[NG] news:rec.photo.digital.slr-systems is online

Alan Browne wrote:
Frank ess wrote:

"_If_ you want to present your question and observation to a more
interested, possibly more qualified forum, you _should_ post it in
apd.elswhere, a group established to enhance your chances of receiving
worthwhile responses oin your apparent area of concern."

I respect your POV Frank. However a more succinct way of saying it
is:

"For those interested in DSLR's, let's concentrate on them in the
place that has been created for them: rpd.slr-systems"

I won't appologize for taking a pro-active stance here. The NG was
created to take on these discussions in an area with less
distraction.

Well, okay. But a future in which DSLR discussions on r.p.d. are
punctuated by requests to move to r.p.r.s-s doesn't look very
attractive. Besides, you have to bear in mind the possibility that
proselytizing here for the new groups might be counterproductive.
People can be rebellious!

Andrew.

Kibo informs me that lid stated that:

Alan Browne wrote:
I won't appologize for taking a pro-active stance here. The NG was
created to take on these discussions in an area with less
distraction.

Well, okay. But a future in which DSLR discussions on r.p.d. are
punctuated by requests to move to r.p.r.s-s doesn't look very
attractive. Besides, you have to bear in mind the possibility that
proselytizing here for the new groups might be counterproductive.
People can be rebellious!

Yes. And I think a polite approach is better anyway, just as a matter of
good manners.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

Kibo informs me that lid stated that:

Alan Browne wrote:
I won't appologize for taking a pro-active stance here. The NG was
created to take on these discussions in an area with less
distraction.

Well, okay. But a future in which DSLR discussions on r.p.d. are
punctuated by requests to move to r.p.r.s-s doesn't look very
attractive. Besides, you have to bear in mind the possibility that
proselytizing here for the new groups might be counterproductive.
People can be rebellious!

Yes. And I think a polite approach is better anyway, just as a matter of
good manners.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

In article ,
says...
Alan Browne wrote:
I won't appologize for taking a pro-active stance here. The NG was
created to take on these discussions in an area with less
distraction.



So you consider a disscusion about a digital camera in
rec.photo.digital to be a distraction????

Thats just snobbery, plain and simple.

My providers (I use three different ones) will provide the
groups when they "get around to it".

Maybe they should check with you. I'll suggest it.




--
Larry Lynch
Mystic, Ct.

In article ,
says...
Alan Browne wrote:
I won't appologize for taking a pro-active stance here. The NG was
created to take on these discussions in an area with less
distraction.



So you consider a disscusion about a digital camera in
rec.photo.digital to be a distraction????

Thats just snobbery, plain and simple.

My providers (I use three different ones) will provide the
groups when they "get around to it".

Maybe they should check with you. I'll suggest it.




--
Larry Lynch
Mystic, Ct.