If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Question about buying a d50 cheaply
(East Bay) Phil wrote:
Just a couple of questions - 1. Have you got the 'Gimp installed? certainly. 2. If you have then make sure that you also have 'ufraw' or 'dcraw' or rawphoto installed. I have dcraw installed in order to increase the functionality of gallery 2.x. That said, I wasn't and am still not certain that this handles the decryption necessary for Nikon raw images. It does. If it does this automagically, I'm set. I'm not sure what "automagically" means to you. What /dcraw/ does is produce a PPM format file from a "raw" format. It works for just about any raw format known to exist. Command line parameters allow manipulation of anything reasonable, such as color correction, gamma, etc. Basically /dcraw/ is excellent for batch processing, but can also be used to decode image files one at a time too. I'll take images as raw, save to DVD, and upload to gallery for jpeg viewing. Note that /dcraw/ does *not* decode jpeg image files! To convert from raw, or from the PPM files that /dcraw/ produces, to jpeg requires another utility (and there are several, but /convert/ from /Imagemagik/ is a good one for batch processing). The other program you'll want is /ufraw/, which is normally a GUI standalone or front end to the GIMP, but can also be invoked as a batch process. /ufraw/ is based on /dcraw/, and is *very* much worth your time to install. My typical work flow for a batch of images that are all similar is to do one image with /ufraw/ as a standalone process, and generate a configuration file as part of the output. Then I invoke /ufraw/ as a batch process, using that configuration file, to do the entire list of files all in the same way. The commands look like this: ufraw dsc_1234.nef mv dsc_1234.ufraw IC ufraw-batch --conf=IC *.nef -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Question about buying a d50 cheaply
(East Bay) Phil wrote:
On Wed, 03 May 2006 10:56:08 -0700 SMS wrote: (East Bay) Phil wrote: I'd avoid the E-500 due to the noise issues. Also, there is no upgrade path with Olympus, nor is there a good selection of lenses. With Nikon, you have huge availability of lenses, both new, used, and third-party. In the course of investigating the Nikon, upgrade path has been something I've begun to explore. I've read posts about the d70(s) vs d50. I'm not experienced enough with the high-end to properly assess feature differences. That said, if I'm looking at the d50 w/ 18-70 vs the d70 w/ 18-70 at a similar price should I be looking to the d70? No. By the time you go to the D70s, you're almost at the cost of a Canon Rebel XT, which is better than the D70s in many ways. The D50 is perfect for what you're looking for. Hrmm. I found a refurb d70 + 18-70 for $699 at one of the recommended online stores. That's what sparked my query. This is contrasted with $399 for a d50 body + $2-300 for an 18-70 lens. I'm going to take a spin over the local camera shop today to get a feel for both of these models. It's very bad manners to try out cameras at a local shop, then buy online. Point taken. As a rule, if a local shop sells or can sell within a reasonable margin of the 'best deal' I will support the local merchant. Rest assured that they do get business from me. Good point. I bought my DSLR locally although I could have saved CDN100 if I bought it online. The local merchant threw in a CF card and if I have any problems it is just a couple of minutes down the road to the dealer. Ron -- And it really doesn't matter if I'm wrong I'm right Where I belong I'm right Where I belong. Lennon & McCartney |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Question about buying a d50 cheaply
buy it at costco where its featured now, you have six months to try it out and figure out if you would rather have something else. I've put-off the leap to digital for financial reasons and because I wanted a SLR. It seems possible to get a d50 in my range. I'm thinking of buying the body as cheaply as possible and then finding a reasonable multipurpose lens until the 18-200 becomes financially accessible to me. I have a few questions. 1 - Is there any reason I should consider the d70 or rebel xt over this camera? 2 - Any recommendations for a place to buy it cheaply? I saw some places - royal camera, best price cameras, and cci camera city - that sell the body for around $300. Are these places for real? reputable? I've never dealt with 'grey-market' goods, if that's what they sell. 3 - Assuming I do get the body and then hunt for the lens, is the 18-70 a good place to start. Truth be told, most of my experience is with a plain ol' pentax p3. :^D Thanks, Phil PS: please pardon my cross post - I'm not certain which list is most appropriate for these questions. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Question about buying a d50 cheaply
On 2006-05-03 15:15:17 -0400, (East Bay) Phil
said: On Wed, 03 May 2006 10:56:08 -0700 SMS wrote: (East Bay) Phil wrote: I'd avoid the E-500 due to the noise issues. Also, there is no upgrade path with Olympus, nor is there a good selection of lenses. With Nikon, you have huge availability of lenses, both new, used, and third-party. In the course of investigating the Nikon, upgrade path has been something I've begun to explore. I've read posts about the d70(s) vs d50. I'm not experienced enough with the high-end to properly assess feature differences. That said, if I'm looking at the d50 w/ 18-70 vs the d70 w/ 18-70 at a similar price should I be looking to the d70? No. By the time you go to the D70s, you're almost at the cost of a Canon Rebel XT, which is better than the D70s in many ways. The D50 is perfect for what you're looking for. Hrmm. I found a refurb d70 + 18-70 for $699 at one of the recommended online stores. That's what sparked my query. This is contrasted with $399 for a d50 body + $2-300 for an 18-70 lens. I'm going to take a spin over the local camera shop today to get a feel for both of these models. It's very bad manners to try out cameras at a local shop, then buy online. Point taken. As a rule, if a local shop sells or can sell within a reasonable margin of the 'best deal' I will support the local merchant. Rest assured that they do get business from me. Ditto on the above.... My local camera store sells bodies within 10 to 30 dollars of B&H prices.. why wouldn't I give my business to him. I have the D70s.. Dad has the D50. The 18-70 lens is great. You won't go wrong with either of these! -- Jim |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about buying a d50 cheaply | (East Bay) Phil | Digital Photography | 32 | May 7th 06 04:18 AM |
Question about buying a d50 cheaply | (East Bay) Phil | 35mm Photo Equipment | 32 | May 7th 06 04:18 AM |