If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Suggestions for a Digital Camera?
Hello
I was ready to upgrade from my sturdy little Powershot A20 to a higher number Canon Powershot until I began reading about the E18 error and class action suit. I'd like to stay with CF cards. I have a reader and several cards. I'd like a camera with a workable manual focus. From time to time I want to take a photo of a flower on the end of a stem and have it, not the background in focus. Does anyone make a camera that lets you set the focal length based on your estimate of the actual distance, or at least provide feedback in terms of an actual number? Based on my experience with the A20, I also like AA NiMH batteries. Have any users got suggestions for a camera that I can buy? Alternatively, will the day ever arrive when I can install a back on my OM-1 or OM-4 body, a back that contains a CCD, a compartment for 4 AA batteries, a CF card holder, and the circuitry to process an image and store it? It would be nice to use all that hardware again, but without film, especially now that Kodak is abandoning the film business and Kodachrome 25 is history. Thanks, Baumgrenze |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Suggestions for a Digital Camera?
baumgrenze wrote:
Hello I was ready to upgrade from my sturdy little Powershot A20 to a higher number Canon Powershot until I began reading about the E18 error and class action suit. I'd like to stay with CF cards. I have a reader and several cards. I would suggest that picking a camera based on that would not be a good idea. You are likely to eliminate some fine cameras and likely the best one for you but doing so. Don't ignore a camera because of the media, just consider home much that feature is worth to you and add it into the bag of considerations. :-) I'd like a camera with a workable manual focus. From time to time I want to take a photo of a flower on the end of a stem and have it, not the background in focus. Does anyone make a camera that lets you set the focal length based on your estimate of the actual distance, or at least provide feedback in terms of an actual number? Most if not all the dSLR's fit that requirement. I would also suggest that an SLR will have some great macro lenses available and a TTL focusing so you can see what is in focus before you shoot. Of course they are going to cost a little more. However some of the lower end models have a lot to offer with not that high a cost. Check out the Canon Rebel models or the equivalent in other brands. Based on my experience with the A20, I also like AA NiMH batteries. Have any users got suggestions for a camera that I can buy? Alternatively, will the day ever arrive when I can install a back on my OM-1 or OM-4 body, a back that contains a CCD, a compartment for 4 AA batteries, a CF card holder, and the circuitry to process an image and store it? It would be nice to use all that hardware again, but without film, especially now that Kodak is abandoning the film business and Kodachrome 25 is history. Thanks, Baumgrenze -- Joseph Meehan Dia duit |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Suggestions for a Digital Camera?
On 19 Feb 2006 23:49:33 -0800, "baumgrenze"
wrote: Hello I was ready to upgrade from my sturdy little Powershot A20 to a higher number Canon Powershot until I began reading about the E18 error and class action suit. I'd like to stay with CF cards. I have a reader and several cards. Here I too agree with the other person that responded & suggested not limiting your search to a camera with CF memory only. There are some that meet all of your needs but many more & newer models, especially those that use SD memory might better serve you. I'd like a camera with a workable manual focus. From time to time I want to take a photo of a flower on the end of a stem and have it, not the background in focus. Does anyone make a camera that lets you set the focal length based on your estimate of the actual distance, or at least provide feedback in terms of an actual number? This part is fairly simple especially for a P&S type camera which generally has a much wider DOF (Depth Of Field) than larger lens/senor cameras such a DSLR. The trick is 2 fold. 1 Buy a P&S camera with manual focus capability. 2 Buy a camera that also has a "Custom" mode which will record all of your setting in that mode. This will allow you to instantly reconfigure your camera to your favorite settings for the type of "Custom" photography that you want to do. The beauty of a "Custom" mode is that most cameras with it will recall even MF settings & zoom lens position as well as the usual other settings. If you want to stay with Canon, I believe the A95 was the last camera they made that meets all of "your" desired needs & has a "Custom" mode. If you your willing to part with CF compatibility, the A610 or A620 would be worth considering. They both have all of the above but use SD flash memory cards. Canon has converted their entire P&S line over to SD memory, its is now cost competitive with CF & available in 2GB size cards from several manufacturers. There are very likely other manufactures that meet all of the above requirements with current models but off-hand I don't know which they are but this link should help you locate them: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare.asp Also here is a link that you may find well worth a look even though it talks about the Canon A80, the principles are basically the same & I found it very helpful. Since many P&S cameras have difficulty focusing or are at least slow to focus in low light, this method of setting the camera up in a "hyper-focal" type mode works wonders & greatly reduces shutter lag time too! http://albert.achtung.com/cameras/A80/index7.html#SNAP Based on my experience with the A20, I also like AA NiMH batteries. Have any users got suggestions for a camera that I can buy? Alternatively, will the day ever arrive when I can install a back on my OM-1 or OM-4 body, a back that contains a CCD, a compartment for 4 AA batteries, a CF card holder, and the circuitry to process an image and store it? It would be nice to use all that hardware again, but without film, especially now that Kodak is abandoning the film business and Kodachrome 25 is history. Very unlikely because the profit to expense ratio would not be in the manufactures favor. Too small of a "potential" market, sorry. Thanks, Baumgrenze Best of luck, I hope what I offered helps you or somebody. Respectfully, DHB "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Suggestions for a Digital Camera?
baumgrenze wrote:
Alternatively, will the day ever arrive when I can install a back on my OM-1 or OM-4 body, a back that contains a CCD, a compartment for 4 AA batteries, a CF card holder, and the circuitry to process an image and store it? It would be nice to use all that hardware again, but without film, especially now that Kodak is abandoning the film business and Kodachrome 25 is history. It is possible, but not likely. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Suggestions for a Digital Camera?
It appears I should have included a link after my first paragraph. Here
it is, with the first bit of text on the web page. http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news0...non_class.html Canon Named in Class Action Suit Company Ignored Defect in Digital Cameras, Suit Charges September 13, 2005 A defect in a product is one thing. A failure to deal with it is far more serious. They should never have let things get to this point. baumgrenze |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Suggestions for a Digital Camera?
baumgrenze wrote:
It appears I should have included a link after my first paragraph. Here it is, with the first bit of text on the web page. http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news0...non_class.html Canon Named in Class Action Suit Company Ignored Defect in Digital Cameras, Suit Charges September 13, 2005 A defect in a product is one thing. A failure to deal with it is far more serious. They should never have let things get to this point. baumgrenze I wonder who's behind that site? It does not appear to be any government agency. I wonder how accurate the information may be. -- Joseph Meehan Dia duit |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Suggestions for a Digital Camera?
On 20 Feb 2006 09:42:59 -0800, "baumgrenze"
wrote: It appears I should have included a link after my first paragraph. Here it is, with the first bit of text on the web page. http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news0...non_class.html Canon Named in Class Action Suit Company Ignored Defect in Digital Cameras, Suit Charges September 13, 2005 A defect in a product is one thing. A failure to deal with it is far more serious. They should never have let things get to this point. baumgrenze A universal response to the claim that the user did someting wrong is, "No, I didn't." Just like the response by many notables when accused of just about anything from drug use to DUI to child molestation: "No, I didn't." I'm sure some of them actually didn't. But most are found guilty, or make a bargain whilke protesting innocence. In this case, "probably" Canon has a problem. But I don't see a class action suit as much more than money makers for lawyers. Here, you can have the soap box back... :-) -- Bill Funk replace "g" with "a" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Suggestions for a Digital Camera?
Mea Culpa.
Thank you Joseph Meehan for raising the question, "I wonder who's behind that site?" I did a search and learned the following information once constituted a 'bottom of the home page disclaimer' on their website. It is no longer there. "Consumer Affairs.Com is a service of The Oakton Press, Inc., in association with the Law Offices of Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates, Ltd., licensed to practice in Illinois. ConsumerAffairs.Com is an independent service not affiliated with any government agency. The information on this Website is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice. The Oakton Press makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. See About ConsumerAffairs.Com for more information. " A search of their website shows that Horwitz et. al. are the attorneys who have filed on many of the prominent complaints featured on the website. They are not the only firm to file against Canon with regard to E18. In their current FAQ Consumer Affairs.Com says: Are you hooked up with lawyers in some way? Yes, lawyers read all of the complaints submitted to us by consumers. They then advise us, the editors, to help us figure out which complaints reflect illegal activity, which are just distasteful, etc. On occasion, the lawyers will find something that they believe could form the basis of a class action suit on behalf of consumers. They then research the issue and, now and then, file suit against the perpetrator. Since our founding, hundreds of class action suits have been filed on behalf of consumers. We are not a party to those actions and do not profit from them. A friend of mine sent you a complaint, then the company took care of him but you didn't remove his complaint. Why not? First of all, when a complaint is filed it becomes our property, as clearly stated on the complaint form. We are under no obligation to the consumer who sent it to us to remove it just because he changes his mind. To be blunt, this is not an extortion service. If you send us a complaint about the Bucket of Bolts Store and the store owner then sends you a truckload of bolts, that's great for you -- but what about all the other poor boltless wonders he took advantage of? Sorry, that's not what we're here for. Caveat emptor - both with regard to E18 and consumeraffairs.com. baumgrenze |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Suggestions for a Digital Camera?
"baumgrenze" wrote in message
oups.com... Mea Culpa. Thank you Joseph Meehan for raising the question, "I wonder who's behind that site?" I did a search and learned the following information once constituted a 'bottom of the home page disclaimer' on their website. It is no longer there. "Consumer Affairs.Com is a service of The Oakton Press, Inc., in association with the Law Offices of Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates, Ltd., licensed to practice in Illinois. ConsumerAffairs.Com is an independent service not affiliated with any government agency. The information on this Website is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice. The Oakton Press makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. See About ConsumerAffairs.Com for more information. " A search of their website shows that Horwitz et. al. are the attorneys who have filed on many of the prominent complaints featured on the website. They are not the only firm to file against Canon with regard to E18. Horowitz and Horowitz, if this is the firm I remember, have raised the class action "lawsuit" (read: shakedown) to an art form. Forbes had an article on them a few years ago. They hit large firms with nuisance suits that are cheaper for the companies to settle than to contest. And, big surprise, the firm of Horowitz and Horowitz takes the lions' share of the settlement. After all, they have all those billable hours... Often, an impact is responsible for jamming the lens, so it won't extend, causing the Err18. -- Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Digital camera foiling technology | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 7 | September 21st 05 08:50 PM |
FA: 3D attachment for Canon Digital Rebel, turn your camera intoa digital 3d camera | [email protected] | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | December 28th 04 08:28 PM |
NYT article - GPS tagging of digital photos | Alan Browne | Digital Photography | 4 | December 22nd 04 07:36 AM |
Will digital photography ever stabilize? | Alfred Molon | Digital Photography | 37 | June 30th 04 08:11 PM |
FA: Canon PowerShot A10 Digital Camera excellent condition | Jorielle | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | September 14th 03 10:54 PM |