Boycott Nikon ?

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/404665719

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:14:07 -0500, "Chuck"
wrote:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/404665719

Yeah, that'll work.



+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ The News Guy(Mike) - Seinfeld Lists
+ (two mirrored sites)
+ http://membres.lycos.fr/tnguym
+ http://wave.prohosting.com/tnguym NOWTHISWORKS
+ All things Seinfeld; scripts, trivia, lists,
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

TheNewsGuyMike wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:14:07 -0500, "Chuck"
wrote:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/404665719

Yeah, that'll work.



LOL!

Especially when the petition expired in March of 2003 - 4000+ short of
the goal of 5000 votes....

ECM

So, is Nikon really a subsidiary of Mitsubishi, as many believe, or do they
have one of those wierd, semi-legal (even by Japanese standards) corporate
inter-relationships? This is really an important issue with regard to the
survival of Nikon as it has been historically constituted.

bmoag wrote:
So, is Nikon really a subsidiary of Mitsubishi, as many believe, or
do they have one of those wierd, semi-legal (even by Japanese
standards) corporate inter-relationships? This is really an important
issue with regard to the survival of Nikon as it has been
historically constituted.

....and just how much wood goes into the average Nikon camera?

"bmoag" a écrit dans le message de
...
So, is Nikon really a subsidiary of Mitsubishi, as many believe, or do
they
have one of those wierd, semi-legal (even by Japanese standards) corporate
inter-relationships? This is really an important issue with regard to the
survival of Nikon as it has been historically constituted.


http://www.mitsubishisucks.com/nikon

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:04:57 -0500, "Chuck"
wrote:


"bmoag" a écrit dans le message de
m...
So, is Nikon really a subsidiary of Mitsubishi, as many believe, or do
they
have one of those wierd, semi-legal (even by Japanese standards) corporate
inter-relationships? This is really an important issue with regard to the
survival of Nikon as it has been historically constituted.


http://www.mitsubishisucks.com/nikon


Obviously that's an objective view. I notice that they ask for
readers to send them reports of negative experiences with the Nikon
D70 -- but, apparently, only negative reports are needed. So if a
million people like the camera and one person hates it, they're just
interested in the one.

Oh, and I love the bit about the guy from Newsday who claims that a
Sony is superior in lens quality. But with the Nikon, the lens comes
off, so the lens can be better or worse, depending on which one
somebody has on the camera. Duh.
--

Pete McCutchen

Pete McCutchen wrote:

[....]

Oh, and I love the bit about the guy from Newsday who claims that a
Sony is superior in lens quality. But with the Nikon, the lens comes
off, so the lens can be better or worse, depending on which one
somebody has on the camera. Duh.

You noticed that too, huh? When I read that, I practically sucked cola
up my nose.


--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

"bmoag" a écrit dans le message de
...
So, is Nikon really a subsidiary of Mitsubishi, as many believe, or do
they
have one of those wierd, semi-legal (even by Japanese standards) corporate
inter-relationships? This is really an important issue with regard to the
survival of Nikon as it has been historically constituted.


http://www.mitsubishisucks.com/nikon

Chuck wrote:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/404665719

I like this reason someone posted.

"i feel that no company should trade timber"

Yea and like how would we build houses and furniture? LOL

--

Stacey