A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hummers @ 1/3200



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 18th 16, 05:32 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default Hummers @ 1/3200

OK! This morning I went back to the mechanical shutter after
yesterday's weird ES effect. I shot these at 1/3200, ISO 1600.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3683.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3697.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3681.jpg
--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #2  
Old September 18th 16, 08:20 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Mort[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 396
Default Hummers @ 1/3200

Savageduck wrote:
OK! This morning I went back to the mechanical shutter after yesterday's
weird ES effect. I shot these at 1/3200, ISO 1600.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3683.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3697.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3681.jpg



Very nice photos, and no more shutter-induced distortion. Great.

Mort Linder
  #3  
Old September 18th 16, 09:16 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Joe Makowiec
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 175
Default Hummers @ 1/3200

On 18 Sep 2016 in rec.photo.digital, Savageduck wrote:

OK! This morning I went back to the mechanical shutter after
yesterday's weird ES effect. I shot these at 1/3200, ISO 1600.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3683.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3697.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3681.jpg


Interesting what the camera picked as focus distance, in the pictures
with multiple birds. In both of them, there's a somewhat out-of-focus
bird in front of what appears to be the main / centered subject.

--
Joe Makowiec
http://makowiec.org/
Email: http://makowiec.org/contact/?Joe
Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/
  #4  
Old September 18th 16, 09:28 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Bill W
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,692
Default Hummers @ 1/3200

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:32:14 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

OK! This morning I went back to the mechanical shutter after
yesterday's weird ES effect. I shot these at 1/3200, ISO 1600.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3683.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3697.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3681.jpg


Really nice photos. Have you tried this yet with a smaller aperture,
just to see how many birds you can get in focus while still using a
high shutter speed, and a low enough ISO to get about the same IQ?
There's no actual purpose, just curious how far you can push things
with that gear.
  #5  
Old September 18th 16, 09:33 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default Hummers @ 1/3200

On 2016-09-18 20:16:16 +0000, Joe Makowiec said:

On 18 Sep 2016 in rec.photo.digital, Savageduck wrote:

OK! This morning I went back to the mechanical shutter after
yesterday's weird ES effect. I shot these at 1/3200, ISO 1600.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3683.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3697.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3681.jpg


Interesting what the camera picked as focus distance, in the pictures
with multiple birds. In both of them, there's a somewhat out-of-focus
bird in front of what appears to be the main / centered subject.


I think that has to do with the AF-C with the Fujifilm "Zone Tracking".
I was deliberately trying to lock on a bird in motion rather than one
which had already settled. So the actual focus point(s) were constantly
moving within the zone once the target bird had been selected. That
also dictated my use of a high shutter speed.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #6  
Old September 18th 16, 09:48 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default Hummers @ 1/3200

On 2016-09-18 20:28:48 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:32:14 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

OK! This morning I went back to the mechanical shutter after
yesterday's weird ES effect. I shot these at 1/3200, ISO 1600.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3683.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3697.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3681.jpg


Really nice photos. Have you tried this yet with a smaller aperture,
just to see how many birds you can get in focus while still using a
high shutter speed, and a low enough ISO to get about the same IQ?
There's no actual purpose, just curious how far you can push things
with that gear.


I am pretty much in the experimental, "how far can I push this" phase,
so I will be trying just that. I
suspect there will be a sweet spot (in good light) somewhere in the
1/2000-1/4000, and f/8-f/11 range. I have been shooting these with Auto
ISO with an ISO 200 base and ISO 1600 cap. All of the shots taken this
morning ended up at ISO 1600, the shots I took yesterday, also at Auto
ISO 200-1600, ended up as a mix of ISO 800, ISO 1250, & ISO 1600.

I will probably also use Auto ISO 3200 in these trials.
--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #7  
Old September 18th 16, 09:54 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Bill W
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,692
Default Hummers @ 1/3200

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:48:38 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-09-18 20:28:48 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:32:14 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

OK! This morning I went back to the mechanical shutter after
yesterday's weird ES effect. I shot these at 1/3200, ISO 1600.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3683.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3697.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3681.jpg


Really nice photos. Have you tried this yet with a smaller aperture,
just to see how many birds you can get in focus while still using a
high shutter speed, and a low enough ISO to get about the same IQ?
There's no actual purpose, just curious how far you can push things
with that gear.


I am pretty much in the experimental, "how far can I push this" phase,
so I will be trying just that. I
suspect there will be a sweet spot (in good light) somewhere in the
1/2000-1/4000, and f/8-f/11 range. I have been shooting these with Auto
ISO with an ISO 200 base and ISO 1600 cap. All of the shots taken this
morning ended up at ISO 1600, the shots I took yesterday, also at Auto
ISO 200-1600, ended up as a mix of ISO 800, ISO 1250, & ISO 1600.

I will probably also use Auto ISO 3200 in these trials.


Any post done on those 3?
  #8  
Old September 18th 16, 10:02 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default Hummers @ 1/3200

On 2016-09-18 20:54:36 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:48:38 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-09-18 20:28:48 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:32:14 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

OK! This morning I went back to the mechanical shutter after
yesterday's weird ES effect. I shot these at 1/3200, ISO 1600.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3683.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3697.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3681.jpg

Really nice photos. Have you tried this yet with a smaller aperture,
just to see how many birds you can get in focus while still using a
high shutter speed, and a low enough ISO to get about the same IQ?
There's no actual purpose, just curious how far you can push things
with that gear.


I am pretty much in the experimental, "how far can I push this" phase,
so I will be trying just that. I
suspect there will be a sweet spot (in good light) somewhere in the
1/2000-1/4000, and f/8-f/11 range. I have been shooting these with Auto
ISO with an ISO 200 base and ISO 1600 cap. All of the shots taken this
morning ended up at ISO 1600, the shots I took yesterday, also at Auto
ISO 200-1600, ended up as a mix of ISO 800, ISO 1250, & ISO 1600.

I will probably also use Auto ISO 3200 in these trials.


Any post done on those 3?


A tad. I am a Lightroom junkie after all, but if you are curious I can
provide the uncropped, unmolested SOOC JPEGs.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #9  
Old September 18th 16, 10:06 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default Hummers @ 1/3200

On 2016-09-18 21:02:04 +0000, Savageduck said:

On 2016-09-18 20:54:36 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:48:38 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-09-18 20:28:48 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:32:14 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

OK! This morning I went back to the mechanical shutter after
yesterday's weird ES effect. I shot these at 1/3200, ISO 1600.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3683.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3697.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3681.jpg

Really nice photos. Have you tried this yet with a smaller aperture,
just to see how many birds you can get in focus while still using a
high shutter speed, and a low enough ISO to get about the same IQ?
There's no actual purpose, just curious how far you can push things
with that gear.

I am pretty much in the experimental, "how far can I push this" phase,
so I will be trying just that. I
suspect there will be a sweet spot (in good light) somewhere in the
1/2000-1/4000, and f/8-f/11 range. I have been shooting these with Auto
ISO with an ISO 200 base and ISO 1600 cap. All of the shots taken this
morning ended up at ISO 1600, the shots I took yesterday, also at Auto
ISO 200-1600, ended up as a mix of ISO 800, ISO 1250, & ISO 1600.

I will probably also use Auto ISO 3200 in these trials.


Any post done on those 3?


A tad. I am a Lightroom junkie after all, but if you are curious I can
provide the uncropped, unmolested SOOC JPEGs.


Here are those SOOC JPEGs.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3697-2.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3683-2.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3681-2.jpg
--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #10  
Old September 18th 16, 10:15 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Bill W
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,692
Default Hummers @ 1/3200

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:06:08 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-09-18 21:02:04 +0000, Savageduck said:

On 2016-09-18 20:54:36 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:48:38 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-09-18 20:28:48 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:32:14 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

OK! This morning I went back to the mechanical shutter after
yesterday's weird ES effect. I shot these at 1/3200, ISO 1600.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3683.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3697.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3681.jpg

Really nice photos. Have you tried this yet with a smaller aperture,
just to see how many birds you can get in focus while still using a
high shutter speed, and a low enough ISO to get about the same IQ?
There's no actual purpose, just curious how far you can push things
with that gear.

I am pretty much in the experimental, "how far can I push this" phase,
so I will be trying just that. I
suspect there will be a sweet spot (in good light) somewhere in the
1/2000-1/4000, and f/8-f/11 range. I have been shooting these with Auto
ISO with an ISO 200 base and ISO 1600 cap. All of the shots taken this
morning ended up at ISO 1600, the shots I took yesterday, also at Auto
ISO 200-1600, ended up as a mix of ISO 800, ISO 1250, & ISO 1600.

I will probably also use Auto ISO 3200 in these trials.

Any post done on those 3?


A tad. I am a Lightroom junkie after all, but if you are curious I can
provide the uncropped, unmolested SOOC JPEGs.


Here are those SOOC JPEGs.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3697-2.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3683-2.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/Demo/_DSF3681-2.jpg


They look pretty sharp, so I guess you didn't do much sharpening.
That's what I was most curious about.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HUMMERS LOVE THE 5D2! Russell D. 35mm Photo Equipment 1 September 25th 11 01:38 PM
HUMMERS LOVE THE 5D2! John McWilliams 35mm Photo Equipment 0 September 10th 11 07:57 PM
MORNING HUMMERS LOVE THE 40D! David Nebenzahl 35mm Photo Equipment 0 August 11th 08 05:58 PM
D60 MEETS HUMMERS HEAD ON !! Annika1980 35mm Photo Equipment 114 September 13th 04 01:56 PM
HUMMERS LIKE IT UP CLOSE !!! Annika1980 Digital Photography 8 July 28th 04 11:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.