A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NASA spent $58 million on its Mars drone. Now it went haywire.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 30th 21, 06:32 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Alan Browne[_2_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 696
Default NASA spent $58 million on its Mars drone. Now it went haywire.

On 2021-05-30 00:08, RichA wrote:
I'm wondering what DJI would have charged to build NASA an equivalent drone?

Actually it was very well designed with a wide stability margin.

Another design decision also played a role in helping Ingenuity land
safely. As I’ve written about before, we stop using navigation camera
images during the final phase of the descent to landing to ensure smooth
and continuous estimates of the helicopter motion during this critical
phase. That design decision also paid off during Flight Six: Ingenuity
ignored the camera images in the final moments of flight, stopped
oscillating, leveled its attitude, and touched down at the speed as

Looking at the bigger picture, Flight Six ended with Ingenuity safely on
the ground because a number of subsystems – the rotor system, the
actuators, and the power system – responded to increased demands to keep
the helicopter flying. In a very real sense, Ingenuity muscled through
the situation, and while the flight uncovered a timing vulnerability
that will now have to be addressed, it also confirmed the robustness of
the system in multiple ways.

While we did not intentionally plan such a stressful flight, NASA now
has flight data probing the outer reaches of the helicopter’s
performance envelope. That data will be carefully analyzed in the time
ahead, expanding our reservoir of knowledge about flying helicopters on

Further, Ingenuity was designed to research how hard it is to fly on
Mars. What they've learned so far will inform future designs and make
them better.

Not sure if DJI would be interested, though the publicity for success
would be useful. DJI drones are highly reliant on GPS for navigation.
There is no GPS constellation around the moon.[2]

It's also a Chinese company and the US and China are not very space
cooperative (The USA never wanted China to be part of the ISS, for example).
__________________________________________________ _____________________

[2] There are proposals for such as well as a proposal to use the
'leakage'[3] from earth GPS/Galileo/GLONASS signals for nav on Mars. It
would only cover part of the planet at a time (obviously) and would
probably not be available during opposition for some time (days).
Accuracy would be on the order of 100m.

[3] by leakage, that part of the signal that misses the earth and
radiates towards Mars.

"...there are many humorous things in this world; among them the white
man's notion that he is less savage than the other savages."
-Samuel Clemens

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASA spent $58 million on its Mars drone. Now it went haywire. Eric Stevens Digital Photography 1 May 30th 21 06:43 PM
Photographer cited, had drone confiscated for documenting Hart Island mass burials with his drone Alfred Molon[_4_] Digital Photography 19 April 21st 20 06:59 PM
NASA's Mars probe: NO cmos, NO Bayer Voodoo Thunder Pig Digital SLR Cameras 11 June 29th 08 07:22 AM
"Your money is better spent on an SLR". Is it? David J Taylor Digital Photography 45 December 11th 04 05:01 PM
Best Spent $600??? Tom C. Digital Photography 20 August 9th 04 05:28 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.