A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A few more from Yosemite



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 18th 17, 05:00 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default A few more from Yosemite

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xvqfsozxu086j53/DSF4553-E.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/or7cq6um4psithj/DSF4573-E.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/byvhxa4iqicdw03/DSF4685-E.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/uonqwq86ierx5ug/DSF4758-E.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/448rl27c57zsiye/DSF4740-E.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/h3lpskk7dcay8ql/DSF4763.jpg
--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #2  
Old May 18th 17, 05:45 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Russell D.[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24
Default A few more from Yosemite

On 05/17/2017 10:00 PM, Savageduck wrote:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xvqfsozxu086j53/DSF4553-E.jpg



Beautiful. The sky is awesome.

Russell
  #3  
Old May 18th 17, 01:18 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Mayayana
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,514
Default A few more from Yosemite


"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2017051721002020171-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/xvqfsozxu086j53/DSF4553-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/or7cq6um4psithj/DSF4573-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/byvhxa4iqicdw03/DSF4685-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/uonqwq86ierx5ug/DSF4758-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/448rl27c57zsiye/DSF4740-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/h3lpskk7dcay8ql/DSF4763.jpg


An interesting effect that I don't understand: The
images seem a bit hazy. (In Pale Moon [Firefox].) I then
downloaded E and viewed it in IrfanView. It's noticeably
sharper with deeper colors! I don't think I've ever
noticed such an effect before.

It must be nice to live within driving distance of
such jaw-dropping landscapes.

Technical note: I see the images but need to set
"No Style". I also wonder about the and . Maybe
some kind of software is inserting those? They serve
no purpose and make it harder to copy the link.


  #4  
Old May 18th 17, 03:30 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default A few more from Yosemite

On 2017-05-18 12:18:52 +0000, "Mayayana" said:


"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2017051721002020171-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/xvqfsozxu086j53/DSF4553-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/or7cq6um4psithj/DSF4573-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/byvhxa4iqicdw03/DSF4685-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/uonqwq86ierx5ug/DSF4758-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/448rl27c57zsiye/DSF4740-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/h3lpskk7dcay8ql/DSF4763.jpg


An interesting effect that I don't understand: The
images seem a bit hazy. (In Pale Moon [Firefox].) I then
downloaded E and viewed it in IrfanView. It's noticeably
sharper with deeper colors! I don't think I've ever
noticed such an effect before.


I have know idea of what effect "Pale Moon" might have on your viewing
experience, as I am not using Firefox, but it is odd.

It must be nice to live within driving distance of
such jaw-dropping landscapes.


It is a 3 hour drive.

Technical note: I see the images but need to set
"No Style". I also wonder about the and . Maybe
some kind of software is inserting those? They serve
no purpose and make it harder to copy the link.


The "No Style" is a Fujifilm EXIF header group in the RAW (RAF) files,
which with the SOOC JPEGs will usually refer to Fujifilm film
simulations. Usually these will be listed as "Film Simulation",
"Monochrome", "Pict Style Color Space", "Picture Style"(exposure
setting), "Saturation" (Typically, Normal, 0,0), and "Sharpness"
(in-camera applied JPEG sharpness level).

The " & " are standard Usenet UTF-8 URL (link) delimiters and I use
them to prevent broken URL links. However, some nonconforming Usenet
clients will still break URLs even if the delimiters are used. I just
do what I can to prevent that.
--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #5  
Old May 18th 17, 03:44 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Mayayana
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,514
Default A few more from Yosemite

"Savageduck" wrote

| It must be nice to live within driving distance of
| such jaw-dropping landscapes.
|
| It is a 3 hour drive.
|

Very nice. The best I can do is to reach the Kancamagus
Highway in that time. Which is beautiful, but not on the
same scale.

| Technical note: I see the images but need to set
| "No Style". I also wonder about the and . Maybe
| some kind of software is inserting those? They serve
| no purpose and make it harder to copy the link.
|
| The "No Style" is a Fujifilm EXIF header group in the RAW (RAF) files,

I meant No Style in the browser. Dropbox is doing something
that hides the images from me, but if I go to View - Style
- No Style to drop out the CSS then I can see it. I just
mentioned that in case others have trouble.

| The " & " are standard Usenet UTF-8 URL (link) delimiters and I use
| them to prevent broken URL links. However, some nonconforming Usenet
| clients will still break URLs even if the delimiters are used. I just
| do what I can to prevent that.

Not a big deal. I just find it easier to click-select the line
to paste in a browser, while the brackets require a
more careful drag-select.


  #6  
Old May 18th 17, 04:40 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default A few more from Yosemite

On 2017-05-18 14:44:30 +0000, "Mayayana" said:

"Savageduck" wrote

| It must be nice to live within driving distance of
| such jaw-dropping landscapes.
|
| It is a 3 hour drive.
|

Very nice. The best I can do is to reach the Kancamagus
Highway in that time. Which is beautiful, but not on the
same scale.

| Technical note: I see the images but need to set
| "No Style". I also wonder about the and . Maybe
| some kind of software is inserting those? They serve
| no purpose and make it harder to copy the link.
|
| The "No Style" is a Fujifilm EXIF header group in the RAW (RAF) files,

I meant No Style in the browser. Dropbox is doing something
that hides the images from me, but if I go to View - Style
- No Style to drop out the CSS then I can see it. I just
mentioned that in case others have trouble.


When you say "browser", are you refering to Firefox, or Outlook Express?
....and what do you mean by "hides the images from me"?
If they are hidden, how are you able to view them?

Dropbox shouldn't be doing anything with regard to EXIF changes.

| The " & " are standard Usenet UTF-8 URL (link) delimiters and I use
| them to prevent broken URL links. However, some nonconforming Usenet
| clients will still break URLs even if the delimiters are used. I just
| do what I can to prevent that.

Not a big deal. I just find it easier to click-select the line
to paste in a browser, while the brackets require a
more careful drag-select.


I see that you use MS Outlook Express, I suspect since it is not a
particularly good Usenet client that it is not conforming when it comes
to dealing with the " " delimiters. What you should be seeing is a
clickable URL/link contained within those delimiters. However,
admitedly for those who have to use your method, some care must be
employed when making the selection.
--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #7  
Old May 18th 17, 11:50 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Mayayana
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,514
Default A few more from Yosemite

"Savageduck" wrote

| When you say "browser", are you refering to Firefox, or Outlook Express?
| ...and what do you mean by "hides the images from me"?
| If they are hidden, how are you able to view them?
|
| Dropbox shouldn't be doing anything with regard to EXIF changes.
|
Firefox. An increasing number of pages show
up with partially blank content. If you're not
familiar with webpage coding it's hard to explain.
HTML specifies something like an image. CSS can
be used to specify details like position and border.
Sometimes CSS is used to hide content which is
then only made visible via script. I'm not sure
why. So with script routinely disabled, I sometimes
see missing items. But the if I also disable CSS then
I just get the basic HTML and it works.

Undoubtedly more than you care to know. It's
part of the increasing complication of protecting
privacy and security online.

| I see that you use MS Outlook Express, I suspect since it is not a
| particularly good Usenet client that it is not conforming when it comes
| to dealing with the " " delimiters. What you should be seeing is a
| clickable URL/link contained within those delimiters. However,
| admitedly for those who have to use your method, some care must be
| employed when making the selection.

It has nothing to do with OE, which works quite
well for Usenet. And there's no reason to put
brackets around a link. It serves no purpose and
does not conform with any kind of HTML standard.
But it's not a big deal, as I said. I just prefer not to
click links in the post.... Don't ask.


  #8  
Old May 18th 17, 04:49 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default A few more from Yosemite

In article , Mayayana
wrote:


| Technical note: I see the images but need to set
| "No Style". I also wonder about the and . Maybe
| some kind of software is inserting those? They serve
| no purpose and make it harder to copy the link.
|
| The "No Style" is a Fujifilm EXIF header group in the RAW (RAF) files,

I meant No Style in the browser. Dropbox is doing something
that hides the images from me, but if I go to View - Style
- No Style to drop out the CSS then I can see it. I just
mentioned that in case others have trouble.


no need to drop out css.

however, if cookies are blocked (and you've said you do that), then
dropox will display a signup popup, which can easily be dismissed.

| The " & " are standard Usenet UTF-8 URL (link) delimiters and I use
| them to prevent broken URL links. However, some nonconforming Usenet
| clients will still break URLs even if the delimiters are used. I just
| do what I can to prevent that.

Not a big deal. I just find it easier to click-select the line
to paste in a browser, while the brackets require a
more careful drag-select.


no need to copy/paste. the link should be directly clickable. if not,
get a better newsreader.
  #9  
Old May 18th 17, 05:13 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
David B.[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 195
Default A few more from Yosemite

On 5/18/2017 4:49 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , Mayayana
wrote:


| Technical note: I see the images but need to set
| "No Style". I also wonder about the and . Maybe
| some kind of software is inserting those? They serve
| no purpose and make it harder to copy the link.
|
| The "No Style" is a Fujifilm EXIF header group in the RAW (RAF) files,

I meant No Style in the browser. Dropbox is doing something
that hides the images from me, but if I go to View - Style
- No Style to drop out the CSS then I can see it. I just
mentioned that in case others have trouble.


no need to drop out css.

however, if cookies are blocked (and you've said you do that), then
dropox will display a signup popup, which can easily be dismissed.


I've noticed that .... and wondered WHY that happened! Thanks for
explaining. :-)

| The " & " are standard Usenet UTF-8 URL (link) delimiters and I use
| them to prevent broken URL links. However, some nonconforming Usenet
| clients will still break URLs even if the delimiters are used. I just
| do what I can to prevent that.

Not a big deal. I just find it easier to click-select the line
to paste in a browser, while the brackets require a
more careful drag-select.


no need to copy/paste. the link should be directly clickable. if not,
get a better newsreader.


Agreed. The links 'work' for me using Thunderbird.

--
David B.

  #10  
Old May 18th 17, 03:46 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
PAS[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 595
Default A few more from Yosemite

On 5/18/2017 10:30 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-05-18 12:18:52 +0000, "Mayayana" said:


"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2017051721002020171-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/xvqfsozxu086j53/DSF4553-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/or7cq6um4psithj/DSF4573-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/byvhxa4iqicdw03/DSF4685-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/uonqwq86ierx5ug/DSF4758-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/448rl27c57zsiye/DSF4740-E.jpg
| https://www.dropbox.com/s/h3lpskk7dcay8ql/DSF4763.jpg


An interesting effect that I don't understand: The
images seem a bit hazy. (In Pale Moon [Firefox].) I then
downloaded E and viewed it in IrfanView. It's noticeably
sharper with deeper colors! I don't think I've ever
noticed such an effect before.


I have know idea of what effect "Pale Moon" might have on your viewing
experience, as I am not using Firefox, but it is odd.

It must be nice to live within driving distance of
such jaw-dropping landscapes.


It is a 3 hour drive.


Hah, it can take me that long to travel the 55 miles to Manhattan


Technical note: I see the images but need to set
"No Style". I also wonder about the and . Maybe
some kind of software is inserting those? They serve
no purpose and make it harder to copy the link.


The "No Style" is a Fujifilm EXIF header group in the RAW (RAF) files,
which with the SOOC JPEGs will usually refer to Fujifilm film
simulations. Usually these will be listed as "Film Simulation",
"Monochrome", "Pict Style Color Space", "Picture Style"(exposure
setting), "Saturation" (Typically, Normal, 0,0), and "Sharpness"
(in-camera applied JPEG sharpness level).

The " & " are standard Usenet UTF-8 URL (link) delimiters and I use
them to prevent broken URL links. However, some nonconforming Usenet
clients will still break URLs even if the delimiters are used. I just
do what I can to prevent that.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SFO, Yosemite, etc. Alan Browne 35mm Photo Equipment 10 March 3rd 08 12:57 AM
SFO, Yosemite, etc. Alan Browne Digital SLR Cameras 19 March 2nd 08 05:46 PM
Yosemite Photos [email protected] 35mm Photo Equipment 1 November 25th 07 01:32 AM
Yosemite Photos [email protected] Digital Photography 0 November 25th 07 12:15 AM
Yosemite [email protected] Digital Photography 64 December 30th 06 08:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.