Nikon D600 a compromise but ok

PeterN wrote:
On 9/14/2012 9:15 PM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
PeterN wrote:
On 9/14/2012 8:05 PM, RichA wrote:
On Sep 14, 3:47 am, (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:
RichA wrote:
On Sep 13, 3:01 am, Me wrote:
On 13/09/2012 6:19 p.m., Rich wrote: Yes, it has a FF sensor, 24mp. But, you don't get it for $2099 and not
suffer some compromises. 1/2 plastic body, 0.7x viewfinder, D7000 body
ergonomics (Yeesh! I hope it's closer to the D300 body) but for someone who
needs FF on the cheap, this is it. The kit lens, if it's as good as the
16-85DX for $600 should be good though.

The VF is 100% -

VF magnification is 0.7.

Just like all of Nikon's top of the line FX bodies, the
D3, the D3s, the D3X, the D4. The D800 and now the
D600 too.

The D700 is different, it's 95% and 0.72x magnification.

Other than that you don't know what that means, did you
have a point?

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)

Fanboy alert. Never mention anything even seemingly negative.


Exactly when did you give anything a positive review?

When did he give anything a *valid* review!


I don't believe you actually agree with something I posted. G

I didn't. Can't you read anything right? Your article
is as non-responive as his. Non-sequiturs are not
debating points!

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)