 04 07:12 PM |
FS: Nikkormat FT (Body Only) | [email protected] | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | January 7th 04 11:03 PM |